Euclid: Improving the efficiency of weak lensing shear bias calibration

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 683 (2024) a240

Authors:

H Jansen, M Tewes, T Schrabback, N Aghanim, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, M Baldi, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, S Camera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, VF Cardone, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, G Congedo, L Conversi, Y Copin, L Corcione, F Courbin, HM Courtois, A Da Silva, H Degaudenzi, J Dinis, F Dubath, X Dupac, M Farina, S Farrens, S Ferriol, M Frailis, E Franceschi, M Fumana, S Galeotta, B Gillis, C Giocoli, A Grazian, F Grupp, SVH Haugan, H Hoekstra, W Holmes, F Hormuth, A Hornstrup, P Hudelot, K Jahnke, B Joachimi, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, M Kilbinger, T Kitching, B Kubik, H Kurki-Suonio, S Ligori, PB Lilje, V Lindholm, I Lloro, E Maiorano, O Mansutti, O Marggraf, K Markovic, N Martinet, F Marulli, R Massey, E Medinaceli, S Mei, M Melchior, Y Mellier, M Meneghetti, E Merlin, G Meylan, L Miller, M Moresco, L Moscardini, E Munari, R Nakajima, S-M Niemi, C Padilla, S Paltani, F Pasian, K Pedersen, V Pettorino, S Pires, G Polenta, M Poncet, F Raison, A Renzi, J Rhodes, G Riccio, E Romelli, M Roncarelli, E Rossetti, R Saglia, D Sapone, B Sartoris, P Schneider, A Secroun, G Seidel, S Serrano, C Sirignano, G Sirri, J Skottfelt, L Stanco, P Tallada-Crespí, I Tereno, R Toledo-Moreo, F Torradeflot, I Tutusaus, EA Valentijn, L Valenziano, T Vassallo, A Veropalumbo, Y Wang, J Weller, G Zamorani, J Zoubian, C Colodro-Conde, V Scottez

syren-halofit: A fast, interpretable, high-precision formula for the $\Lambda$CDM nonlinear matter power spectrum

(2024)

Authors:

Deaglan J Bartlett, Benjamin D Wandelt, Matteo Zennaro, Pedro G Ferreira, Harry Desmond

The IA Guide: A Breakdown of Intrinsic Alignment Formalisms

The Open Journal of Astrophysics Maynooth University 7 (2024)

Authors:

Claire Lamman, Eleni Tsaprazi, Jingjing Shi, Nikolina Niko Šarčević, Susan Pyne, Elisa Legnani, Tassia Ferreira

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 962:2 (2024) 112-112

Authors:

Frank J Qu, Blake D Sherwin, Mathew S Madhavacheril, Dongwon Han, Kevin T Crowley, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Peter AR Ade, Simone Aiola, Tommy Alford, Mandana Amiri, Stefania Amodeo, Rui An, Zachary Atkins, Jason E Austermann, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, James A Beall, Rachel Bean, Benjamin Beringue, Tanay Bhandarkar, Emily Biermann, Boris Bolliet, J Richard Bond, Hongbo Cai, Erminia Calabrese, William Coulton

Abstract:

Abstract We present new measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing over 9400 deg2 of the sky. These lensing measurements are derived from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) Data Release 6 (DR6) CMB data set, which consists of five seasons of ACT CMB temperature and polarization observations. We determine the amplitude of the CMB lensing power spectrum at 2.3% precision (43σ significance) using a novel pipeline that minimizes sensitivity to foregrounds and to noise properties. To ensure that our results are robust, we analyze an extensive set of null tests, consistency tests, and systematic error estimates and employ a blinded analysis framework. Our CMB lensing power spectrum measurement provides constraints on the amplitude of cosmic structure that do not depend on Planck or galaxy survey data, thus giving independent information about large-scale structure growth and potential tensions in structure measurements. The baseline spectrum is well fit by a lensing amplitude of A lens = 1.013 ± 0.023 relative to the Planck 2018 CMB power spectra best-fit ΛCDM model and A lens = 1.005 ± 0.023 relative to the ACT DR4 + WMAP best-fit model. From our lensing power spectrum measurement, we derive constraints on the parameter combination S 8 CMBL ≡ σ 8 Ω m / 0.3 0.25 of S 8 CMBL = 0.818 ± 0.022 from ACT DR6 CMB lensing alone and S 8 CMBL = 0.813 ± 0.018 when combining ACT DR6 and Planck NPIPE CMB lensing power spectra. These results are in excellent agreement with ΛCDM model constraints from Planck or ACT DR4 + WMAP CMB power spectrum measurements. Our lensing measurements from redshifts z ∼ 0.5–5 are thus fully consistent with ΛCDM structure growth predictions based on CMB anisotropies probing primarily z ∼ 1100. We find no evidence for a suppression of the amplitude of cosmic structure at low redshifts.

GA-NIFS: JWST/NIRSpec integral field unit observations of HFLS3 reveal a dense galaxy group at z ∼6.3

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 682 (2024) A122

Authors:

Gareth C Jones, Hannah Übler, Michele Perna, Santiago Arribas, Andrew J Bunker, Stefano Carniani, Stephane Charlot, Roberto Maiolino, Bruno Rodríguez Del Pino, Chris Willott, Rebecca AA Bowler, Torsten Böker, Alex J Cameron, Jacopo Chevallard, Giovanni Cresci, Mirko Curti, Francesco D’Eugenio, Nimisha Kumari, Aayush Saxena, Jan Scholtz, Giacomo Venturi, Joris Witstok

Abstract:

Massive, starbursting galaxies in the early Universe represent some of the most extreme objects in the study of galaxy evolution. One such source is HFLS3 (z ∼ 6.34), which was originally identified as an extreme starburst galaxy with mild gravitational magnification (μ ∼ 2.2). Here, we present new observations of HFLS3 with the JWST/NIRSpec integral field unit in both low (PRISM/CLEAR; R ∼ 100) and high spectral resolution (G395H/290LP; R ∼ 2700), with high spatial resolution (∼0.1″) and sensitivity. Using a combination of the NIRSpec data and a new lensing model with accurate spectroscopic redshifts, we find that the 3″ × 3″ field is crowded, with a lensed arc (C, z = 6.3425 ± 0.0002), two galaxies to the south (S1 and S2, z = 6.3592 ± 0.0001), two galaxies to the west (W1, z = 6.3550 ± 0.0001; W2, z = 6.3628 ± 0.0001), and two low-redshift interlopers (G1, z = 3.4806 ± 0.0001; G2, z = 2.00 ± 0.01). We present spectral fits and morpho-kinematic maps for each bright emission line (e.g. [OIII]λ5007, Hα, and [NII]λ6584) from the R2700 data for all sources except G2 (whose spectral lines fall outside the observed wavelengths of the R2700 data). From a line ratio analysis, we find that the galaxies in component C are likely powered by star formation, though we cannot rule out or confirm the presence of active galactic nuclei in the other high-redshift sources. We performed gravitational lens modelling, finding evidence for a two-source composition of the lensed central object and a magnification factor (μ = 2.1 − 2.4) comparable to findings of previous work. The projected distances and velocity offsets of each galaxy suggest that they will merge within the next ∼1 Gyr. Finally, we examined the dust extinction-corrected SFRHα of each z > 6 source, finding that the total star formation (510 ± 140 M⊙ yr−1, magnification-corrected) is distributed across the six z ∼ 6.34 − 6.36 objects over a region of diameter ∼11 kpc. Altogether, this suggests that HFLS3 is not a single starburst galaxy, but instead a merging system of star-forming galaxies in the epoch of reionisation.