Paving the way to simultaneous multi-wavelength astronomy

(2017)

Authors:

MJ Middleton, P Casella, P Gandhi, E Bozzo, G Anderson, N Degenaar, I Donnarumma, G Israel, C Knigge, A Lohfink, S Markoff, T Marsh, N Rea, S Tingay, K Wiersema, D Altamirano, D Bhattacharya, WN Brandt, S Carey, P Charles, M Diaz Trigo, C Done, M Kotze, S Eikenberry, R Fender, P Ferruit, F Fuerst, J Greiner, A Ingram, L Heil, P Jonker, S Komossa, B Leibundgut, T Maccarone, J Malzac, V McBride, J Miller-Jones, M Page, EM Rossi, DM Russell, T Shahbaz, GR Sivakoff, M Tanaka, DJ Thompson, M Uemura, P Uttley, G van Moorsel, M Van Doesburgh, B Warner, B Wilkes, J Wilms, P Woudt

Spectral differences between the jets in ‘radio loud’ and ‘radio quiet’ hard state black hole binaries

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 473:3 (2017) 4122-4129

Authors:

M Espinasse, Robert Fender

Abstract:

We have compiled from the available literature a large set of radio measurements of black hole binaries in the hard X-ray state for which measurements of the gigahertz frequency radio spectral index are possible. We separate the sample into `radio loud' and `radio quiet' subsets based upon their distribution in the radio -- X-ray plane, and investigate the distribution of radio spectral indices within each subset. The distribution of spectral indices of the `radio loud' subset is well described by a Gaussian distribution with mean spectral index $\alpha = +0.2$ and standard deviation $0.2$ (here spectral index is defined such that a positive spectral index means more flux at higher frequencies). The sparser sample for the `radio quiet' subset can be approximated, less well, by a Gaussian with mean $\alpha = -0.2$ and standard deviation $0.3$; alternatively the simple mean of the distribution of the radio quiet subset is $-0.3$. The two spectral index distributions are different at high statistical significance. Confirming previous work in the literature, we test to see if the differences in observed spectra could result from different distributions of jet viewing angles, but find no evidence for this. We conclude therefore that the jets in the two groups are physically different in some way, and briefly discuss possible origins and further possible diagnostics. Finally we note that extrapolating to lower frequencies the two subsets move closer together in the radio -- X-ray plane, and approximately merge into a single distribution at around 400 MHz.

Anomalous Pulsar Scattering at LOFAR Frequencies

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Cambridge University Press (CUP) 13:S337 (2017) 275-278

Authors:

Marisa Geyer, Aris Karastergiou

Correlated emission and spin-down variability in radio pulsars

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Cambridge University Press (CUP) 13:S337 (2017) 58-61

Authors:

Benjamin Shaw, Benjamin W Stappers, Paul R Brook, Aris Karastergiou, Andrew G Lyne, P Weltevrede

Evolution of the low-frequency pulse profile of PSR B2217+47

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Cambridge University Press (CUP) 13:S337 (2017) 291-294

Authors:

D Michilli, JWT Hessels, JY Donner, J-M Grießmeier, M Serylak, B Shaw, BW Stappers, JPW Verbiest, AT Deller, LN Driessen, DR Stinebring, L Bondonneau, M Geyer, M Hoeft, A Karastergiou, M Kramer, S Osłowski, M Pilia, S Sanidas, P Weltevrede