Optimization of the Observing Cadence for the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time: a pioneering process of community-focused experimental design

(2021)

Authors:

Federica B Bianco, Željko Ivezić, R Lynne Jones, Melissa L Graham, Phil Marshall, Abhijit Saha, Michael A Strauss, Peter Yoachim, Tiago Ribeiro, Timo Anguita, Franz E Bauer, Eric C Bellm, Robert D Blum, William N Brandt, Sarah Brough, Màrcio Catelan, William I Clarkson, Andrew J Connolly, Eric Gawiser, John Gizis, Renee Hlozek, Sugata Kaviraj, Charles T Liu, Michelle Lochner, Ashish A Mahabal, Rachel Mandelbaum, Peregrine McGehee, Eric H Neilsen, Knut AG Olsen, Hiranya Peiris, Jason Rhodes, Gordon T Richards, Stephen Ridgway, Megan E Schwamb, Dan Scolnic, Ohad Shemmer, Colin T Slater, Anže Slosar, Stephen J Smartt, Jay Strader, Rachel Street, David E Trilling, Aprajita Verma, AK Vivas, Risa H Wechsler, Beth Willman

Time-lapse imagery is cheap and timely in the fight against colonial species' decline

Authorea (2021)

Authors:

Tom Hart, Fiona Jones, Caitlin Black, Chris Lintott, Casey Youngflesh, Heather Lynch, Alasdair Davies, Eamonn Maguire, Andrew Zisserman, Carlos Arteta, Peter Barham, Colin Southwell, Louise Emmerson, Mark Jessopp

Abstract:

Many of the species in decline around the world are subject to different environmental stressors across their range, so replicated large-scale monitoring programmes, are necessary to disentangle the relative impacts of these threats. At the same time as funding for long-term monitoring is being cut, studies are increasingly being criticised for lacking statistical power. For those taxa or environments where a single vantage point can observe individuals or ecological processes, time-lapse cameras can provide a cost-effective way of collecting time series data replicated at large spatial scales that would otherwise be impossible. However, networks of time-lapse cameras needed to cover the range of species or processes create a problem in that the scale of data collection easily exceeds our ability to process the raw imagery manually. Citizen science and machine learning provide solutions to scaling up data extraction (such as locating all animals in an image). Crucially, citizen science, machine learning-derived classifiers, and the intersection between them, are key to understanding how to establish monitoring systems that are sensitive to – and sufficiently powerful to detect –changes in the study system. Citizen science works relatively ‘out of the box’, and we regard it as a first step for many systems until machine learning algorithms are sufficiently trained to automate the process. Using Penguin Watch (www.penguinwatch.org) data as a case study, we discuss a complete workflow from images to parameter estimation and interpretation: the use of citizen science and computer vision for image processing, and parameter estimation and individual recognition for investigating biological questions. We discuss which techniques are easily generalizable to a range of questions, and where more work is needed to supplement ‘out of the box’ tools. We conclude with a horizon scan of the advances in camera technology, such as on-board computer vision and decision making.

The lens SW05 J143454.4+522850: a fossil group at redshift 0.6?

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 506:2 (2021) 1715-1722

Authors:

Philipp Denzel, Onur Çatmabacak, Jonathan Coles, Claude Cornen, Robert Feldmann, Ignacio Ferreras, Xanthe Gwyn Palmer, Rafael Küng, Dominik Leier, Prasenjit Saha, Aprajita Verma

A low [CII]/[NII] ratio in the center of a massive galaxy at z = 3.7: Evidence for a transition to quiescence at high redshift? (Corrigendum)

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 650 (2021) c2

Authors:

C Schreiber, K Glazebrook, C Papovich, T Díaz-Santos, A Verma, D Elbaz, GG Kacprzak, T Nanayakkara, P Oesch, M Pannella, L Spitler, C Straatman, K-V Tran, T Wang

Deep learning for automatic segmentation of the nuclear envelope in electron microscopy data, trained with volunteer segmentations

Traffic Wiley 22:7 (2021) 240-253

Authors:

Helen Spiers, Harry Songhurst, Luke Nightingale, Joost de Folter, Roger Hutchings, Christopher J Peddie, Anne Weston, Amy Strange, Steve Hindmarsh, Christopher Lintott, Lucy M Collinson, Martin L Jones

Abstract:

Advancements in volume electron microscopy mean it is now possible to generate thousands of serial images at nanometre resolution overnight, yet the gold standard approach for data analysis remains manual segmentation by an expert microscopist, resulting in a critical research bottleneck. Although some machine learning approaches exist in this domain, we remain far from realizing the aspiration of a highly accurate, yet generic, automated analysis approach, with a major obstacle being lack of sufficient high-quality ground-truth data. To address this, we developed a novel citizen science project, Etch a Cell, to enable volunteers to manually segment the nuclear envelope (NE) of HeLa cells imaged with serial blockface scanning electron microscopy. We present our approach for aggregating multiple volunteer annotations to generate a high-quality consensus segmentation and demonstrate that data produced exclusively by volunteers can be used to train a highly accurate machine learning algorithm for automatic segmentation of the NE, which we share here, in addition to our archived benchmark data.