JWST/NIRISS and HST: exploring the improved ability to characterise exoplanet atmospheres in the JWST era
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 535:1 (2024) 27-46
Abstract:
The Hubble Space Telescope has been a pioneering instrument for studying the atmospheres of exoplanets, specifically its WFC3 and STIS instruments. With the launch of JWST, we are able to observe larger spectral ranges at higher precision. NIRISS/SOSS covers the range 0.6–2.8 microns, and thus, it can serve as a direct comparison to WFC3 (0.8–1.7 microns). We perform atmospheric retrievals of WFC3 and NIRISS transmission spectra of WASP-39 b in order to compare their constraining power. We find that NIRISS is able to retrieve precise H2O abundances that do not suffer a degeneracy with the continuum level due to the coverage of multiple spectral features. We also combine these data sets with spectra from STIS and find that challenges associated with fitting the steep optical slope can bias the retrieval results. In an effort to diagnose the differences between the WFC3 and NIRISS retrievals, we perform the analysis again on the NIRISS data cut to the same wavelength range as WFC3. We find that the water abundance is in strong disagreement with both the WFC3 and full NIRISS retrievals, highlighting the importance of wide wavelength coverage. Finally, we carry out mock retrievals on the different instruments, which shows further evidence of the challenges in constraining water abundance from the WFC3 data alone. Our study demonstrates the vast information gain of JWST’s NIRISS instrument over WFC3, highlighting the insights to be obtained from our new era of space-based instruments.3D Modeling of Moist Convective Inhibition in Hydrogen-Dominated Atmospheres
(2024)
JWST/NIRISS and HST: Exploring the improved ability to characterise exoplanet atmospheres in the JWST era
(2024)
Bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurements of characterized Apollo regolith samples using the visible oxford space environment goniometer
Meteoritics & Planetary Science Wiley (2024)
Abstract:
A laboratory study was performed using the Visible Oxford Space Environment Goniometer in which the broadband (350–1250 nm) bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs) of two representative Apollo regolith samples were measured, for two surface roughness profiles, across a range of viewing angles—reflectance: 0–70°, in steps of 5°; incidence: 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°; and azimuthal: 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°. The BRDF datasets were fitted using the Hapke BRDF model to (1) provide a method of comparison to other photometric studies of the lunar regolith and (2) to produce Hapke parameter values which can be used to extrapolate the BRDF to all angles. Importantly, the surface profiles of the samples were characterized using an Alicona 3D® instrument, allowing two of the free parameters within the Hapke model, φ and θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , which represent porosity and surface roughness, respectively, to be constrained. The study determined that, for θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , the 500–1000 μm size‐scale is the most relevant for the BRDF. Thus, it deduced the following “best fit” Hapke parameters for each of the samples: Apollo 11 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.315 ± 0.021, b $$ b $$ = 0.261 ± 0.007, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.039 ± 0.005 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.28° and φ = 0.41 ± 0.02); Apollo 11 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.281 ± 0.028, b $$ b $$ = 0.238 ± 0.008, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.032 ± 0.006 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 13.80° and φ = 0.60 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.485 ± 0.155, b $$ b $$ = 0.155 ± 0.083, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.135 ± 0.007 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.69° and φ = 0.55 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.388 ± 0.057, b $$ b $$ = 0.063 ± 0.033, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.221 ± 0.011 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 14.27° and φ = 0.40 ± 0.02). Finally, updated hemispheric albedo functions were determined for the samples, which can be used to set laboratory measured visible scattering functions within thermal models.Relationships Between HCl, H 2 O, Aerosols, and Temperature in the Martian Atmosphere: 2. Quantitative Correlations
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets American Geophysical Union 129:8 (2024) e2024JE008351