ENSO relationship to summer rainfall variability and its potential predictability over Arabian Peninsula region

npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Springer Nature 1:1 (2018) 20171

Authors:

Muhammad Adnan Abid, Mansour Almazroui, Fred Kucharski, Enda O’Brien, Ahmed Elsayed Yousef

Reliable low precision simulations in land surface models

CLIMATE DYNAMICS 51:7-8 (2017) 2657-2666

Authors:

Andrew Dawson, Peter D Dueben, David A MacLeod, Tim N Palmer

Overview of experiment design and comparison of models participating in phase 1 of the SPARC Quasi-Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi)

Geoscientific Model Development Discussions (2017) 1-35

Authors:

N Butchart, JA Anstey, K Hamilton, S Osprey, C McLandress, AC Bushell, Y Kawatani, Y-H Kim, F Lott, J Scinocca, T Stockdale, O Bellprat, P Braesicke, C Cagnazzo, C-C Chen, H-Y Chun, M Dobrynin, RR Garcia, J Garcia-Serrano, LJ Gray, L Holt, T Kerzenmacher, H Naoe, H Pohlmann, JH Richter, AA Scaife, V Schenzinger, F Serva, S Versick, S Watanabe, K Yoshida, S Yukimoto

A simple pedagogical model linking initial-value reliability with trustworthiness in the forced climate response

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society March 2018 (2017) 605-614

Authors:

Timothy Palmer, Antje Weisheimer

Abstract:

Using a simple pedagogical model, it is shown how information about the statistical reliability of initial-value ensemble forecasts can be relevant in assessing the trustworthiness of the climate system’s response to forcing.

Although the development of seamless prediction systems is becoming increasingly common, there is still confusion regarding the relevance of information from initial-value forecasts for assessing the trustworthiness of the climate system’s response to forcing. A simple system which mimics the real climate system through its regime structure is used to illustrate this potential relevance. The more complex version of this model defines “REALITY” and a simplified version of the system represents the “MODEL”. The MODEL’s response to forcing is profoundly incorrect. However, the untrustworthiness of the MODEL’s response to forcing can be deduced from the MODEL’s initial-value unreliability. The nonlinearity of the system is crucial in accounting for this result.

Approximately right or precisely wrong? Meeting report on "Chaos and Confidence in Weather Forecasting'

WEATHER 72:10 (2017) 301-302