The Radio Flare and Multiwavelength Afterglow of the Short GRB 231117A: Energy Injection from a Violent Shell Collision
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 994:1 (2025) 5-5
Abstract:
EP250207b is not a collapsar fast X-ray transient. Is it due to a compact object merger?
(2025)
EP250207b is not a collapsar fast X-ray transient. Is it due to a binary compact object merger?
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 545:2 (2025) staf2021
Abstract:
Fast X-ray transients (FXTs) are short-lived extragalactic X-ray sources. Recent progress through multiwavelength follow-up of Einstein Probe-discovered FXTs has shown that several are related to collapsars, which can also produce -ray bursts (GRBs). In this paper, we investigate the nature of the FXT EP250207b. The Very Large Telescope/Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer spectra of a nearby (15.9 kpc in projection) lenticular galaxy reveal no signs of recent star formation. If this galaxy is indeed the host, EP250207b lies at a redshift , implying a peak observed absolute magnitude for the optical counterpart of . At the time when supernovae (SNe) would peak, it is substantially fainter than all SN types. These results are inconsistent with a collapsar origin for EP250207b. The properties favour a binary compact object merger-driven origin. The X-ray, optical, and radio observations are compared with predictions of several types of extragalactic transients, including afterglow and kilonova models. The data can be fitted with a slightly off-axis viewing angle afterglow. However, the late-time ( d) optical/near-infrared counterpart is too bright for the afterglow and also for conventional kilonova models. This could be remedied if that late emission is due to a globular cluster or the core of a (tidally disrupted) dwarf galaxy. If confirmed, this would be the first case where the multiwavelength properties of an FXT are found to be consistent with a compact object merger origin, increasing the parallels between FXTs and GRBs. We finally discuss whether the source could originate in a higher redshift host galaxy.The Radio Flare and Multiwavelength Afterglow of the Short GRB 231117A: Energy Injection from a Violent Shell Collision
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 994:1 (2025) 5
Abstract:
We present the early radio detection and multiwavelength modeling of the short gamma-ray burst (GRB) 231117A at redshift z = 0.257. The Australia Telescope Compact Array automatically triggered a 9 hr observation of GRB 231117A at 5.5 and 9 GHz following its detection by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory just 1.3 hr post-burst. Splitting this observation into 1 hr time bins, the early radio afterglow exhibited flaring, scintillating and plateau phases. The scintillation allowed us to place the earliest upper limit (<10 hr) on the size of a GRB blast wave to date, constraining it to <1 × 1016 cm. Multiwavelength modeling of the full afterglow required a period of significant energy injection between ∼0.02 and 1 day. The energy injection was modeled as a violent collision of two shells: a reverse shock passing through the injection shell explains the early radio plateau, while an X-ray flare is consistent with a shock passing through the leading impulsive shell. Beyond 1 day, the blast wave evolves as a classic decelerating forward shock with an electron distribution index of p = 1.66 ± 0.01. Our model also indicates a jet break at ∼2 days, and a half-opening angle of θj=16.°6±1.°1 . Following the period of injection, the total energy is ζ ∼ 18 times the initial impulsive energy, with a final collimation-corrected energy of EKf ∼ 5.7 × 1049 erg. The minimum Lorentz factors this model requires are consistent with constraints from the early radio measurements of Γ > 35 to Γ > 5 between ∼0.1 and 1 day. These results demonstrate the importance of rapid and sensitive radio follow-up of GRBs for exploring their central engines and outflow behaviour.A probe of the maximum energetics of fast radio bursts through a prolific repeating source
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 545:2 (2025) staf1937