Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

Dr Scott Osprey FRMetS

Senior NCAS Research Scientist

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate dynamics
Scott.Osprey@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)82434,01865 (2)72923
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 111
National Centre for Atmospheric Science
SPARC QBOi
Explaining & Predicting Earth System Change
  • About
  • Publications

Defining metrics of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in global climate models

Geoscientific Model Development European Geosciences Union (2017)

Authors:

Verena Schenzinger, Scott Osprey, Lesley Gray, Neal Butchart

Abstract:

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> As the dominant mode of variability in the tropical stratosphere, the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) has been subject to extensive research. Though there is a well developed theory of this phenomenon being forced by wave-mean flow interaction, simulating the QBO adequately in global climate models (GCMs) still remains difficult. This paper presents a set of metrics to characterise the QBO using a number of different reanalysis datasets and the FU Berlin radiosonde observation dataset. The same metrics are then calculated from CMIP5 and CCMVal-2 intercomparison project simulations which included a representation of QBO like behaviour to evaluate which aspects of the QBO are well captured by the models and which ones remain a challenge for future model development.</p>
More details from the publisher

Defining metrics of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in global climate models

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT 10:6 (2017) 2157-2168

Authors:

V Schenzinger, S Osprey, L Gray, N Butchart
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on global solar photovoltaic and concentrating solar power resource

Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology American Meteorological Society 56:5 (2017) 1483-1497

Authors:

Christopher Smith, Julia Crook, Rolf Crook, Lawrence Jackson, Scott Osprey, Piers Forster

Abstract:

In recent years, the idea of geoengineering, artificially modifying the climate to reduce global temperatures, has received increasing attention due to the lack of progress in reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. Stratospheric sulfate injection (SSI) is a geoengineering method proposed to reduce planetary warming by reflecting a proportion of solar radiation back into space that would otherwise warm the surface and lower atmosphere. We analyze results from the HadGEM2-CCS climate model with stratospheric emissions of 10 Tg yr-1 of SO2, designed to offset global temperature rise by around 1°C. A reduction in concentrating solar power (CSP) output of 5.9% on average over land is shown under SSI compared to a baseline future climate change scenario (RCP4.5) due to a decrease in direct radiation. Solar photovoltaic (PV) energy is generally less affected as it can use diffuse radiation, which increases under SSI, at the expense of direct radiation. Our results from HadGEM2-CCS are compared to the GEOSCCM chemistry-climate model from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), with 5 Tg yr-1 emission of SO2. In many regions, the differences predicted in solar energy output between the SSI and RCP4.5 simulations are robust, as the sign of the changes for both the HadGEM2-CCS and GEOSCCM models agree. Furthermore, the sign of the total and direct annual mean radiation changes evaluated by HadGEM2-CCS agree with the sign of the multi-model mean changes of an ensemble of GeoMIP models over the majority of the world.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Report on the SPARC QBO Workshop: The QBO and its Global Influence - Past, Present and Future

Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (2017) 33-41

Authors:

James Anstey, Scott Osprey, Neal Butchart, Kevin Hamilton, Lesley Gray, Mark Baldwin

Abstract:

There is no known atmospheric phenomenon with a longer horizon of predictability than the quasibiennial oscillation (QBO) of tropical stratospheric circulation. With a mean period of about 28 months, the QBO phase can routinely be predicted at least a year in advance. This predictability arises from internal atmospheric dynamics, rather than from external forcings with long timescales, and it offers the tantalizing prospect of improved predictions for any phenomena influenced by the QBO. Observed QBO teleconnections include an apparent QBO influence on the stratospheric winter polar vortices in both hemispheres, the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), and the North-Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Yet the degree to which such teleconnections are real, robust, and sufficiently strong to provide useful predictive skill remains an important topic of research. Utilizing and understanding these linkages will require atmospheric models that adequately represent both the QBO and the mechanisms by which it influences other aspects of the general circulation, such as tropical deep convection.


The 2016 QBO workshop in Oxford aimed to explore these themes, and to build on the outcomes of the first QBO workshop, held in March 2015 in Victoria, BC, Canada (as reported in SPARC Newsletter No. 45). This earlier workshop was the kick-off meeting of the SPARC QBOi (QBO Initiative) activity, and its key outcome was to plan a series of coordinated Atmosphere General Circulation Model (AGCM) experiments (the “phase-one” QBOi experiments). These experiments provide a multi-model dataset that can be used to investigate the aforementioned themes. While the focus of the Victoria meeting was primarily on the QBO itself, the Oxford workshop has broadened the scope of the QBOi activity to encompass QBO impacts. Its primary outcome is a planned set of core papers analysing the phaseone QBOi experiments,

Details from ORA

The NuMI neutrino beam

NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 806 (2016) 279-306

Authors:

P Adamson, K Andersonc, M Andrewsc, R Andrewsc, I Anghel, D Augustinec, A Aurisanob, S Avvakumov, DS Ayres, B Baller, B Barish, G Barr, WL Barrett, RH Bernstein, J Biggs, M Bishai, A Blake, V Bocean, GJ Bock, DJ Boehnlein, D Bogert, K Bourkland, SV Cao, CM Castromonte, S Childress, BC Choudhary, JAB Coelho, JH Cobb, L Corwin, D Crane, JP Cravens, D Cronin-Hennessy, RJ Ducar, JK De Jong, AV Devan, NE Devenish, MV Diwan, AR Erwin, D Crane, JP Cravens, D Cronin-Hennessy, RJ Ducar, JK De Jong, AV Devan, NE Devenish, MV Diwan, AR Erwin, CO Escobar, JJ Evans, E Falk, GJ Feldman, TH Fields, R Ford, MV Frohne, HR Gallagher, V Garkushak, RA Gomes, MC Goodman, P Gouffon, N Graf, R Gran, N Grossman, K Grzelak, A Habig, SR Hahn, D Harding, D Harris, PG Harris, J Hartnell, R Hatcher, S Hays, K Heller, A Holin, J Huang, J Hylen, A Ibrahim, D Indurthy, GM Irwin, Z Isvan, DE Jaffe, C James, D Jensen, J Johnstone, T Kafka, SMS Kasahara, G Koizumi, S Kopp, M Kordosky, A Kreymer, K Lang, C Laughton, G Lefeuvre, J Ling, PJ Litchfield, L Loiacono, P Lucas, WA Mann, A Marchionni, ML Marshak, N Mayer, C McGivern, MM Medeiros, R Mehdiyey, JR Meier, MD Messier, DG Michael, RH Milburn, JL Miller, WH Miller, SR Mishra, SM Sherc, CD Moore, J Morfin, L Mualem, S Mufson, S Murgia, M Murtagh, J Musser, D Naples, JK Nelson, HB Newman, RJ Nichol, JA Nowak, J O'Connor, WP Oliver, M Olsen, M Orchanian, S Osprey, RB Pahlka, J Paley, A Para, RB Patterson, T Patzak, Z Pavlovic, G Pawloski, A Perch, EA Peterson, DA Petyt, MM Pfuetzner, S Phan-Budd, RK Plunkett, N Poonthottathil, P Prieto, D Pushka, X Qiu, A Radovic, RA Rameika, J Ratchford, B Rebel, R Reilly, C Rosenfeld, HA Rubin, K Ruddick, MC Sanchez, N Saoulidou, L Sauer, J Schneps, D Schoo, A Schreckenberger, P Schreiner, P Shanahan, R Sharma, W Smart, C Smith, A Sousa, A Stefanik, N Tagg, RL Talaga, G Tassotto, J Thomas, J Thompson, MA Thomson, X Tian, A Timmons, D Tinsley, SC Tognini, R Toner, D Torretta, I Trostin, G Tzanakos, J Urheim, P Vahle, K Vaziri, E Villegas, B Viren, G Vogel, RC Webber, A Weber, RC Webb, A Wehmann, C White, L Whitehead, LH Whitehead, SG Wojcicki, ML Wong-Squires, T Yang, FX Yumiceva, V Zarucheisky, R Zwaska
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
Details from ArXiV

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Current page 16
  • Page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet