Measurement of the mass difference m(Ds+)-m(D +) at CDF II

Physical Review D 68:7 (2003)

Authors:

D Acosta, T Affolder, MH Ahn, T Akimoto, MG Albrow, B Alcorn, C Alexander, D Allen, D Allspach, P Amaral, D Ambrose, SR Amendolia, D Amidei, J Amundson, A Anastassov, J Anderson, K Anikeev, A Annovi, J Antos, M Aoki, G Apollinari, JF Arguin, T Arisawa, A Artikov, T Asakawa, W Ashmanskas, A Attal, C Avanzini, F Azfar, P Azzi-Bacchetta, M Babik, N Bacchetta, H Bachacou, W Badgett, S Bailey, J Bakken, A Barbaro-Galtieri, A Bardi, M Bari, G Barker, VE Barnes, BA Barnett, S Baroiant, M Barone, E Barsotti, A Basti, G Bauer, D Beckner, F Bedeschi, S Behari, S Belforte, WH Bell, G Bellendir, G Bellettini, J Bellinger, D Benjamin, A Beretvas, B Berg, A Bhatti, M Binkley, D Bisello, M Bishai, RE Blair, C Blocker, K Bloom, B Blumenfeld, A Bocci, A Bodek, M Bogdan, G Bolla, A Bolshov, PSL Booth, D Bortoletto, J Boudreau, S Bourov, M Bowden, D Box, C Bromberg, W Brown, M Brozovic, E Brubaker, L Buckley-Geer, J Budagov, HS Budd, K Burkett, G Busetto, P Bussey, A Byon-Wagner, KL Byrum, S Cabrera, P Calafiura, M Campanelli, M Campbell, P Canal, A Canepa, W Carithers, D Carlsmith, R Carosi, K Carrell

Abstract:

We present a measurement of the mass difference m(Ds+) -m(D+), where both the Ds+ and D+ are reconstructed in the φπ+ decay channel. This measurement uses 11.6 pb-1 of data collected by CDF II using the new displaced-track trigger. The mass difference is found to be m(D s+)-m(D+) = 99.41±0.38(stat) ±0.21(syst) MeV/c2. copy; 2003 The American Physical Society.

The integration of liquid and solid muon absorbers into a focusing magnet of a muon cooling channel

Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference 3 (2003) 1834-1836

Authors:

MA Green, EL Black, MA Cummings, DM Kaplan, S Ishimoto, JH Cobb, W Lau, S Yang, RB Palmer

Abstract:

This report describes how one can integrate the muon absorber with the focusing coils of a SFOFO muon cooling channel [1]. The absorber material must be a low Z material that reduces the muon momentum with minimum scattering. The best materials to use for muon ionization cooling absorbers are hydrogen, helium, lithium hydride, lithium, and beryllium. Hydrogen or helium in an absorber would normally be in the liquid state, Lithium hydride, lithium, and beryllium would normally be in the solid state. This report limits the absorber materials discussed to hydrogen, helium, lithium, and beryllium. In order to achieve the same level of ionization cooling with a solid absorber as a liquid hydrogen absorber, the beta of the muon beam must be reduced more than a factor of two. This affects both the designs of the absorber and the magnet around it. Reducing the beam beta reduces the momentum acceptance of the channel. Integration of a liquid hydrogen absorber and solid absorbers with a superconducting focusing solenoid is discussed. The choice of absorber material affects the design of the superconducting focusing magnet and the superconductor that is used to generate the magnetic field.

Heavy flavor properties of jets produced in $p\bar{p}$ interactions at $sqrt{s}=$ 1.8 TeV

ArXiv hep-ex/0311051 (2003)

Measurement of the polar-angle distribution of leptons from W boson decay as a function of the W transverse momentum in proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt{s}=1.8 TeV

ArXiv hep-ex/0311050 (2003)

Deep Inelastic Scattering

Oxford University Press (OUP) (2003)

Authors:

Robin Devenish, Amanda Cooper-Sarkar