Dr Scott Osprey FRMetS

Abstract:

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The simulated climate in the American Monsoon System (AMS) in the CMIP6 submissions of HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 and the UKESM1 is assessed and compared to observations and reanalysis. Pre-industrial control and historical experiments are analysed to evaluate the model representation of this monsoon under different configurations, resolutions and with and without Earth System processes. The simulations exhibit a good representation of the temperature and precipitation seasonal cycles, although the historical experiments overestimate summer temperature in the Amazon, Mexico and Central America by more than 1.5 K. The seasonal cycle of rainfall and general characteristics of the North American Monsoon are well represented by all the simulations. The models simulate the bimodal regime of precipitation in southern Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean known as the midsummer drought, although with a stronger intraseasonal variation than observed. Austral summer biases in the modelled Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), Walker Circulation, cloud cover and regional temperature distributions are significant and influenced the simulated spatial distribution of rainfall in the South American Monsoon. These biases lead to an overestimation of precipitation in southeastern Brazil and an underestimation of precipitation in the Amazon. El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) characteristics and teleconnections to the AMS are well represented by the simulations. The precipitation responses to the positive and negative phase of ENSO in subtropical America are linear in both pre-industrial and historical experiments. Overall, the UKESM has the same performance as the lower resolution simulation of HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 and no significant difference for the AMS was found between the two model configurations. In contrast, the medium resolution HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 N216 simulation outperforms the low-resolution simulations in temperature, rainfall, ITCZ and Walker circulation biases.</p>

Abstract:

The simulated climate of the American monsoon system (AMS) in the UK models HadGEM3 GC3.1 (GC3) and the Earth system model UKESM1 is assessed and compared to observations and reanalysis. We evaluate the pre-industrial control, AMIP and historical experiments of UKESM1 and two configurations of GC3: a low (1.875∘×1.25∘) and a medium (0.83∘×0.56∘) resolution. The simulations show a good representation of the seasonal cycle of temperature in monsoon regions, although the historical experiments overestimate the observed summer temperature in the Amazon, Mexico and Central America by more than 1.5 K. The seasonal cycle of rainfall and general characteristics of the North American monsoon of all the simulations agree well with observations and reanalysis, showing a notable improvement from previous versions of the HadGEM model. The models reasonably simulate the bimodal regime of precipitation in southern Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean known as the midsummer drought, although with a stronger-than-observed difference between the two peaks of precipitation and the dry period. Austral summer biases in the modelled Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), cloud cover and regional temperature patterns are significant and influence the simulated regional rainfall in the South American monsoon. These biases lead to an overestimation of precipitation in southeastern Brazil and an underestimation of precipitation in the Amazon. The precipitation biases over the Amazon and southeastern Brazil are greatly reduced in the AMIP simulations, highlighting that the Atlantic sea surface temperatures are key for representing precipitation in the South American monsoon. El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) teleconnections, of precipitation and temperature, to the AMS are reasonably simulated by all the experiments. The precipitation responses to the positive and negative phase of ENSO in subtropical America are linear in both pre-industrial and historical experiments. Overall, the biases in UKESM1 and the low-resolution configuration of GC3 are very similar for precipitation, ITCZ and Walker circulation; i.e. the inclusion of Earth system processes appears to make no significant difference for the representation of the AMS rainfall. In contrast, the medium-resolution HadGEM3 N216 simulation outperforms the low-resolution simulations due to improved SSTs and circulation.