The distribution and properties of DLAs at z ≤ 2 in the EAGLE simulations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 501:3 (2020) 4396-4419
Abstract:
Determining the spatial distribution and intrinsic physical properties of neutral hydrogen on cosmological scales is one of the key goals of next-generation radio surveys. We use the EAGLE galaxy formation simulations to assess the properties of damped Lyman α absorbers (DLAs) that are associated with galaxies and their underlying dark matter haloes between 0 ≤ z ≤ 2. We find that the covering fraction of DLAs increases at higher redshift; a significant fraction of neutral atomic hydrogen (H I) resides in the outskirts of galaxies with stellar mass ≥1010 M⊙; and the covering fraction of DLAs in the circumgalactic medium (CGM) is enhanced relative to that of the interstellar medium (ISM) with increasing halo mass. Moreover, we find that the mean density of the H I in galaxies increases with increasing stellar mass, while the DLAs in high- and low-halo mass systems have higher column densities than those in galaxies with intermediate halo masses (∼1012 M⊙ at z = 0). These high-impact CGM DLAs in high-stellar mass systems tend to be metal poor, likely tracing smooth accretion. Overall, our results point to the CGM playing an important role in DLA studies at high redshift (z ≥ 1). However, their properties are impacted both by numerical resolution and the detailed feedback prescriptions employed in cosmological simulations, particularly that of active galactic nuclei.Development status of the UV-VIS detector system of SOXS for the ESO-NTT telescope
SPIE, the international society for optics and photonics (2020) 52
SETI and democracy
Acta Astronautica Elsevier 180 (2020) 596-603
Abstract:
There is a wide-ranging debate about the merits and demerits of searching for, and sending messages to, extraterrestrial intelligences (SETI and METI). There is however reasonable (but not universal) consensus that replying to a message from an extraterrestrial intelligence should not be done unilaterally, without consultation with wider society and the rest of the world. But how should this consultation actually work? In this paper we discuss various ways that decision making in such a scenario could be done democratically, and gain legitimacy. In particular we consider a scientist-led response, a politician-led response, deciding a response using a referendum, and finally using citizens’ assemblies. We present the results of a survey of a representative survey of 2000 people in the UK on how they thought a response should best be determined, and finally discuss parallels to how the public is responding to scientific expertise in the COVID-19 Pandemic.From core collapse to superluminous: the rates of massive stellar explosions from the Palomar Transient Factory
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 500:4 (2020) 5142-5158
MIGHTEE: are giant radio galaxies more common than we thought?
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 501:3 (2020) 3833-3845