The star formation rates of QSOs

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 514:3 (2022) 4450-4464

Authors:

M Symeonidis, N Maddox, Mj Jarvis, Mj Michalowski, P Andreani, Dl Clements, G De Zotti, S Duivenvoorden, J Gonzalez-Nuevo, E Ibar, Rj Ivison, L Leeuw, Mj Page, R Shirley, Mwl Smith, M Vaccari

Abstract:

We examine the far-infrared (FIR) properties of a sample of 5391 optically selected QSOs in the 0.5 < z < 2.65 redshift range down to log [νLν, 2500(erg s−1)] > 44.7, using SPIRE data from Herschel-ATLAS. We split the sample in a grid of 74 luminosity–redshift bins and compute the average optical–IR spectral energy distribution (SED) in each bin. By normalizing an intrinsic active galactic nucleus (AGN) template to the AGN optical power (at 5100 Å), we decompose the total IR emission (LIR; 8–1000 µm) into an AGN (LIR, AGN) and star-forming component (LIR, SF). We find that the AGN contribution to LIR increases as a function of AGN power, manifesting as a reduction of the ‘FIR bump’ in the average QSO SEDs. We note that LIR, SF does not correlate with AGN power; the mean star formation rates (SFRs) of AGN host galaxies are a function of redshift only and they range from ∼6 M yr−1 at z ∼ 0 to a plateau of ≲ 200 M yr−1 at z ∼ 2.6. Our results indicate that the accuracy of FIR emission as a proxy for SFR decreases with increasing AGN luminosity. We show that, at any given redshift, observed trends between IR luminosity (whether monochromatic or total) and AGN power (in the optical or X-rays) can be explained by a simple model which is the sum of two components: (i) the IR emission from star formation, uncorrelated with AGN power and (ii) the IR emission from AGN, directly proportional to AGN power in the optical or X-rays.

Determination of the parton distribution functions of the proton using diverse ATLAS data from pp collisions at root √s =7, 8 and 13 TeV

European Physical Journal C Springer Nature 82:5 (2022) 438

Authors:

G Aad, B Abbott, Dc Abbott, A Abed Abud, K Abeling, Dk Abhayasinghe, Sh Abidi, A Aboulhorma, H Abramowicz, H Abreu, Y Abulaiti, Ac Abusleme Hoffman, Bs Acharya, B Achkar, L Adam, C Adam Bourdarios, L Adamczyk, L Adamek, Sv Addepalli, J Adelman, A Adiguzel, S Adorni, T Adye, Aa Affolder, Y Afik, C Agapopoulou, Mn Agaras, J Agarwala, A Aggarwal, C Agheorghiesei, Ja Aguilar-Saavedra, A Ahmad, F Ahmadov, Ws Ahmed, X Ai, G Aielli, I Aizenberg, M Akbiyik, Tpa Akesson, Av Akimov, K Al Khoury, Gl Alberghi, J Albert, P Albicocco, Mj Alconada Verzini, S Alderweireldt, M Aleksa, In Aleksandrov, C Alexa, T Alexopoulos

Abstract:

This paper presents an analysis at next-to-next-to-leading order in the theory of quantum chromodynamics for the determination of a new set of proton parton distribution functions using diverse measurements in pp collisions at √s =7, 8 and 13 TeV, performed by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider, together with deep inelastic scattering data from ep collisions at the HERA collider. The ATLAS data sets considered are differential cross-section measurements of inclusive W± and Z/ γ∗ boson production, W± and Z boson production in association with jets, tt¯ production, inclusive jet production and direct photon production. In the analysis, particular attention is paid to the correlation of systematic uncertainties within and between the various ATLAS data sets and to the impact of model, theoretical and parameterisation uncertainties. The resulting set of parton distribution functions is called ATLASpdf21.

Improved search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in water with the SNO+ detector

(2022)

Authors:

SNO Collaboration, :, A Allega, MR Anderson, S Andringa, M Askins, DJ Auty, A Bacon, N Barros, F Barão, R Bayes, EW Beier, TS Bezerra, A Bialek, SD Biller, E Blucher, E Caden, EJ Callaghan, S Cheng, M Chen, O Chkvorets, B Cleveland, D Cookman, J Corning, MA Cox, R Dehghani, C Deluce, MM Depatie, J Dittmer, KH Dixon, F Di Lodovico, E Falk, N Fatemighomi, R Ford, K Frankiewicz, A Gaur, OI González-Reina, D Gooding, C Grant, J Grove, AL Hallin, D Hallman, J Hartnell, WJ Heintzelman, RL Helmer, J Hu, R Hunt-Stokes, SMA Hussain, AS Inácio, CJ Jillings, T Kaptanoglu, P Khaghani, H Khan, JR Klein, LL Kormos, B Krar, C Kraus, CB Krauss, T Kroupová, I Lam, BJ Land, I Lawson, L Lebanowski, J Lee, C Lefebvre, J Lidgard, YH Lin, V Lozza, M Luo, A Maio, S Manecki, J Maneira, RD Martin, N McCauley, AB McDonald, M Meyer, C Mills, I Morton-Blake, S Naugle, LJ Nolan, HM O'Keeffe, GD Orebi Gann, J Page, W Parker, J Paton, SJM Peeters, L Pickard, P Ravi, A Reichold, S Riccetto, R Richardson, M Rigan, J Rose, J Rumleskie, I Semenec, P Skensved, M Smiley, R Svoboda, B Tam, J Tseng, E Turner, S Valder, JGC Veinot, CJ Virtue, E Vázquez-Jáuregui, J Wang, M Ward, JJ Weigand, JD Wilson, JR Wilson, A Wright, JP Yanez, S Yang, M Yeh, S Yu, T Zhang, Y Zhang, K Zuber, A Zummo

A multi-wavelength study of GRS 1716-249 in outburst : constraints on its system parameters

(2022)

Authors:

Payaswini Saikia, David M Russell, MC Baglio, DM Bramich, Piergiorgio Casella, M Diaz Trigo, Poshak Gandhi, Jiachen Jiang, Thomas Maccarone, Roberto Soria, Hind Al Noori, Aisha Al Yazeedi, Kevin Alabarta, Tomaso Belloni, Marion Cadolle Bel, Chiara Ceccobello, Stephane Corbel, Rob Fender, Elena Gallo, Jeroen Homan, Karri Koljonen, Fraser Lewis, Sera B Markoff, James CA Miller-Jones, Jerome Rodriguez, Thomas D Russell, Tariq Shahbaz, Gregory R Sivakoff, Vincenzo Testa, Alexandra J Tetarenko

A fast and reliable method for the comparison of covariance matrices

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 513:4 (2022) 5438-5445

Authors:

Tassia Ferreira, Valerio Marra

Abstract:

Covariance matrices are important tools for obtaining reliable parameter constraints. Advancements in cosmological surveys lead to larger data vectors and, consequently, increasingly complex covariance matrices, whose number of elements grows as the square of the size of the data vector. The most straightforward way of comparing these matrices, in terms of their ability to produce parameter constraints, involves a full cosmological analysis, which can be very computationally expensive. Using the concept and construction of compression schemes, which have become increasingly popular, we propose a fast and reliable way of comparing covariance matrices. The basic idea is to focus only on the portion of the covariance matrix that is relevant for the parameter constraints and quantify, via a fast Monte Carlo simulation, the difference of a second candidate matrix from the baseline one. To test this method, we apply it to two covariance matrices that were used to analyse the cosmic shear measurements for the Dark Energy Survey Year 1. We found that the uncertainties on the parameters change by 2.6 per cent, a figure in agreement with the full cosmological analysis. While our approximate method cannot replace a full analysis, it may be useful during the development and validation of codes that estimate covariance matrices. Our method takes roughly 100 times less CPUh than a full cosmological analysis.