Space instrumentation

Research group

Research theme

Sub department

About

Fine Layering Effects on Thermal Infrared Emissivity of CI Simulant Materials 

(2026)

Authors:

Emma-Catherine Belhadfa, Neil Bowles, Katherine Shirley

Abstract:

Introduction: Thermal infrared emissivity measurements of asteroid regolith analogs are challenging owing to atmospheric water vapor absorption, sample heating requirements, and the need for controlled atmospheric conditions [1], yet they provide fundamental constraints on surface thermal properties that cannot be obtained from reflectance spectroscopy alone [1]. While diffuse reflectance measurements have demonstrated that minimal fine dust coverage can dominate spectral signatures [2], spacecraft-based thermal emission instruments like the OSIRIS-REx Thermal Emission Spectrometer (OTES) observe different physical processes related to thermal emission rather than scattered light [3]. The disconnect between laboratory studies and spacecraft observations has thus limited our ability to interpret thermal infrared spectra of asteroid surfaces. Previous work using Space Resource Technology's CI simulant showed that 7-10 wt% fine dust coverage could impose fine-dominated reflectance features on coarse substrates [2], but the corresponding thermal emission properties remained uncharacterized. To bridge this gap, we conducted systematic thermal emissivity measurements of layered CI simulant materials using Oxford’s PASCALE instrument [4] under nitrogen atmosphere, constraining how dust deposition mechanisms affect the thermal emission processes observed by spacecraft instruments at airless bodies like asteroid (101955) Bennu. Methods: We measured thermal emission of layered CI simulant [5] samples using PASCALE under nitrogen atmosphere across 2000-400 cm⁻¹ (5-25 µm), eliminating atmospheric water vapor interference. Six layering configurations were tested, using 10 wt% fines (5% emissivity variations from unity), while the fluffy group shows more subdued but consistent spectral signatures. All method-dependent variations exceed the 2% measurement precision, demonstrating that dust deposition mechanism leaves diagnostic thermal emission signatures that can distinguish (and potentially identify) natural surface processes on airless body surfaces. Discussion: The separation between fluffy and compact layering methods demonstrates that thermal emission spectroscopy can distinguish surface formation processes on airless bodies. These results provide constraints missing from reflectance-only studies, by characterizing thermal emission properties relevant to spacecraft observations like OTES. The ability to spectrally distinguish between natural deposition processes offers new frameworks for understanding regolith evolution and thermophysical properties on asteroid surfaces. Summary: This study establishes thermal emissivity as a diagnostic tool for identifying dust deposition mechanisms on asteroid surfaces, demonstrating that layering processes leave distinct spectral signatures. References: [1] Salisbury et al. (1991) Icarus 92, 280-297. [2] Belhadfa et al. (2026) MaPs, In Prep. [3] Christensen P. R. et al. (2018) Space Science Reviews (Vol. 214, Issue 5). [4] Donaldson Hanna et al. (2019) Icarus 319, 701-723. [5] Landsman Z. et al. (2020) EPSC.  
More details from the publisher

Galileo PPR Thermal Inertia & Albedo Measurements of Europa, Ganymede and Callisto

(2026)

Authors:

Sarah Howes, Carly Howett, Duncan Lyster

Abstract:

IntroductionThe presence of endogenic hotspots provides a measure of the level of geologic activity of icy moons, since they are indicative of ongoing resurfacing processes. However, to avoid misinterpreting thermal abnormalities, it is first necessary to understand passive thermal emission that is governed by the physical structure of materials. Two important thermophysical properties in such analysis are bolometric Bond albedo and thermal inertia: if diurnal temperature variations can be accurately modeled by adjusting these two parameters, a passive rather than endogenic origin is possible. In this work, we aim to constrain the thermal inertia and Bond albedo across the surfaces of Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto using brightness temperature observations recorded by the Galileo Photopolarimeter-Radiometer (PPR) instrument [1]. By presenting estimated values and their uncertainties for these thermophysical properties, we prepare for future thermal measurements carried out by both Europa Clipper and JUICE.MethodsWe first take average diurnal temperatures of the surfaces of Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto using brightness temperatures recorded by PPR. In this analysis, we use 29 datasets for Europa, notably increased beyond previous efforts [2], comparable to [3].  With less observations available, only 7 datasets each were used for both Ganymede and Callisto. By translating the observed radiance into brightness temperatures, the variation in temperature with local time is determined for latitude and longitude bins across each of the three moons. These diurnal curves are compared to those predicted by a 1-D thermal model [4] to determine what thermal inertias and Bond albedos can fit the data within a reduced chi-squared cut-off of χ2red ≤1.0. This analysis is used to extensively quantify the uncertainty of the two thermophysical parameters derived from PPR data.ResultsEuropa: Ensuring closed upper and lower limits within our χ2red cut-off, we map albedo and thermal inertia for 33% and 24% of Europa's surface area into 6°x6° latitude/longitude bins (Fig. 1, left). We find a range of 0.375-0.75 for albedo and 20-110 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 (MKS) for thermal inertia, agreeing with [2] and [3]. Our uncertainty analysis indicates well-constrained estimates for albedo, with the average higher and lower ranges overlapping within their uncertainties: Ahigh = 0.11 ± 0.06 and Alow = 0.18 ± 0.12. Uncertainties for thermal inertia remain poorly constrained, with average higher and lower ranges being ­Γhigh = 103(+153/-103) MKS and Γ­low = 17 ± 9 MKS.Ganymede: Due to less available surface coverage, Ganymede’s surface is divided into 18°x6° longitude/latitude bins in order to meet the diurnal fitting routine requirements (Fig. 1, right). Preliminary results indicate the Bond albedo remains nearly uniform, with an average of 0.42 ± 0.07 across the surface and agreeing well with previous work [6]. Specifically, our χ2red-deduced higher and lower uncertainty ranges of albedo are: Ahigh = 0.10 ± 0.06 and Alow = 0.14 ± 0.08. No apparent distinct surface variations in thermal inertia are as of yet discerned, with global values distributed across a range of 20-70 MKS. Upper limit thermal inertia estimates align with [6] within χ2red-deduced uncertainty ranges of ­Γhigh = 57 ± 35 MKS and Γ­low = 25 ± 11 MKS.Callisto: With less PPR coverage available, Callisto fits are performed across grouped hemispheric regions, where the Jovian and anti-Jovian hemispheres are analyzed separately. Each hemisphere is divided into 10° latitude strips. Preliminary results for thermal inertia and Bond albedo indicate an overall agreement with lower-bound estimations from previous literature [5,6]. Further constraints are expected to be obtained at the time of the conference.ConclusionThese results give an indication of the albedo and thermal inertia variation across Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. They aid in preparing for the arrival of Europa Clipper and JUICE to the Jupiter system by improving estimates for passive surface thermal properties and providing uncertainties of their values. This will enable future work to help discern what temperatures may lie above those expected from passive emission alone, providing a critical first step in the search for endogenic heating anomalies. Future work aims to refine the Ganymede and Callisto calculations using a two-component (ice and non-ice) analysis, and characterize the causes behind thermal inertia variations by modeling microphysical ice states for the three Galilean moons.Fig. 1: Thermal Inertia (top) and Bond albedo (bottom) map of Europa (left) and preliminary results for Ganymede (right).[1] Russell, E.E. et al., 1992. Space Sci Rev 60, 531-563.; [2] Rathbun, J.A. et al., 2010. Icarus 210, 763-769.; [3] Lange, L. et al., 2026. arXiv:2604.14374; [4] Lyster, D. et al., 2025. pp. EPSC-DPS2025-1479; [5] Meyer, C. et al., 2026. Planet. Sci. J. 7, 10; [6] Spencer, J.R. et al., 1989. Icarus 78(2), 337-354.
More details from the publisher

Investigating the Detectability of Subsurface Lunar Water-Ice Beneath Regolith Dust Using Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy

(2026)

Authors:

Fiona Henderson, Neil Bowles, Katherine Shirley, Jon Temple, Henry Eshbaugh

Abstract:

Hydration on the lunar surface has been widely identified in orbital datasets (e.g., M³, LCROSS, LAMP), yet the physical form, abundance, and spatial distribution of lunar volatiles remain poorly constrained. Interpretation is complicated by fine-grained regolith, which modifies local thermophysical conditions, obscures underlying volatiles, and alters diagnostic spectral features through scattering and photometric effects. These uncertainties are particularly significant for permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) and high latitudes , where temperatures below ~120 K may preserve water-ice over geological timescales and where several upcoming missions (e.g., Chang’e-7, PROSPECT, CLPS payloads, LEAP) aim to investigate insitu volatiles.We present the development of the Polar Analogue of Dust Overlying Regolith–Ice (PANDOR-I), a demountable laboratory vacuum chamber designed to simulate lunar polar conditions for infrared studies of water-ice and regolith mixtures. The system is engineered to operate under high vacuum and cryogenic conditions (~10⁻⁶ mbar; ≤120 K) and supports variable illumination geometries relevant to polar environments. PANDOR-I operates in two configurations: (1) coupled to a Bruker Vertex 70v FTIR spectrometer for laboratory reflectance measurements across 1.8–20 µm, and (2) integrated with existing flight-instrument thermal-vacuum facilities to enable direct observations by flight-ready infrared instruments.As an initial experimental phase prior to full cryogenic integration, the FTIR sample compartment has been isolated using KBr windows to enable controlled low-pressure (~0.2 mbar) reflectance measurements of hydrated and anhydrous regolith analogue configurations. These preliminary experiments investigate how dust layering, grain size, regolith maturity, composition, ice abundance, and mixing state influence the spectral expression of hydration features, with emphasis on the ~3 µm O–H stretching region and the diagnostic ~6 µm H–O–H bending mode of molecular water. Laboratory spectra will additionally be compared with Mie–Hapke forward models to examine band depth suppression, spectral mixing behaviour, and detectability thresholds under dusty polar conditions.This work reviews the laboratory framework for constraining infrared water-ice detection limits under mission-relevant lunar conditions and provides initial calibration datasets relevant to upcoming orbital and surface investigations of lunar polar volatiles.1. Honniball, C.I., Lucey, P.G., Hayne, P.O., Little, R.C., Greenhagen, B.T., Malespin, C. and Orlando, T.M., 2021. Molecular water detected on the sunlit Moon by SOFIA. Nature Astronomy, 5(2), pp.121–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01222-x2. Saal, A.E., Hauri, E.H., Cascio, M.L., Van Orman, J.A., Rutherford, M.C. and Cooper, R.F., 2008. Volatile content of lunar volcanic glasses and the presence of water in the Moon’s interior. Nature, 454(7201), pp.192–195. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature070473. Buffo, J.J., Shepherd, J.D., Xu, J., Whisner, C., Devore, E., Shay, P. and Crites, S.T., 2025. Quantifying Regolith Cover Effects on 3 and 6 µm Water Ice Bands. 56th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Abstract 2152.4. Pieters, C.M., Goswami, J.N., Clark, R.N., Annadurai, M., Boardman, J., Buratti, B., Cheek, L., Dhingra, D.K., Green, R.O., Head, J.W., Hiesinger, H., Hypki, A., Isaacson, P., Jolliff, B.L., Klima, R.L., Kramer, G., Kumar, S., Lawrence, S.J., LeCorre, L., Li, S., Malaret, E., Mustard, J.F., Petro, N.E., Robinson, M.S., Samuelson, J., Sundaram, C.N. and Taylor, L.A., 2009. Character and spatial distribution of OH/H₂O on the surface of the Moon seen by M³ on Chandrayaan-1. Science, 326(5952), pp.568–572. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11786585. McCord, T.B., Taylor, L.A., Combe, J.P., Klima, R.L., Tighe, R., Murray, K., Hayne, P.O., Clark, R.N., Pieters, C.M., Sunshine, J.M., Mellon, M.T., Hargraves, R.B., Dyar, M.D., Bussey, D.B.J., Paige, D.A. and Orlando, T.M., 2011. Sources and processes responsible for OH/H₂O in lunar soil. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 116(E10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JE0037116. Ehlmann, B.L., Calvin, W.M., Bowles, N.E., Donaldson Hanna, K.L., Green, R.O., Greenhagen, B.T. and Shirley, K.A., 2022. Lunar Trailblazer: A pathfinding mission for lunar water and the lunar surface composition. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 37(11), pp.6–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.98436637. Bowles, N.E., Thomas, I.R., Calcutt, S.B., Donaldson Hanna, K.L., Ehlmann, B.L., Greenhagen, B.T. and Shirley, K.A., 2020. Lunar Thermal Mapper: Characterising the lunar surface in the mid-infrared. 51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Abstract 1380.8. Colaprete, A., Schultz, P., Heldmann, J., Wooden, D., Ennico, K., Hermalyn, B., Marshall, W., Ricco, A., Shirley, M., Vergoz, J. and Yeomans, D., 2010. Detection of water in the LCROSS ejecta plume. Science, 330(6003), pp.463–468. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11869869. Ogishima, A., Saiki, K., Okubo, A. and Sasaki, S., 2021. Development of a laboratory apparatus to reproduce lunar polar surface environment and measurements of reflectance spectra of frost on the regolith. Icarus, 358, 114192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114192
More details from the publisher

Modelling interactions with ice to understand the seasonal variation of HCl

(2026)

Authors:

Bethan Gregory, Kevin Olsen, Ehouarn Millour, Megan Brown, Kylash Rajendran, Paul Streeter, Manish Patel, Franck Lefèvre

Abstract:

Despite constituting a tiny fraction of the Mars atmosphere, trace gases can play an important role in controlling atmospheric chemical cycling. However, some discrepancies between observed distributions of trace gases and modelled values indicate that there are ongoing processes in Mars’ atmosphere that are not fully understood.Hydrogen chloride (HCl) was the first new gas detected by the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO)[1,2], with observations from the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) and Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery (NOMAD) instruments showing a strong seasonal variation over the last several Mars years. With a few exceptions, detections almost exclusively occur during the second half of the year (at solar longitudes between 180° and 360°). This is during southern hemisphere spring and summer, when temperatures, atmospheric dust content, and water vapour concentrations are higher, and ozone concentrations are low. Previous modelling has shown that heterogeneous chemical reactions involving dust or ice aerosols play a key role in controlling this seasonal pattern[3,4,5,6].Here we use the Mars Planetary Climate Model[7,8], a 3-D global circulation model with photochemistry, to investigate some potential sources and sinks of HCl in the Martian atmosphere, which could account for the seasonal variation in measurements and the observed correlations and anticorrelations with other atmospheric factors. Firstly, we examine the indirect effect of heterogeneous chemistry of OH and HO2 interacting with ice. We compare the effect of two different heterogeneous chemical schemes[9,10] on HCl distributions via their effect on other oxidative species such as O and O3. Secondly, we investigate the isolated effects of two further heterogeneous pathways involving water ice—one HCl source and one sink. Specifically, we model the uptake of HCl onto water ice, which has been studied before, and its subsequent release back to the atmosphere during ice sublimation, which has not been included in previous models.Our preliminary results (e.g., Figure 1) show that the latter cycling could account for some of the seasonality of the HCl observations. HCl concentrations remain close to the ground during the first half of the year, and then increase at higher altitudes during the second half of the year, where they could be detected by TGO's instruments. Even without the addition of other HCl sources and sinks in the model, we expect this pattern to be repeated over multiple Mars years, reproducing at least part of the annual appearance and disappearance of HCl through the recycling of chlorine.Continuing to reconcile models and observations of the cycling of HCl and other trace gases is important for achieving a more complete understanding of atmospheric processes operating on Mars today, as well as those that have played a key role over Mars’ history.Figure 1: Preliminary model results showing seasonal distributions of HCl over more than one Mars year. Each panel shows zonally-averaged HCl volume mixing ratios with altitude and latitude, and there are 30° of solar longitude between each panel. The black contour indicates a mixing ratio of 0.5 ppbv, which is the detection limit for TGO ACS.[1] Korablev O. I. et al. (2021). Sci. Adv., 7, eabe4386. [2] Olsen K. S. et al. (2021). Astron. Astrophys., 647, A161. [3] Benne, B., et al. (2025). Astron. Astrophys., 699, A362. [4] Rajendran, K. et al. (2025). JGR: Planets 130(3), p.e2024JE008537. [5] Streeter, P. M. et al. (2025). GRL 52(6), p.e2024GL111059. [6] Taysum, B. M. et al. (2024). Astron. Astrophys., 687, A191. [7] Forget, F., et al. (1999). JGR: Planets 104, E10. [8] Lefèvre, F., et al. (2004). JGR: Planets 109, E7. [9] Brown M. A. J. et al. (2022). JGR: Planets, 127, p.e2022JE007346. [10] Lefèvre, F., et al. (2021) JGR: Planets, 126, p.e2021JE006838.
More details from the publisher

MoonTools: A Framework for Hyperspectral Data Processing and Parameter Retrieval

(2026)

Authors:

Henry Eshbaugh, Katherine Shirley, Fiona Henderson, Namrah Habib, Emma Belhadfa, Robert Spry, Kevin Olsen, Neil Bowles

Abstract:

MoonTools is a software framework, written in the Julia programming language [9], allowing straightforward, flexible, and performant processing of multispectral and hyperspectral data products. Designed originally to operate on M3 observations [4, 5], our framework is readily extensible to a wide range of datasets.Drawing from functional programming [6], our framework emphasizes composition of disparate operations. Processing pipelines are constructed in native Julia, parametrised by partial function application. This approach allows for flexibility of use and ease of extensibility, and distinguishes our work from similar tools, e.g. [7]; further, Julia’s just-in-time compilation  and parallel-programming tools allow for fast, multithreaded operations on multi-terabyte datasets, including for user-supplied inputs.Implemented operations include thermal and photometric corrections of multispectral radiance cubes, reflectance retrievals, spectral parameter determination, and post-processing amongst others. Additional utilities allow users to search datasets for targets by nomenclature, terrain type, and local solar time. Various dataset export options are available, including HDF5 products and “at a glance” views of regions of interest.We provide an example Julia pipeline in Listing 1, reproducing the detection of spinel at Theophilus crater [1,2]. We begin by importing the MoonTools package; then, we define a RATIO parameter expression. The spectral parameters SPINEL and PYROXENE are implemented as in [2] up to a constant factor using the RATIO definition. Invoked macros produce multithreaded CPU and GPU-kernel implementations of these parameters transparently to the user. Finally, a pipeline is composed: we search M3 data for observations of Theophilus crater, apply parameters, and produce “quicklook” plots of all matching observations; one such plot is shown in Figure 1.Listing 1: Pipeline invocation, including parameter definitions, required to produce Figure 1.using MoonTools@paramdef RATIO(λs, R; λ1, λ2) = sum(R[λ1]) / sum(R[λ2])@param SPINEL   RATIO [1400]       [1750]@param PYROXENE RATIO [0700, 1200] [0950]observations(:m3) > by_name("Theophilus") > PYROXENE > SPINEL > quicklookFigure 1: One of several quicklook outputs, showing Theophilus crater. Quicklooks are intended to provide overviews of regions of interest (RoIs) indicated by pipeline construction. Plots on the left include a reference narrowband reflectance, and PYROXENE and SPINEL parameter maps across the RoI. The RoI is partitioned into a 3x3 grid of zones; spectra sampled from each zone are plotted on the right in corresponding positions.Striping artifacts exist throughout the M3 dataset, and are prominent in spectral parameter products; state-of-the-art tooling must destripe these images [7,8]. We provide a bespoke destriping algorithm using a wavelet packet decomposition [3]. The modified pipeline is given in Listing 2; a destriped spinel map is shown in Figure 2.Listing 2: Pipeline altered from Listing 1; outputs are shown in Figure 2.observations(:m3) > by_name("Theophilus") > SPINEL > destripe!Figure 2: Destriped spinel parameter map. The before and after of the destriping operation are shown in the left and center plots; the removed signal is shown on the right.Software development is progressing rapidly. We anticipate a release of MoonTools to the scientific community in the coming months; MoonTools will be distributed under the terms of an open-source software license. We will welcome bug reports, feature requests, and contributions.References[1] Dhingra, D., Pieters, C.M., Boardman, J.W., Head, J.W., Isaacson, P.J. and Taylor, L.A., 2011. Compositional diversity at Theophilus Crater: Understanding the Geological Context of Mg‐Spinel-Bearing Central Peaks. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(11).[2] Pieters, C.M., Hanna, K.D., Cheek, L., Dhingra, D., Prissel, T., Jackson, C., Moriarty, D., Parman, S. and Taylor, L.A., 2014. The distribution of Mg-spinel across the Moon and constraints on crustal origin. American Mineralogist, 99(10), pp.1893-1910.[3] Mallat, S., 1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Elsevier.[4] Chandrayaan-1 Moon Mineralogy Mapper Science Team (2011). M3 L1B Gridded Spectral Radiance, Version 3. PDS Cartography and Imaging Sciences Node. https://doi.org/10.17189/1520248.[5] Chandrayaan-1 Moon Mineralogy Mapper Science Team (2011). L2 Gridded Spectral Reflectance (version 1) products. https://doi.org/10.17189/1520414.[6] Backus, J., 1978. Can Programming be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? A Functional Style and its Algebra of Programs. Communications of the ACM, 21(8), pp.613-641.[7] Suárez‐Valencia, J.E., Rossi, A.P., Zambon, F., Carli, C. and Nodjoumi, G., 2024. MoonIndex, an open‐source tool to generate spectral indexes for the moon from M3 data. Earth and Space Science, 11(6), p.e2023EA003464.[8] Shkuratov, Y., Surkov, Y., Ivanov, M., Korokhin, V., Kaydash, V., Videen, G., Pieters, C. and Stankevich, D., 2019. Improved Chandrayaan-1 M3 data: A northwest portion of the Aristarchus Plateau and contiguous maria. Icarus, 321, pp.34-49.[9] Bezanson, J., Karpinski, S., Shah, V.B. and Edelman, A., 2012. Julia: A Fast, Dynamic Language for Technical Computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.5145.
More details from the publisher