LSST: From science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products

Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 873:2 (2019) 111

Authors:

Z Ivezic, SM Kahn, JA Tyson, B Abel, E Acosta, R Allsman, D Alonso, Y Alsayyad, SF Anderson, J Andrew, JRP Angel, GZ Angeli, R Ansari, P Antilogus, C Araujo, R Armstrong, Kirk Arndt, P Astier, E Aubourg, N Auza, TS Axelrod, DJ Bard, JD Barr, A Barrau, JG Bartlett, AE Bauer, BJ Bauman, S Baumont, E Bechtol, K Bechtol, AC Becker, J Becla, C Beldica, S Bellavia, FB Bianco, R Biswas, G Blanc, J Blazek, RD Blandford, JS Bloom, J Bogart, TW Bond, MT Booth, AW Borgland, K Borne, JF Bosch, D Boutigny, CA Brackett, A Bradshaw, WN Brandt

Abstract:

We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). The LSST design is driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking an inventory of the solar system, exploring the transient optical sky, and mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a large, wide-field ground-based system designed to obtain repeated images covering the sky visible from Cerro Pachón in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg2 field of view, a 3.2-gigapixel camera, and six filters (ugrizy) covering the wavelength range 320–1050 nm. The project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations by 2022. About 90% of the observing time will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode that will uniformly observe a 18,000 deg2 region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the anticipated 10 yr of operations and will yield a co-added map to r ~ 27.5. These data will result in databases including about 32 trillion observations of 20 billion galaxies and a similar number of stars, and they will serve the majority of the primary science programs. The remaining 10% of the observing time will be allocated to special projects such as Very Deep and Very Fast time domain surveys, whose details are currently under discussion. We illustrate how the LSST science drivers led to these choices of system parameters, and we describe the expected data products and their characteristics.

Gas Jet Morphology and the Very Rapidly Increasing Rotation Period of Comet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák

The Astronomical Journal American Astronomical Society 157:3 (2019) 108

Authors:

David G Schleicher, Matthew M Knight, Nora L Eisner, Audrey Thirouin

Identification of low surface brightness tidal features in galaxies using convolutional neural networks

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 483:3 (2019) 2968-2982

Authors:

Mike Walmsley, Annette MN Ferguson, Robert G Mann, Chris J Lintott

Machine Learning for the Zwicky Transient Facility

PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC 131:997 (2019) ARTN 038002

Authors:

Ashish Mahabal, Umaa Rebbapragada, Richard Walters, Frank J Masci, Nadejda Blagorodnova, Jan van Roestel, Quan-Zhi Ye, Rahul Biswas, Kevin Burdge, Chan-Kao Chang, Dmitry A Duev, V Zach Golkhou, Adam A Miller, Jakob Nordin, Charlotte Ward, Scott Adams, Eric C Bellm, Doug Branton, Brian Bue, Chris Cannella, Andrew Connolly, Richard Dekany, Ulrich Feindt, Tiara Hung, Lucy Fortson, Sara Frederick, C Fremling, Suvi Gezari, Matthew Graham, Steven Groom, Mansi M Kasliwal, Shrinivas Kulkarni, Thomas Kupfer, Hsing Wen Lin, Chris Lintott, Ragnhild Lunnan, John Parejko, Thomas A Prince, Reed Riddle, Ben Rusholme, Nicholas Saunders, Nima Sedaghat, David L Shupe, Leo P Singer, Maayane T Soumagnac, Paula Szkody, Yutaro Tachibana, Kushal Tirumala, Sjoert van Velzen, Darryl Wright

Gas Jet Morphology and the Very Rapidly Increasing Rotation Period of Comet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák

The Astronomical Journal, Volume 157, Number 3

Authors:

David G. Schleicher, Matthew M. Knight, Nora L. Eisner and Audrey Thirouin

Abstract:

We present results from our 47 night imaging campaign of Comet 41P/Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák conducted from Lowell Observatory between 2017 February 16 and July 2. Coma morphology revealed gas jets, whose appearance and motion as a function of time yielded the rotation period and other properties. All narrowband CN images exhibited either one or two jets; one jet appeared as a partial face-on spiral with clockwise rotation, while the second jet evolved from a side-on corkscrew, through face-on, to corkscrew again, with only a slow evolution throughout the apparition due to progressive viewing geometry changes. A total of 78 period determinations were made over a 7 week interval, yielding a smooth and accelerating rotation period starting at 24 hr (March 21 and 22) and passing 48 hr on April 28. While this is by far the fastest rate of change ever measured for a comet nucleus, the torque required is readily within what can exist given likely properties of the nucleus. If the torque remained constant, we estimate that the nucleus could have stopped rotating and/or begun to tumble as soon as only 2 months following perihelion and will certainly reach this stage by early in the next apparition. Working backward in time, Tuttle–Giacobini–Kresák would have been rotating near its rotational breakup velocity three to four orbits earlier, suggesting that its extreme 7 mag outburst observed in 2001 might have been caused by a partial fragmentation at that time, as might the pair of 1973 8 mag outbursts if there had been an earlier spin-down and spin-up cycle.