Better support for collaborations preparing for large-scale projects: the case study of the LSST Science Collaborations Astro2020 APC White Paper

(2019)

Authors:

Federica B Bianco, Manda Banerji, John Bochanski, William N Brandt, Patricia Burchat, John Gizis, Zeljko Ivezić, Charles Keaton, Sugata Kaviraj, Tom Loredo, Rachel Mandelbaum, Phil Marshall, Peregrine McGehee, Chad Schafer, Megan E Schwamb, Jennifer L Sokoloski, Michael A Strauss, Rachel Street, David Trilling, Aprajita Verma

On the Observed Diversity of Star Formation Efficiencies in Giant Molecular Clouds

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 468:4 (2019) 5482-5491

Authors:

Kearn Grisdale, Oscar Agertz, Florent Renaud, Alessandro B Romeo, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz

Abstract:

Observations find a median star formation efficiency per free-fall time in Milky Way Giant Molecular Clouds (GMCs) on the order of $\epsilon_{\rm ff}\sim 1\%$ with dispersions of $\sim0.5\,{\rm dex}$. The origin of this scatter in $\epsilon_{\rm ff}$ is still debated and difficult to reproduce with analytical models. We track the formation, evolution and destruction of GMCs in a hydrodynamical simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy and by deriving cloud properties in an observationally motivated way, measure the distribution of star formation efficiencies which are in excellent agreement with observations. We find no significant link between $\epsilon_{\rm ff}$ and any measured global property of GMCs (e.g. gas mass, velocity dispersion). Instead, a wide range of efficiencies exist in the entire parameter space. From the cloud evolutionary tracks, we find that each cloud follow a \emph{unique} evolutionary path which gives rise to wide diversity in all properties. We argue that it is this diversity in cloud properties, above all else, that results in the dispersion of $\epsilon_{\rm ff}$.

Galaxy formation and evolution science in the era of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Nature Reviews Physics Springer Nature 1:7 (2019) 450-462

Authors:

Brant E Robertson, Manda Banerji, Sarah Brough, Roger L Davies, Henry C Ferguson, Ryan Hausen, Sugata Kaviraj, Jeffrey A Newman, Samuel J Schmidt, J Anthony Tyson, Risa H Wechsler

Six new supermassive black hole mass determinations from adaptive-optics assisted SINFONI observations

Astronomy and Astrophysics EDP Sciences 625 (2019) A62

Authors:

S Thater, D Krajnovic, Michele Cappellari, TA Davis, PT De Zeeuw, RM McDermid, M Sarzi

RoboPol: a four-channel optical imaging polarimeter

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 485:2 (2019) 2355-2366

Authors:

AN Ramaprakash, CV Rajarshi, HK Das, P Khodade, D Modi, G Panopoulou, S Maharana, D Blinov, E Angelakis, C Casadio, L Fuhrmann, T Hovatta, S Kiehlmann, OG King, N Kylafis, A Kougentakis, A Kus, A Mahabal, A Marecki, I Myserlis, G Paterakis, E Paleologou, I Liodakis, I Papadakis, I Papamastorakis, V Pavlidou, E Pazderski, TJ Pearson, ACS Readhead, P Reig, A Słowikowska, K Tassis, JA Zensus

Abstract:

ABSTRACT We present the design and performance of RoboPol, a four-channel optical polarimeter operating at the Skinakas Observatory in Crete, Greece. RoboPol is capable of measuring both relative linear Stokes parameters q and u (and the total intensity I) in one sky exposure. Though primarily used to measure the polarization of point sources in the R band, the instrument features additional filters (B, V, and I), enabling multiwavelength imaging polarimetry over a large field of view (13.6′ × 13.6′). We demonstrate the accuracy and stability of the instrument throughout its 5 yr of operation. Best performance is achieved within the central region of the field of view and in the R band. For such measurements the systematic uncertainty is below 0.1 per cent in fractional linear polarization, p (0.05 per cent maximum likelihood). Throughout all observing seasons the instrumental polarization varies within 0.1 per cent in p and within ∼1° in polarization angle.