A compressed sensing faraday depth reconstruction framework for the MeerKAT MIGHTEE-POL Survey

Proceedings of the 3rd URSI Atlantic and Asia Pacific Radio Science Meeting (AT-AP-RASC 2022) IEEE (2022) 1-4

Authors:

M Carcamo, A Scaife, R Taylor, M Jarvis, M Bowles, S Sekhar, L Heino, J Stil

Abstract:

In this work we present a novel compute framework for reconstructing Faraday depth signals from noisy and incomplete spectro-polarimetric radio datasets. This framework is based on a compressed-sensing approach that addresses a number of outstanding issues in Faraday depth reconstruction in a systematic and scaleable manner. We apply this framework to early-release data from the MeerKAT MIGHTEE polarisation survey.

EAS 2022 takes positive steps forward for sustainable astronomy

Nature Astronomy Springer Nature 6:7 (2022) 765-765

Authors:

Antoaneta Antonova, Maarten Baes, Andreas Burkert, Roger L Davies, Inma Dominguez, Lex Kaper, Nick D Kylafis, Sara Lucatello, Georges Meylan, Agata Różańska

The role of redundancy in blind signal estimation for multiple gravitational wave detectors

World Scientific Publishing (2022) 71-83

Authors:

Hao Liu, James Creswell, Sebastian von Hausegger, Pavel Naselsky, Andrew D Jackson

Inferring dark matter halo properties for HI-selected galaxies

(2022)

Authors:

Tariq Yasin, Harry Desmond, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz

On cosmological bias due to the magnification of shear and position samples in modern weak lensing analyses

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 515:1 (2022) 1130-1145

Abstract:

The magnification of galaxies in modern galaxy surveys induces additional correlations in the cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering observables used in modern lensing “3x2pt” analyses, due to sample selection. In this paper, we emulate the magnification contribution to all three observables utilising the SLICS simulations suite, and test the sensitivity of the cosmological model, galaxy bias and redshift distribution calibration to un-modelled magnification in a Stage-IV-like survey using Monte-Carlo sampling. We find that magnification cannot be ignored in any single or combined observable, with magnification inducing > 1σ biases in the w0 − σ8 plane, including for cosmic shear and 3x2pt analyses. Significant cosmological biases exist in the 3x2pt and cosmic shear from magnification of the shear sample alone. We show that magnification induces significant biases in the mean of the redshift distribution where a position sample is analysed, which may potentially be used to identify contamination by magnification.