The Square Kilometre Array (SKA)

Abstract:

We present results from a deep search for radio emission, from the X-ray pulsar systems GX 1+4, GS 0834-430 & 4U 0115+63 which have variously been suggested to possess radio jets and to be good candidates for propeller ejection mechanisms. None of these sources is detected at their optical positions, to 3σ limits of a few hundred μJy. This places upper limits on their radio luminosities and thus on the internal energy and numbers of any relativistic electrons which are three to four orders of magnitude below those of radio-bright X-ray binaries such as SS 433 & Cyg X-3. Spectral and structural information on the proposed 'radio lobes' of GX 1+4 make their association with the source unlikely. The lack of detected radio emission from any X-ray pulsar system is discussed statistically, and it is found that X-ray pulsations and radio emission from X-ray binaries are strongly anti-correlated.

Abstract:

In a companion Letter, Jones et al. report the discovery of a cosmic microwave background decrement, indicative of a distant cluster with mass ∼1015 M⊙, toward the quasar pair PC 1643+4631A, B (z = 3.79, 3.83, separation 1980). To search for the cluster responsible, we have obtained R-, J-, and K-band images of the field and have also carried out optical spectroscopy of selected objects in it. No such cluster is evident in these images. Assuming that the cluster causing the decrement is similar to massive clusters already known, our magnitude limits imply that it must lie at about or beyond z = 1. This provides independent support for the X-ray-based distance argument of Jones et al. The cluster must gravitationally lens objects behind it; for a cluster z around 1-2, the Einstein ring radius for sources at z ≈ 3.8 is ∼100″. Simple modeling, producing simultaneously the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and the lensing, shows that the source positions of quasars A and B lie within 1100 of each other and may indeed be coincident. The two quasar spectra are found to be remarkably similar apart from their 1% redshift difference. Assuming that A and B are images of a single quasar, we present a possible explanation of this difference.