One year of AU Mic with HARPS - II. Stellar activity and star-planet interaction

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 512:4 (2022) 5067-5084

Authors:

Baptiste Klein, Norbert Zicher, Robert D Kavanagh, Louise D Nielsen, Suzanne Aigrain, Aline A Vidotto, Oscar Barragan Villanueva, Antoine Strugarek, Belinda Nicholson, Jean-Francois Donati, Jerome Bouvier

Abstract:

We present a spectroscopic analysis of a 1-yr intensive monitoring campaign of the 22-Myr old planet-hosting M dwarf AU Mic using the HARPS spectrograph. In a companion paper, we reported detections of the planet radial velocity (RV) signatures of the two close-in transiting planets of the system, with respective semi-amplitudes of 5.8 ± 2.5 and 8.5 ± 2.5 m s-1 for AU Mic b and AU Mic c. Here, we perform an independent measurement of the RV semi-amplitude of AU Mic c using Doppler imaging to simultaneously model the activity-induced distortions and the planet-induced shifts in the line profiles. The resulting semi-amplitude of 13.3 ± 4.1 m s-1 for AU Mic c reinforces the idea that the planet features a surprisingly large inner density, in tension with current standard models of core accretion. Our brightness maps feature significantly higher spot coverage and lower level of differential rotation than the brightness maps obtained in late 2019 with the SPIRou spectropolarimeter, suggesting that the stellar magnetic activity has evolved dramatically over a ∼1-yr time span. Additionally, we report a 3σ detection of a modulation at 8.33 ± 0.04 d of the He i D3 (5875.62 Å) emission flux, close to the 8.46-d orbital period of AU Mic b. The power of this emission (a few 1017 W) is consistent with 3D magnetohydrodynamical simulations of the interaction between stellar wind and the close-in planet if the latter hosts a magnetic field of ∼10 G. Spectropolarimetric observations of the star are needed to firmly elucidate the origin of the observed chromospheric variability.

Applications of a Gaussian Process Framework for Modelling of High-Resolution Exoplanet Spectra

(2022)

Authors:

Annabella Meech, Suzanne Aigrain, Matteo Brogi, Jayne Birkby

Applications of a Gaussian Process Framework for Modelling of High-Resolution Exoplanet Spectra

(2022)

Authors:

Annabella Meech, Suzanne Aigrain, Matteo Brogi, Jayne Birkby

One year of AU Mic with HARPS: II -- stellar activity and star-planet interaction

(2022)

Authors:

Baptiste Klein, Norbert Zicher, Robert D Kavanagh, Louise D Nielsen, Suzanne Aigrain, Aline A Vidotto, Oscar Barragán, Antoine Strugarek, Belinda Nicholson, Jean-françois Donati, Jérôme Bouvier

The EXPRES Stellar Signals Project II. State of the field in disentangling photospheric velocities

Astronomical Journal American Astronomical Society 163:4 (2022) 171

Authors:

Lily L Zhao, Debra A Fischer, Eric B Ford, Alex Wise, Michael Cretignier, Suzanne Aigrain, Oscar Barragan, Megan Bedell, Lars A Buchhave, Joao D Camacho, Heather M Cegla, Jessi Cisewski-Kehe, Andrew Collier Cameron, Zoe L de Beurs, Sally Dodson-Robinson, Xavier Dumusque, Joao P Faria, Christian Gilbertson, Charlotte Haley, Justin Harrell, David W Hogg, Parker Holzer, Ancy Anna John, Baptiste Klein, Marina Lafarga, Florian Lienhard, Vinesh Maguire-Rajpaul, Annelies Mortier, Belinda Nicholson, Michael LIII Palumbo, Victor Ramirez Delgado, Christopher J Shallue, Andrew Vanderburg, Pedro TP Viana, Jinglin Zhao, Norbert Zicher, Samuel HC Cabot, Gregory W Henry, Rachael M Roettenbacher, John M Brewer, Joe Llama, Ryan R Petersburg, Andrew E Szymkowiak

Abstract:

Measured spectral shifts due to intrinsic stellar variability (e.g., pulsations, granulation) and activity (e.g., spots, plages) are the largest source of error for extreme-precision radial-velocity (EPRV) exoplanet detection. Several methods are designed to disentangle stellar signals from true center-of-mass shifts due to planets. The Extreme-precision Spectrograph (EXPRES) Stellar Signals Project (ESSP) presents a self-consistent comparison of 22 different methods tested on the same extreme-precision spectroscopic data from EXPRES. Methods derived new activity indicators, constructed models for mapping an indicator to the needed radial-velocity (RV) correction, or separated out shape- and shift-driven RV components. Since no ground truth is known when using real data, relative method performance is assessed using the total and nightly scatter of returned RVs and agreement between the results of different methods. Nearly all submitted methods return a lower RV rms than classic linear decorrelation, but no method is yet consistently reducing the RV rms to sub-meter-per-second levels. There is a concerning lack of agreement between the RVs returned by different methods. These results suggest that continued progress in this field necessitates increased interpretability of methods, high-cadence data to capture stellar signals at all timescales, and continued tests like the ESSP using consistent data sets with more advanced metrics for method performance. Future comparisons should make use of various well-characterized data sets—such as solar data or data with known injected planetary and/or stellar signals—to better understand method performance and whether planetary signals are preserved.