Solar system

Abstract:

Here we present new constraints on Uranus’s and Neptune’s externally sourced stratospheric water abundance using disk-averaged observations of the 557 GHz emission line from Herschel’s Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared. Derived stratospheric column water abundances are × 1014 cm−2 for Uranus and ×1014 cm−2 for Neptune, consistent with previous determinations using ISO-SWS and Herschel-PACS. For Uranus, excellent observational fits are obtained by scaling photochemical model profiles or with step-type profiles with water vapor limited to ≤0.6 mbar. However, Uranus’s cold stratospheric temperatures imply a ∼0.03 mbar condensation level, which further limits water vapor to pressures ≤0.03 mbar. Neptune’s warmer stratosphere has a deeper ∼1 mbar condensation level, so emission-line pressure broadening can be used to further constrain the water profile. For Neptune, excellent fits are obtained using step-type profiles with cutoffs of ∼0.3–0.6 mbar or by scaling a photochemical model profile. Step-type profiles with cutoffs ≥1.0 mbar or ≤0.1 mbar can be rejected with 4σ significance. Rescaling photochemical model profiles from Moses & Poppe to match our observed column abundances implies similar external water fluxes for both planets: × 104 cm−2 s−1 for Uranus and ×104 cm−2 s−1 for Neptune. This suggests that Neptune’s ∼4 times greater observed water column abundance is primarily caused by its warmer stratosphere preventing loss by condensation, rather than by a significantly more intense external source. To reconcile these water fluxes with other stratospheric oxygen species (CO and CO2) requires either a significant CO component in interplanetary dust particles (Uranus) or contributions from cometary impacts (Uranus, Neptune)

Abstract:

Charon's exosphere may exhibit extreme seasonal dynamics, with centuries of quiescence punctuated by short lived (∼4 earth years) exospheric surges near the equinoxes, as spring sunrise bi-annually drives frozen methane off the polar night zones. Charon's pole-centric red spot has been proposed to be the product of Ly-α photolysis of frozen methane into refractory hydrocarbon “tholins”, but the role of exospheric dynamics in the red material's formation has not been investigated. We show with exospheric modeling that methane “polar-swap”, in which exospheric CH4 sublimated from the spring polar zone is rapidly re-frozen onto the autumn hemisphere, deposits ∼30 μm polar frosts too thick for Ly-α light to penetrate. Ethane, the primary methane photoproduct under these conditions, may unlike methane remain frozen decades after polar sunrise under solar wind exposure. Solar wind radiolysis of polar ethane frost synthesizes higher-order refractories that may contribute to the coloration of Charon's polar zones.

Abstract:

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present an analysis of all currently available ground-based imaging of Neptune in the mid-infrared. Dating between 2003 and 2020, the images reveal changes in Neptune’s mid-infrared (∼8–25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) emission over time in the years surrounding Neptune’s 2005 southern summer solstice. Images sensitive to stratospheric ethane (∼12 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), methane (∼8 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), and CH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>D (∼9 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) display significant subseasonal temporal variation on regional and global scales. Comparison with H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> S(1) hydrogen quadrupole (∼17.035 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) spectra suggests that these changes are primarily related to stratospheric temperature changes. The stratosphere appears to have cooled between 2003 and 2009 across multiple filtered wavelengths, followed by a dramatic warming of the south pole between 2018 and 2020. Conversely, upper-tropospheric temperatures—inferred from ∼17 to 25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m imaging—appear invariant during this period, except for the south pole, which appeared warmest between 2003 and 2006. We discuss the observed variability in the context of seasonal forcing, tropospheric meteorology, and the solar cycle. Collectively, these data provide the strongest evidence to date that processes produce subseasonal variation on both global and regional scales in Neptune’s stratosphere.</jats:p>