Metal and dust evolution in ALMA REBELS galaxies: insights for future JWST observations

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 528:2 (2024) 2407-2427

Authors:

Marco Palla, Ilse De Looze, Monica Relaño, Stefan van der Giessen, Pratika Dayal, Andrea Ferrara, Raffaella Schneider, Luca Graziani, Hiddo SB Algera, Manuel Aravena, Rebecca AA Bowler, Alexander PS Hygate, Hanae Inami, Ivana van Leeuwen, Rychard Bouwens, Jacqueline Hodge, Renske Smit, Mauro Stefanon, Paul van der Werf

VINTERGATAN-GM: How do mergers affect the satellite populations of MW-like galaxies?

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 528:2 (2024) 2346-2357

Authors:

Gandhali D Joshi, Andrew Pontzen, Oscar Agertz, Martin P Rey, Justin Read, Florent Renaud

The Simons Observatory: beam characterization for the small aperture telescopes

Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing 961:1 (2024) 138

Authors:

Nadia Dachlythra, Adriaan J Duivenvoorden, Jon E Gudmundsson, Matthew Hasselfield, Gabriele Coppi, Alexandre E Adler, David Alonso, Susanna Azzoni, Grace E Chesmore, Giulio Fabbian, Ken Ganga, Remington G Gerras, Andrew H Jaffe, Bradley R Johnson, Brian Keating, Reijo Keskitalo, Theodore S Kisner, Nicoletta Krachmalnicoff, Marius Lungu, Frederick Matsuda, Sigurd Naess, Lyman Page, Roberto Puddu, Giuseppe Puglisi, Sara M Simon, Grant Teply, Tran Tsan, Edward J Wollack, Kevin Wolz, Zhilei Xu

Abstract:

We use time-domain simulations of Jupiter observations to test and develop a beam reconstruction pipeline for the Simons Observatory Small Aperture Telescopes. The method relies on a mapmaker that estimates and subtracts correlated atmospheric noise and a beam fitting code designed to compensate for the bias caused by the mapmaker. We test our reconstruction performance for four different frequency bands against various algorithmic parameters, atmospheric conditions, and input beams. We additionally show the reconstruction quality as a function of the number of available observations and investigate how different calibration strategies affect the beam uncertainty. For all of the cases considered, we find good agreement between the fitted results and the input beam model within an ∼1.5% error for a multipole range  = 30–700 and an ∼0.5% error for a multipole range  = 50–200. We conclude by using a harmonic-domain component separation algorithm to verify that the beam reconstruction errors and biases observed in our analysis do not significantly bias the Simons Observatory r-measurement

The Great Escape: Understanding the Connection Between Ly$\alpha$ Emission and LyC Escape in Simulated JWST Analogues

(2024)

Authors:

Nicholas Choustikov, Harley Katz, Aayush Saxena, Thibault Garel, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz, Taysun Kimm, Jeremy Blaizot, Joki Rosdahl

The weird and the wonderful in our Solar System: Searching for serendipity in the Legacy Survey of Space and Time

(2024)

Authors:

Brian Rogers, Chris J Lintott, Steve Croft, Megan E Schwamb, James RA Davenport