Semiempirical constraints on the HI mass function of star-forming galaxies and ΩHI at z∼ 0.37 from interferometric surveys
Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 704 (2025) a152
Abstract:
Context. The H I mass function (HIMF) is a crucial tool for understanding the evolution of the H I content in galaxies over cosmic time and, hence, to constraining both the baryon cycle in galaxy evolution and the reionization history of the Universe. Aims. We aim to derive semiempirical constraints at z ∼ 0.37 by combining literature results on the stellar mass function from optical surveys with recent findings on the M HI − M ⋆ scaling relation derived via spectral stacking analysis applied to 21 cm line interferometric data from the MIGHTEE and CHILES surveys, conducted with the MeerKAT and VLA radio telescopes, respectively. Methods. We drew synthetic stellar mass samples directly from the publicly available results underlying the analysis of the COSMOS2020 galaxy photometric sample. We then converted M ⋆ into M HI using analytical fitting functions to the data points from H I stacking. We next fit a Schechter function to the median HIMF from all the samples via Monte Carlo Markov chains. We finally derived the posterior distribution for Ω HI by integrating the models for the HIMF built from the posteriors samples of the Schechter parameters. Results. We find a deviation of the HIMF at z ∼ 0.37 from the results at z ∼ 0 from the ALFALFA survey and at z ∼ 1 from uGMRT data. Our results for Ω HI are in broad agreement with other literature results and follow the overall trend on Ω HI as a function of redshift. The derived value Ω HI = (7.02 +0.59 −0.52 ) × 10 −4 at z ∼ 0.37 from the combined analysis deviates by ∼2.9 σ from the ALFALFA result at z ∼ 0. Conclusions. Our findings regarding the HIMF and Ω HI derived from deep, state-of-the-art interferometric surveys differ from previous literature results at z ∼ 0 and z ∼ 1. We are unable to confirm at this stage whether these differences are due to cosmic evolution consistent with a smooth transition of the H I content of galaxies over the last 8 Gyr or due to selection biases and systematics.TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays
Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 704 (2025) a63
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from eight strongly lensed quasars (hereafter, the TDCOSMO-2025 sample). Building on previous work, our analysis incorporated new deflector stellar velocity dispersions measured from spectra obtained with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Keck Telescopes, and the Very Large Telescope (VLT), utilizing improved methods. We used integrated JWST stellar kinematics for five lenses, VLT-MUSE for 2, and resolved kinematics from Keck and JWST for RX J1131−1231. We also considered two samples of non-time-delay lenses: 11 from the Sloan Lens ACS (SLACS) sample with Keck-KCWI resolved kinematics; and four from the Strong Lenses in the Legacy Survey (SL2S) sample. We improved our analysis of line-of-sight effects, the surface brightness profile of the lens galaxies, and orbital anisotropy, and corrected for projection effects in the dynamics. Our uncertainties are maximally conservative by accounting for the mass-sheet degeneracy in the deflectors’ mass density profiles. The analysis was blinded to prevent experimenter bias. Our primary result is based on the TDCOSMO-2025 sample, in combination with Ω m constraints from the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae (SN) dataset. In the flat Λ cold dark matter (CDM), we find H 0 = 71.6 +3.9 −3.3 km s −1 Mpc −1 . The SLACS and SL2S samples are in excellent agreement with the TDCOSMO-2025 sample, improving the precision on H 0 in flat ΛCDM to 4.6%. Using the Dark Energy Survey SN Year-5 dataset (DES-SN5YR) or DESI-DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) likelihoods instead of Pantheon+ yields very similar results. We also present constraints in the open ΛCDM, w CDM, w 0 w a CDM, and w ϕ CDM cosmologies. The TDCOSMO H 0 inference is robust and consistent across all presented cosmological models, and our cosmological constraints in them agree with those from the BAO and SN.Normal or transitional? The evolution and properties of two type Ia supernovae in the Virgo cluster
(2025)
The impact of galaxy bias on cross-correlation tomography
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 545:2 (2025) staf2125
Abstract:
The cross-correlation of galaxies at different redshifts with other tracers of the large-scale structure can be used to reconstruct the cosmic mean of key physical quantities, and their evolution over billions of years, at high precision. However, a correct interpretation of these measurements must ensure that they are independent of the clustering properties of the galaxy sample used. In this paper, we explore different prescriptions to extract tomographic reconstruction measurements and use the flamingo hydrodynamic simulations to show that a robust estimator, independent of the small-scale galaxy bias, can be constructed. We focus on the tomographic reconstruction of the halo bias-weighted electron pressure and star formation density , which can be reconstructed from tomographic analysis of Sunyaev–Zel’dovich and cosmic infrared background maps, respectively. We show that these quantities can be reconstructed with an accuracy of 1–3 per cent over a wide range of redshifts, using different galaxy samples. We also show that these measurements can be accurately interpreted using the halo model, assuming that a sufficiently reliable model can be constructed for the halo mass function, large-scale halo bias, and for the dependence of the physical quantities being reconstructed on halo mass.On the Distance to the Black Hole X-Ray Binary Swift J1727.8–1613
The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 994:2 (2025) 243