EuPRAXIA Conceptual Design Report (vol 229, pg 3675, 2020)

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS 229:1 (2021) 4285-4287

Authors:

RW Assmann, MK Weikum, T Akhter, D Alesini, AS Alexandrova, MP Anania, NE Andreev, I Andriyash, M Artioli, A Aschikhin, T Audet, A Bacci, IF Barna, S Bartocci, A Bayramian, A Beaton, A Beck, M Bellaveglia, A Beluze, A Bernhard, A Biagioni, S Bielawski, FG Bisesto, A Bonatto, L Boulton, F Brandi, R Brinkmann, F Briquez, F Brottier, E Bruendermann, M Buescher, B Buonomo, MH Bussmann, G Bussolino, P Campana, S Cantarella, K Cassou, A Chance, M Chen, E Chiadroni, A Cianchi, F Cioeta, JA Clarke, JM Cole, G Costa, M-E Couprie, J Cowley, M Croia, B Cros, PA Crump, R D'Arcy, G Dattoli, A Del Dotto, N Delerue, M Del Franco, P Delinikolas, S De Nicola, JM Dias, D Di Giovenale, M Diomede, E Di Pasquale, G Di Pirro, G Di Raddo, U Dorda, AC Erlandson, K Ertel, A Esposito, F Falcoz, A Falone, R Fedele, A Ferran Pousa, M Ferrario, F Filippi, J Fils, G Fiore, R Fiorito, RA Fonseca, G Franzini, M Galimberti, A Gallo, TC Galvin, A Ghaith, A Ghigo, D Giove, A Giribono, LA Gizzi, FJ Gruener, AF Habib, C Haefner, T Heinemann, A Helm, B Hidding, BJ Holzer, SM Hooker, T Hosokai, M Huebner, M Ibison, S Incremona, A Irman, F Iungo, FJ Jafarinia, O Jakobsson, DA Jaroszynski, S Jaster-Merz, C Joshi, M Kaluza, M Kando, OS Karger, S Karsch, E Khazanov, D Khikhlukha, M Kirchen, G Kirwan, C Kitegi, A Knetsch, D Kocon, P Koester, OS Kononenko, G Korn, I Kostyukov, KO Kruchinin, L Labate, C Le Blanc, C Lechner, P Lee, W Leemans, A Lehrach, X Li, Y Li, V Libov, A Lifschitz, CA Lindstrom, V Litvinenko, W Lu, O Lundh, AR Maier, V Malka, GG Manahan, SPD Mangles, A Marcelli, B Marchetti, O Marcouille, A Marocchino, F Marteau, A Martinez de la Ossa, JL Martins, PD Mason, F Massimo, F Mathieu, G Maynard, Z Mazzotta, S Mironov, AY Molodozhentsev, S Morante, A Mosnier, A Mostacci, A-S Mueller, CD Murphy, Z Najmudin, PAP Nghiem, F Nguyen, P Niknejadi, A Nutter, J Osterhoff, D Oumbarek Espinos, J-L Paillard, DN Papadopoulos, B Patrizi, R Pattathil, L Pellegrino, A Petralia, V Petrillo, L Piersanti, MA Pocsai, K Poder, R Pompili, L Pribyl, D Pugacheva, BA Reagan, J Resta-Lopez, R Ricci, S Romeo, M Rossetti Conti, AR Rossi, R Rossmanith, U Rotundo, E Roussel, L Sabbatini, P Santangelo, G Sarri, L Schaper, P Scherkl, U Schramm, CB Schroeder, J Scifo, L Serafini, G Sharma, ZM Sheng, V Shpakov, CW Siders, LO Silva, T Silva, C Simon, C Simon-Boisson, U Sinha, E Sistrunk, A Specka, TM Spinka, A Stecchi, A Stella, F Stellato, MJV Streeter, A Sutherland, EN Svystun, D Symes, C Szwaj, GE Tauscher, D Terzani, G Toci, P Tomassini, R Torres, D Ullmann, C Vaccarezza, M Valleau, M Vannini, A Vannozzi, S Vescovi, JM Vieira, F Villa, C-G Wahlstrom, R Walczak, PA Walker, K Wang, A Welsch, CP Welsch, SM Weng, SM Wiggins, J Wolfenden, G Xia, M Yabashi, H Zhang, Y Zhao, J Zhu, A Zigler

Metastability of diamond ramp-compressed to 2TPa

Nature Nature 589:2021 (2021) 532-535

Authors:

David McGonegle, Patrick Heighway, Justin Wark

Abstract:

Carbon is the fourth-most prevalent element in the Universe and essential for all known life. In the elemental form it is found in multiple allotropes, including graphite, diamond and fullerenes, and it has long been predicted that even more structures can exist at pressures greater than those at Earth’s core1,2,3. Several phases have been predicted to exist in the multi-terapascal regime, which is important for accurate modelling of the interiors of carbon-rich exoplanets4,5. By compressing solid carbon to 2 terapascals (20 million atmospheres; more than five times the pressure at Earth’s core) using ramp-shaped laser pulses and simultaneously measuring nanosecond-duration time-resolved X-ray diffraction, we found that solid carbon retains the diamond structure far beyond its regime of predicted stability. The results confirm predictions that the strength of the tetrahedral molecular orbital bonds in diamond persists under enormous pressure, resulting in large energy barriers that hinder conversion to more-stable high-pressure allotropes1,2, just as graphite formation from metastable diamond is kinetically hindered at atmospheric pressure. This work nearly doubles the highest pressure at which X-ray diffraction has been recorded on any material.

Temperature Equilibration Due to Charge State Fluctuations in Dense Plasmas

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 00 (2021) 1-1

Authors:

Rory A Baggott, Steven J Rose, Stuart PD Mangles

Observations of pressure anisotropy effects within semi-collisional magnetized plasma bubbles.

Nature communications 12:1 (2021) 334

Authors:

Er Tubman, As Joglekar, Afa Bott, M Borghesi, B Coleman, G Cooper, Cn Danson, P Durey, Jm Foster, P Graham, G Gregori, Et Gumbrell, Mp Hill, T Hodge, S Kar, Rj Kingham, M Read, Cp Ridgers, J Skidmore, C Spindloe, Agr Thomas, P Treadwell, S Wilson, L Willingale, Nc Woolsey

Abstract:

Magnetized plasma interactions are ubiquitous in astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. Various physical effects have been shown to be important within colliding plasma flows influenced by opposing magnetic fields, however, experimental verification of the mechanisms within the interaction region has remained elusive. Here we discuss a laser-plasma experiment whereby experimental results verify that Biermann battery generated magnetic fields are advected by Nernst flows and anisotropic pressure effects dominate these flows in a reconnection region. These fields are mapped using time-resolved proton probing in multiple directions. Various experimental, modelling and analytical techniques demonstrate the importance of anisotropic pressure in semi-collisional, high-β plasmas, causing a reduction in the magnitude of the reconnecting fields when compared to resistive processes. Anisotropic pressure dynamics are crucial in collisionless plasmas, but are often neglected in collisional plasmas. We show pressure anisotropy to be essential in maintaining the interaction layer, redistributing magnetic fields even for semi-collisional, high energy density physics (HEDP) regimes.

High-resolution inelastic x-ray scattering at the high energy density scientific instrument at the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser

Review of Scientific Instruments American Institute of Physics 92:1 (2021) 013101

Authors:

L Wollenweber, Tr Preston, A Descamps, V Cerantola, A Comley, Jh Eggert, Lb Fletcher, G Geloni, Do Gericke, Sh Glenzer, S Göde, J Hastings, Os Humphries, A Jenei, O Karnbach, Z Konopkova, R Loetzsch, B Marx-Glowna, Ee McBride, D McGonegle, G Monaco, Bk Ofori-Okai, Caj Palmer, C Plückthun, R Redmer, C Strohm, I Thorpe, T Tschentscher, I Uschmann, Justin Wark, Tg White, K Appel, Gianluca Gregori, U Zastrau

Abstract:

We introduce a setup to measure high-resolution inelastic x-ray scattering at the High Energy Density scientific instrument at the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser (XFEL). The setup uses the Si (533) reflection in a channel-cut monochromator and three spherical diced analyzer crystals in near-backscattering geometry to reach a high spectral resolution. An energy resolution of 44 meV is demonstrated for the experimental setup, close to the theoretically achievable minimum resolution. The analyzer crystals and detector are mounted on a curved-rail system, allowing quick and reliable changes in scattering angle without breaking vacuum. The entire setup is designed for operation at 10 Hz, the same repetition rate as the high-power lasers available at the instrument and the fundamental repetition rate of the European XFEL. Among other measurements, it is envisioned that this setup will allow studies of the dynamics of highly transient laser generated states of matter.