Observations of Uranus at High Phase Angle as Seen by New Horizons

The Planetary Science Journal American Astronomical Society 5:12 (2024) 267

Authors:

Samantha N Hasler, LC Mayorga, William M Grundy, Amy A Simon, Susan D Benecchi, Carly JA Howett, Silvia Protopapa, Heidi B Hammel, Daniel D Wenkert, S Alan Stern, Kelsi N Singer, Simon B Porter, Pontus C Brandt, Joel W Parker, Anne J Verbiscer, John R Spencer, The New Horizons Planetary Science Theme Team

Observations of Uranus at High Phase Angle as Seen by New Horizons

(2024)

Authors:

Samantha N Hasler, LC Mayorga, William M Grundy, Amy A Simon, Susan D Benecchi, Carly JA Howett, Silvia Protopapa, Heidi B Hammel, Daniel D Wenkert, S Alan Stern, Kelsi N Singer, Simon B Porter, Pontus C Brandt, Joel W Parker, Anne J Verbiscer, John R Spencer, the New Horizons Planetary Science Theme Team

The Visual Monitoring Camera (VMC) on Mars Express: A new science instrument made from an old webcam orbiting Mars

Planetary and Space Science Elsevier 251 (2024) 105972

Authors:

Jorge Hernández-Bernal, Alejandro Cardesín-Moinelo, Ricardo Hueso, Eleni Ravanis, Abel Burgos-Sierra, Simon Wood, Marc Costa-Sitja, Alfredo Escalante, Emmanuel Grotheer, Julia Marín-Yaseli de la Parra, Donald Merrit, Miguel Almeida, Michel Breitfellner, Mar Sierra, Patrick Martin, Dmitri Titov, Colin Wilson, Ethan Larsen, Teresa del Río-Gaztelurrutia, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega

3D Modeling of Moist Convective Inhibition in Hydrogen-Dominated Atmospheres

(2024)

Authors:

Namrah Habib, Raymond T Pierrehumbert

Bidirectional reflectance distribution function measurements of characterized Apollo regolith samples using the visible oxford space environment goniometer

Meteoritics & Planetary Science Wiley (2024)

Authors:

RJ Curtis, TJ Warren, KA Shirley, DA Paige, NE Bowles

Abstract:

A laboratory study was performed using the Visible Oxford Space Environment Goniometer in which the broadband (350–1250 nm) bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs) of two representative Apollo regolith samples were measured, for two surface roughness profiles, across a range of viewing angles—reflectance: 0–70°, in steps of 5°; incidence: 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°; and azimuthal: 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°. The BRDF datasets were fitted using the Hapke BRDF model to (1) provide a method of comparison to other photometric studies of the lunar regolith and (2) to produce Hapke parameter values which can be used to extrapolate the BRDF to all angles. Importantly, the surface profiles of the samples were characterized using an Alicona 3D® instrument, allowing two of the free parameters within the Hapke model, φ and θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , which represent porosity and surface roughness, respectively, to be constrained. The study determined that, for θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ , the 500–1000 μm size‐scale is the most relevant for the BRDF. Thus, it deduced the following “best fit” Hapke parameters for each of the samples: Apollo 11 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.315 ± 0.021, b $$ b $$ = 0.261 ± 0.007, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.039 ± 0.005 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.28° and φ = 0.41 ± 0.02); Apollo 11 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.281 ± 0.028, b $$ b $$ = 0.238 ± 0.008, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.032 ± 0.006 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 13.80° and φ = 0.60 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 rough— w $$ w $$ = 0.485 ± 0.155, b $$ b $$ = 0.155 ± 0.083, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.135 ± 0.007 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 21.69° and φ = 0.55 ± 0.02); Apollo 16 smooth— w $$ w $$ = 0.388 ± 0.057, b $$ b $$ = 0.063 ± 0.033, and h S $$ {h}_S $$ = 0.221 ± 0.011 (with θ ¯ $$ \overline{\theta} $$ = 14.27° and φ = 0.40 ± 0.02). Finally, updated hemispheric albedo functions were determined for the samples, which can be used to set laboratory measured visible scattering functions within thermal models.