The ubiquity of variable radio emission and spin-down rates in pulsars

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) (2025) staf427

Authors:

ME Lower, A Karastergiou, S Johnston, PR Brook, S Dai, M Kerr, RN Manchester, LS Oswald, RM Shannon, C Sobey, P Weltevrede

Anomaly Detection and Radio-frequency Interference Classification with Unsupervised Learning in Narrowband Radio Technosignature Searches

Astronomical Journal American Astronomical Society 169:4 (2025) 206

Authors:

Ben Jacobson-Bell, Steve Croft, Carmen Choza, Alex Andersson, Daniel Bautista, Vishal Gajjar, Matthew Lebofsky, David HE MacMahon, Caleb Painter, Andrew PV Siemion

Abstract:

The search for radio technosignatures is an anomaly detection problem: Candidate signals represent needles of interest in the proverbial haystack of radio-frequency interference (RFI). Current search frameworks find an enormity of false-positive signals, especially in large surveys, requiring manual follow-up to a sometimes prohibitive degree. Unsupervised learning provides an algorithmic way to winnow the most anomalous signals from the chaff, as well as group together RFI signals that bear morphological similarities. We present Grouping Low-frequency Observations By Unsupervised Learning After Reduction (GLOBULAR) clustering, a signal processing method that uses hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (or HDBSCAN) to reduce the false-positive rate and isolate outlier signals for further analysis. When combined with a standard narrowband signal detection and spatial filtering pipeline, such as turboSETI, GLOBULAR clustering offers significant improvements in the false-positive rate over the standard pipeline alone, suggesting dramatic potential for the amelioration of manual follow-up requirements for future large surveys. By removing RFI signals in regions of high spectral occupancy, GLOBULAR clustering may also enable the detection of signals missed by the standard pipeline. We benchmark our method against the C. Choza et al. turboSETI-only search of 97 nearby galaxies at the L band, demonstrating a false-positive hit reduction rate of 93.1% and a false-positive event reduction rate of 99.3%.

Blast waves and reverse shocks: from ultra-relativistic GRBs to moderately relativistic X-ray binaries

(2025)

Authors:

James H Matthews, Alex J Cooper, Lauren Rhodes, Katherine Savard, Rob Fender, Francesco Carotenuto, Fraser J Cowie, Emma L Elley, Joe Bright, Andrew K Hughes, Sara E Motta

Joint Radiative and Kinematic Modelling of X-ray Binary Ejecta: Energy Estimate and Reverse Shock Detection

(2025)

Authors:

AJ Cooper, JH Matthews, F Carotenuto, R Fender, GP Lamb, TD Russell, N Sarin, K Savard

Type I X-ray burst emission reflected into the eclipses of EXO 0748−676

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 538:3 (2025) 2058-2074

Authors:

Amy H Knight, Jakob van den Eijnden, Adam Ingram, James H Matthews, Sara E Motta, Matthew Middleton, Giulio C Mancuso, Douglas JK Buisson, Diego Altamirano, Rob Fender, Timothy P Roberts

Abstract:

The neutron star X-ray binary, EXO 0748−676, was observed regularly by the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) and XMM–Newton during its first detected outburst (1985–2008). These observations captured hundreds of asymmetric, energy-dependent X-ray eclipses, influenced by the ongoing ablation of the companion star and numerous Type I thermonuclear X-ray bursts. Here, we present the light curves of 22 Type I X-ray bursts observed by RXTE that coincide, fully or partially, with an X-ray eclipse. We identify nine instances where the burst occurs entirely within totality, seven bursts split across an egress, and six cases interrupted by an ingress. All in-eclipse and split bursts occurred while the source was in the hard spectral state. We establish that we are not observing direct burst emission during eclipses since the companion star and the ablated outflow entirely obscure our view of the X-ray emitting region. We determine that the reflected flux from the outer accretion disc, even if maximally flared, is insufficient to explain all observations of in-eclipse X-ray bursts and instead explore scenarios whereby the emission arising from the X-ray bursts is scattered, either by a burst-induced rise in that provides extra material, an accretion disc wind or the ablated outflow, into our line of sight. However, the rarity of a burst and eclipse overlap makes it challenging to determine their origin.