XMM-Newton-discovered Fast X-ray Transients: Host galaxies and limits on contemporaneous detections of optical counterparts

(2023)

Authors:

D Eappachen, PG Jonker, J Quirola-Vásquez, D Mata Sánchez, A Inkenhaag, AJ Levan, M Fraser, MAP Torres, FE Bauer, AA Chrimes, D Stern, MJ Graham, SJ Smartt, KW Smith, ME Ravasio, AI Zabludoff, M Yue, F Stoppa, DB Malesani, NC Stone, S Wen

How, where and when do cosmic rays reach ultrahigh energies?

(2023)

Authors:

James H Matthews, Andrew M Taylor

The discovery of a z=0.7092 OH megamaser with the MIGHTEE survey

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 529:4 (2023) 3484-3494

Authors:

Matthew Jarvis, Ian Heywood, Anastasia Ponomareva, Rohan Varadaraj, Imogen Whittam, Hengxing Pan

Abstract:

We present the discovery of the most distant OH megamaser to be observed in the main lines, using data from the MeerKAT International Giga-Hertz Tiered Extragalactic Exploration (MIGHTEE) survey. At a newly measured redshift of 𝑧 = 0.7092, the system has strong emission in both the 1665 MHz (𝐿 ≈ 2500 L⊙) and 1667 MHz (𝐿 ≈ 4.5×104 L⊙) transitions, with both narrow and broad components. We interpret the broad line as a high-velocity-dispersion component of the 1667 MHz transition, with velocity 𝑣 ∼ 330 km s−1 with respect to the systemic velocity. The host galaxy has a stellar mass of 𝑀★ = 2.95 × 1010 M⊙ and a star-formation rate of SFR = 371 M⊙ yr−1 , placing it ∼ 1.5 dex above the main sequence for star-forming galaxies at this redshift, and can be classified as an ultra-luminous infrared galaxy. Alongside the optical imaging data, which exhibits evidence for a tidal tail, this suggests that the OH megamaser arises from a system that is currently undergoing a merger, which is stimulating star formation and providing the necessary conditions for pumping the OH molecule to saturation. The OHM is likely to be lensed, with a magnification factor of ∼ 2.5, and perhaps more if the maser emitting region is compact and suitably offset relative to the centroid of its host galaxy’s optical light. This discovery demonstrates that spectral line mapping with the new generation of radio interferometers may provide important information on the cosmic merger history of galaxies.

Investigating the Lorentz Invariance Violation effect using different cosmological backgrounds

Classical and Quantum Gravity IOP Publishing 41:1 (2023) 015022

Authors:

Hassan Abdalla, Garret Cotter, Michael Backes, Eli Kasai, Markus Böttcher

Abstract:

Familiar concepts in physics, such as Lorentz symmetry, are expected to be broken at energies approaching the Planck energy scale as predicted by several quantum-gravity theories. However, such very large energies are unreachable by current experiments on Earth. Current and future Cherenkov telescope facilities may have the capability to measure the accumulated deformation from Lorentz symmetry for photons traveling over large distances via energy-dependent time delays. One of the best natural laboratories to test Lorentz Invariance Violation~(LIV) signatures are Gamma-ray bursts~(GRBs). The calculation of time delays due to the LIV effect depends on the cosmic expansion history. In almost all previous works calculating time lags due to the LIV effect, the standard $\Lambda$CDM (or concordance) cosmological model is assumed. In this paper, we investigate whether the LIV signature is significantly different when assuming alternatives to the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model. Specifically, we consider cosmological models with a non-trivial dark-energy equation of state ($w \neq -1$), such as the standard Chevallier-Polarski-Linder~(CPL) parameterization, the quadratic parameterization of the dark-energy equation of state, and the Pade parameterizations. We find that the relative difference in the predicted time lags is small, of the order of at most a few percent, and thus likely smaller than the systematic differences of possible measurements currently or in the near future.

NEural Engine for Discovering Luminous Events (NEEDLE): identifying rare transient candidates in real time from host galaxy images

(2023)

Authors:

Xinyue Sheng, Matt Nicholl, Ken W Smith, David R Young, Roy D Williams, Heloise F Stevance, Stephen J Smartt, Shubham Srivastav, Thomas Moore