Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Black Hole

Lensing of space time around a black hole. At Oxford we study black holes observationally and theoretically on all size and time scales - it is some of our core work.

Credit: ALAIN RIAZUELO, IAP/UPMC/CNRS. CLICK HERE TO VIEW MORE IMAGES.

Prof. David Alonso

Associate Professor of Cosmology

Sub department

  • Astrophysics

Research groups

  • Beecroft Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  • Rubin-LSST
David.Alonso@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)288582
Denys Wilkinson Building, room 532B
  • About
  • Publications

Quaia, the Gaia-unWISE Quasar Catalog: An All-sky Spectroscopic Quasar Sample

The Astrophysical Journal American Astronomical Society 964:1 (2024) ARTN 69

Authors:

Kate Storey-Fisher, David W Hogg, Hans-Walter Rix, Anna-Christina Eilers, Giulio Fabbian, Michael R Blanton, David Alonso

Abstract:

We present a new, all-sky quasar catalog, Quaia, that samples the largest comoving volume of any existing spectroscopic quasar sample. The catalog draws on the 6,649,162 quasar candidates identified by the Gaia mission that have redshift estimates from the space observatory’s low-resolution blue photometer/red photometer spectra. This initial sample is highly homogeneous and complete, but has low purity, and 18% of even the bright (G < 20.0) confirmed quasars have discrepant redshift estimates (∣Δz/(1 + z)∣ > 0.2) compared to those from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In this work, we combine the Gaia candidates with unWISE infrared data (based on the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer survey) to construct a catalog useful for cosmological and astrophysical quasar studies. We apply cuts based on proper motions and colors, reducing the number of contaminants by approximately four times. We improve the redshifts by training a k-Nearest Neighbor model on SDSS redshifts, and achieve estimates on the G < 20.0 sample with only 6% (10%) catastrophic errors with ∣Δz/(1 + z)∣ > 0.2 (0.1), a reduction of approximately three times (approximately two times) compared to the Gaia redshifts. The final catalog has 1,295,502 quasars with G < 20.5, and 755,850 candidates in an even cleaner G < 20.0 sample, with accompanying rigorous selection function models. We compare Quaia to existing quasar catalogs, showing that its large effective volume makes it a highly competitive sample for cosmological large-scale structure analyses. The catalog is publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.10403370.
More details from the publisher
More details

The Simons Observatory: impact of bandpass, polarization angle and calibration uncertainties on small-scale power spectrum analysis

(2024)

Authors:

S Giardiello, M Gerbino, L Pagano, D Alonso, B Beringue, B Bolliet, E Calabrese, G Coppi, J Errard, G Fabbian, I Harrison, JC Hill, HT Jense, B Keating, A La Posta, M Lattanzi, AI Lonappan, G Puglisi, CL Reichardt, SM Simon
More details from the publisher

Modelling cross-correlations of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and galaxies

The Open Journal of Astrophysics Maynooth University 7 (2024)

Authors:

Federico R Urban, Stefano Camera, David Alonso

Abstract:

The astrophysical engines that power ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) remain to date unknown. Since the propagation horizon of UHECRs is limited to the local, anisotropic Universe, the distribution of UHECR arrival directions should be anisotropic. In this paper we expand the analysis of the potential for the angular, harmonic cross-correlation between UHECRs and galaxies to detect such anisotropies. We do so by studying simulations performed assuming proton, oxygen and silicon injection models, each simulation containing a number of events comparable to a conservative estimate of currently available datasets, as well as by extending the analytic treatment of the magnetic deflections. Quantitatively, we find that, while the correlations for each given multipole are generally weak, (1) the total harmonic power summed over multipoles is detectable with signal-to-noise ratios well above 5 for both the auto-correlation and the cross-correlation (once optimal weights are applied) in most cases studied here, with peaks of signal-to-noise ratio around between 8 and 10 at the highest energies; (2) if we combine the UHECR auto-correlation and the cross-correlation we are able to reach detection levels of 3σ and above for individual multipoles at the largest scales, especially for heavy composition. In particular, we predict that the combined-analysis quadrupole could be detected already with existing data.
More details from the publisher

Galaxy bias in the era of LSST: perturbative bias expansions

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics IOP Publishing 2024:02 (2024) 015

Authors:

Andrina Nicola, Boryana Hadzhiyska, Nathan Findlay, Carlos García-García, David Alonso, Anže Slosar, Zhiyuan Guo, Nickolas Kokron, Raúl Angulo, Alejandro Aviles, Jonathan Blazek, Jo Dunkley, Bhuvnesh Jain, Marcos Pellejero, James Sullivan, Christopher W Walter, Matteo Zennaro

Abstract:

Upcoming imaging surveys will allow for high signal-to-noise measurements of galaxy clustering at small scales. In this work, we present the results of the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) bias challenge, the goal of which is to compare the performance of different nonlinear galaxy bias models in the context of LSST Year 10 (Y10) data. Specifically, we compare two perturbative approaches, Lagrangian perturbation theory (LPT) and Eulerian perturbation theory (EPT) to two variants of Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT), with our fiducial implementation of these models including terms up to second order in the bias expansion as well as nonlocal bias and deviations from Poissonian stochasticity. We consider a variety of different simulated galaxy samples and test the performance of the bias models in a tomographic joint analysis of LSST-Y10-like galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy-lensing and cosmic shear. We find both HEFT methods as well as LPT and EPT combined with non-perturbative predictions for the matter power spectrum to yield unbiased constraints on cosmological parameters up to at least a maximal scale of kmax = 0.4 Mpc-1 for all samples considered, even in the presence of assembly bias. While we find that we can reduce the complexity of the bias model for HEFT without compromising fit accuracy, this is not generally the case for the perturbative models. We find significant detections of non-Poissonian stochasticity in all cases considered, and our analysis shows evidence that small-scale galaxy clustering predominantly improves constraints on galaxy bias rather than cosmological parameters. These results therefore suggest that the systematic uncertainties associated with current nonlinear bias models are likely to be subdominant compared to other sources of error for tomographic analyses of upcoming photometric surveys, which bodes well for future galaxy clustering analyses using these high signal-to-noise data.

More details from the publisher
Details from ORA

Growth history and quasar bias evolution at z < 3 from Quaia

(2024)

Authors:

G Piccirilli, G Fabbian, D Alonso, K Storey-Fisher, J Carron, A Lewis, C García-García
More details from the publisher

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Current page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet