Monoclinic distortion, polarization rotation and piezoelectricity in the ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3
IUCrJ International Union of Crystallography 5:4 (2018) 417-427
Abstract:
The relationship between crystal structure and physical properties in the ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 (NBT) has been of interest for the last two decades. Originally, the average structure was held to be of rhombohedral (R3c) symmetry with a fixed polarization direction. This has undergone a series of revisions, however, based on high-resolution X-ray diffraction, total neutron scattering, and optical and electron microscopy. The recent experimental findings suggest that the true average symmetry is monoclinic (space group Cc), which allows for a rotatable spontaneous polarization. Neither polarization rotation nor its potentially important real role in enhanced piezoelectricity is well understood. The present work describes an in situ investigation of the average monoclinic distortion in NBT by time-resolved single-crystal X-ray diffraction under external electric fields. The study presents a high-resolution inspection of the characteristic diffraction features of the monoclinic distortion – splitting of specific Bragg reflections – and their changes under a cyclic electric field. The results favour a model in which there is direct coupling between the shear monoclinic strain and the polarization rotation. This suggests that the angle of polarization rotation under a sub-coercive electric field could be 30° or more.Dimensional crossover of correlated anion disorder in oxynitride perovskites
Chemical Communications Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) 54:41 (2018) 5245-5247
Persistence of antiferromagnetic order upon La substitution in the $4d^4$ Mott insulator Ca$_2$RuO$_4$
(2018)
Confusion over the description of the quartz structure yet again
Journal of Applied Crystallography International Union of Crystallography 51:3 (2018) 915-918
Abstract:
In a recent paper [Huang, Gog, Kim, Kasman, Said, Casa, Wieczorek, Hönnicke and Assoufid (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 140–147], a description of the structure of quartz was given that is incorrect. There is a long history of such errors in publications describing the quartz structure. This was fully and correctly discussed in 1978 [Donnay and Le Page (1978). Acta Cryst. A34, 584–594], and yet these errors still persist. In the present paper the description by Huang et al. is corrected and the seminal work of Donnay and Le Page revisited.Spin dynamics and exchange interactions in CuO measured by neutron scattering
Physical Review B American Physical Society 97:14 (2018) 144401