Black hole mass and eddington ratio distribution functions of X-ray-selected broad-line AGNs at z ∼ 1.4 in the Subaru XMM-Newton Deep Field
Astrophysical Journal 761:2 (2012)
Authors:
K Nobuta, M Akiyama, Y Ueda, MG Watson, J Silverman, K Hiroi, K Ohta, F Iwamuro, K Yabe, N Tamura, Y Moritani, M Sumiyoshi, N Takato, M Kimura, T Maihara, G Dalton, I Lewis, D Bonfield, H Lee, E Curtis-Lake, E MacAulay, F Clarke, K Sekiguchi, C Simpson, S Croom, M Ouchi, H Hanami, T Yamada
Abstract:
In order to investigate the growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs), we construct the black hole mass function (BHMF) and Eddington ratio distribution function (ERDF) of X-ray-selected broad-line active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at z ∼ 1.4 in the Subaru XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) field. A significant part of the accretion growth of SMBHs is thought to take place in this redshift range. Black hole masses of X-ray-selected broad-line AGNs are estimated using the width of the broad Mg II line and 3000 Å monochromatic luminosity. We supplement the Mg II FWHM values with the Hα FWHM obtained from our NIR spectroscopic survey. Using the black hole masses of broad-line AGNs at redshifts between 1.18 and 1.68, the binned broad-line AGN BHMFs and ERDFs are calculated using the V maxmethod. To properly account for selection effects that impact the binned estimates, we derive the corrected broad-line AGN BHMFs and ERDFs by applying the maximum likelihood method, assuming that the ERDF is constant regardless of the black hole mass. We do not correct for the non-negligible uncertainties in virial BH mass estimates. If we compare the corrected broad-line AGN BHMF with that in the local universe, then the corrected BHMF at z = 1.4 has a higher number density above 108 M⊙but a lower number density below that mass range. The evolution may be indicative of a downsizing trend of accretion activity among the SMBH population. The evolution of broad-line AGN ERDFs from z = 1.4 to 0 indicates that the fraction of broad-line AGNs with accretion rates close to the Eddington limit is higher at higher redshifts. © 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..