Bridging multi-annual to seasonal forecasts to develop seamless information for climate extremes: frost risk application
npj Natural Hazards Springer Nature (2026)
Abstract:
We propose a new temporal merging method for seamless climate forecast information of climate extremes. In order to construct stable and seamless climate forecast information for user-oriented climate extremes, ensemble members are pooled across available start dates using relative weights, for a target season. Recently, vineyard farmers from Catalonia, Spain, reported frost risk during the spring months (March and April). The observations show high interannual variability of the frequency of frost days (FFD) over Catalonia for the period 1983–2022. Multi-annual to seasonal forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts show a varying level of FFD forecast skill for lead times 1 to 22 months. The temporally merged weighted forecast enhances forecast skill compared to individual start dates, by adding information from previous start dates, at no additional computational cost. For most start dates, the skill is primarily attributed to the warming trends, except for a few start dates, where remanent forecast skill is attributed to internal variability. The proposed anticipatory framework “Ready-Steady-Action/Go” shows that adopting seamless climate forecast information can bring about 20 to 30% potential economic value for vineyard farmers, with a maximum value noted for multi-annual forecasts.Sensitivity of the ECMWF seasonal forecast model to CO2 and anthropogenic aerosol forcings: Experimental design and impact on climate trends
(2026)
Combining Observations, Forecasts and Projections into Seamless Climate Information: Recent Advances and Insights in User Applications
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society (2026)
Multi-method extreme event attribution: Motivation, case study, and implications
Copernicus Publications (2026)
Abstract:
Since 2004, many methods for event attribution have been developed. Early studies showed that attribution statements are sensitive to the framing of research questions but few large comparisons have been undertaken.Here, we firstly motivate the need for multi-method extreme event attribution, highlighting conceptual differences between methods. In a second part, we present a case study of midlatitude storm Babet (2023) to compare three common storyline attribution methods, alongside a severity-based probabilistic method. We discuss three widely relevant questions which highlight the complementarity and the differences between methods: (1) How has climate change impacted the frequency of the event? (2) How has climate change impacted the event severity? (3) Were the dynamics of the event influenced by climate change and if yes, how?We show that methods differ in the extent to which they reproduce observed weather patterns. This influences attribution statements, and can even change the sign of results for events with uncertain climate signals. We argue that limitations and strengths of methods need to be clearly communicated when presenting event attribution reports to ensure findings can be used reliably by a wide range of stakeholders.Relative Humidity Verification Over Vietnam in ECMWF Medium‐Range Forecasts for a Dengue Early Warning System
Meteorological Applications Wiley 33:1 (2026) ARTN e70159