The Visual Monitoring Camera (VMC) on Mars Express: A new science instrument made from an old webcam orbiting Mars

Planetary and Space Science Elsevier 251 (2024) 105972

Authors:

Jorge Hernández-Bernal, Alejandro Cardesín-Moinelo, Ricardo Hueso, Eleni Ravanis, Abel Burgos-Sierra, Simon Wood, Marc Costa-Sitja, Alfredo Escalante, Emmanuel Grotheer, Julia Marín-Yaseli de la Parra, Donald Merrit, Miguel Almeida, Michel Breitfellner, Mar Sierra, Patrick Martin, Dmitri Titov, Colin Wilson, Ethan Larsen, Teresa del Río-Gaztelurrutia, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega

3D Modeling of Moist Convective Inhibition in Hydrogen-Dominated Atmospheres

(2024)

Authors:

Namrah Habib, Raymond T Pierrehumbert

Bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurements of characterized Apollo regolith samples using the visible oxford space environment goniometer

Meteoritics & Planetary Science Wiley (2024)

Authors:

RJ Curtis, TJ Warren, KA Shirley, DA Paige, NE Bowles

Abstract:

A laboratory study was performed using the Visible Oxford Space Environment Goniometer in which the broadband (350–1250 nm) bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs) of two representative Apollo regolith samples were measured, for two surface roughness profiles, across a range of viewing angles—reflectance: 0–70°, in steps of 5°; incidence: 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°; and azimuthal: 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°. The BRDF datasets were fitted using the Hapke BRDF model to (1) provide a method of comparison to other photometric studies of the lunar regolith and (2) to produce Hapke parameter values which can be used to extrapolate the BRDF to all angles. Importantly, the surface profiles of the samples were characterized using an Alicona 3D® instrument, allowing two of the free parameters within the Hapke model, φ and θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , which represent porosity and surface roughness, respectively, to be constrained. The study determined that, for θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , the 500–1000 μm size‐scale is the most relevant for the BRDF. Thus, it deduced the following “best fit” Hapke parameters for each of the samples: Apollo 11 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.315 ± 0.021, b $$ b $$ = 0.261 ± 0.007, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.039 ± 0.005 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.28° and φ = 0.41 ± 0.02); Apollo 11 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.281 ± 0.028, b $$ b $$ = 0.238 ± 0.008, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.032 ± 0.006 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 13.80° and φ = 0.60 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.485 ± 0.155, b $$ b $$ = 0.155 ± 0.083, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.135 ± 0.007 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.69° and φ = 0.55 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.388 ± 0.057, b $$ b $$ = 0.063 ± 0.033, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.221 ± 0.011 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 14.27° and φ = 0.40 ± 0.02). Finally, updated hemispheric albedo functions were determined for the samples, which can be used to set laboratory measured visible scattering functions within thermal models.

HARMONI at ELT: High Precision Cryogenic Mechanisms for HARMONI Spectrographs

SPIE, the international society for optics and photonics (2024) 273

Authors:

Edgar Castillo Dominguez, Ian J Lewis, James Kariuki, Matthias Tecza, Fraser Clarke, R Elliot Meyer, Zeynep Ozer, Eduard R Muslimov, Sophie Paszynska, Kieran McCall, Vanessa Ferraro-Wood, Liam Boland, David Gooding, Jorge Chao-Ortiz, Niranjan A Thatte

HARMONI at ELT: SCAO performance analysis

SPIE, the international society for optics and photonics (2024) 126

Authors:

Charlotte Z Bond, Jean-François Sauvage, Romain Fétick, Noah Schwartz, Mojtaba Taheri, Cédric Taïssir Héritier, Timothy Morris, Thierry Fusco, Benoît Neichel, Fraser Clarke, Niranjan Thatte