deepCool: Fast and Accurate Estimation of Cooling Rates in Irradiated Gas with Artificial Neural Networks
(2019)
A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 482:3 (2019) 3696-3717
Abstract:
© 2018 The Author(s). In the past few years, several independent collaborations have presented cosmological constraints from tomographic cosmic shear analyses. These analyses differ in many aspects: the data sets, the shear and photometric redshift estimation algorithms, the theory model assumptions, and the inference pipelines. To assess the robustness of the existing cosmic shear results, we present in this paper a unified analysis of four of the recent cosmic shear surveys: the Deep Lens Survey (DLS), the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS), the Science Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES-SV), and the 450 deg2 release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-450). By using a unified pipeline, we show how the cosmological constraints are sensitive to the various details of the pipeline. We identify several analysis choices that can shift the cosmological constraints by a significant fraction of the uncertainties. For our fiducial analysis choice, considering a Gaussian covariance, conservative scale cuts, assuming no baryonic feedback contamination, identical cosmological parameter priors and intrinsic alignment treatments, we find the constraints (mean, 16 per cent and 84 per cent confidence intervals) on the parameter S8 = σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5 to be S8 = 0.942-0.045 (DLS), 0.657-0.070+0.071 (CFHTLenS), 0.844 -0.061+0.062(DES-+0.046SV), and 0.755-0.049+0.048 (KiDS-450). From the goodness-of-fit and the Bayesian evidence ratio, we determine that amongst the four surveys, the two more recent surveys, DES-SV and KiDS-450, have acceptable goodness of fit and are consistent with each other. The combined constraints are S8 = 0.790-0.041+0.042, which is in good agreement with the first year of DES cosmic shear results and recent CMB constraints from the Planck satellite.Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science
Journal of Science Communication 18:1 (2019)
Abstract:
© 2019, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati. Effective classification of large datasets is a ubiquitous challenge across multiple knowledge domains. One solution gaining in popularity is to perform distributed data analysis via online citizen science platforms, such as the Zooniverse. The resulting growth in project numbers is increasing the need to improve understanding of the volunteer experience; as the sustainability of citizen science is dependent on our ability to design for engagement and usability. Here, we examine volunteer interaction with 63 projects, representing the most comprehensive collection of online citizen science project data gathered to date. Together, this analysis demonstrates how subtle project design changes can influence many facets of volunteer interaction, including when and how much volunteers interact, and, importantly, who participates. Our findings highlight the tension between designing for social good and broad community engagement, versus optimizing for scientific and analytical efficiency.Editorial: A Cooperative Agreement with the Journal of Open Source Software
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 869:2 (2018) 156
AGN photoionization of gas in companion galaxies as a probe of AGN radiation in time and direction
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 483:4 (2018) 4847-4865