Skip to main content
Home
Department Of Physics text logo
  • Research
    • Our research
    • Our research groups
    • Our research in action
    • Research funding support
    • Summer internships for undergraduates
  • Study
    • Undergraduates
    • Postgraduates
  • Engage
    • For alumni
    • For business
    • For schools
    • For the public
Menu
Juno Jupiter image

Dr Scott Osprey FRMetS

Senior NCAS Research Scientist

Research theme

  • Climate physics

Sub department

  • Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics

Research groups

  • Climate dynamics
Scott.Osprey@physics.ox.ac.uk
Telephone: 01865 (2)82434,01865 (2)72923
Atmospheric Physics Clarendon Laboratory, room 111
National Centre for Atmospheric Science
SPARC QBOi
Explaining & Predicting Earth System Change
  • About
  • Publications

Report on the SPARC QBO Workshop: The QBO and its Global Influence - Past, Present and Future

Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate (2017) 33-41

Authors:

James Anstey, Scott Osprey, Neal Butchart, Kevin Hamilton, Lesley Gray, Mark Baldwin

Abstract:

There is no known atmospheric phenomenon with a longer horizon of predictability than the quasibiennial oscillation (QBO) of tropical stratospheric circulation. With a mean period of about 28 months, the QBO phase can routinely be predicted at least a year in advance. This predictability arises from internal atmospheric dynamics, rather than from external forcings with long timescales, and it offers the tantalizing prospect of improved predictions for any phenomena influenced by the QBO. Observed QBO teleconnections include an apparent QBO influence on the stratospheric winter polar vortices in both hemispheres, the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), and the North-Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Yet the degree to which such teleconnections are real, robust, and sufficiently strong to provide useful predictive skill remains an important topic of research. Utilizing and understanding these linkages will require atmospheric models that adequately represent both the QBO and the mechanisms by which it influences other aspects of the general circulation, such as tropical deep convection.


The 2016 QBO workshop in Oxford aimed to explore these themes, and to build on the outcomes of the first QBO workshop, held in March 2015 in Victoria, BC, Canada (as reported in SPARC Newsletter No. 45). This earlier workshop was the kick-off meeting of the SPARC QBOi (QBO Initiative) activity, and its key outcome was to plan a series of coordinated Atmosphere General Circulation Model (AGCM) experiments (the “phase-one” QBOi experiments). These experiments provide a multi-model dataset that can be used to investigate the aforementioned themes. While the focus of the Victoria meeting was primarily on the QBO itself, the Oxford workshop has broadened the scope of the QBOi activity to encompass QBO impacts. Its primary outcome is a planned set of core papers analysing the phaseone QBOi experiments,

Details from ORA

An unexpected disruption of the atmospheric quasi-biennial oscillation

Science American Association for the Advancement of Science 353:6306 (2016) 1424-1427

Authors:

Scott Osprey, Neal Butchart, Jeff R Knight, Adam A Scaife, Kevin Hamilton, James A Anstey, Verena Schenzinger, Chunxi Zhang

Abstract:

One of the most repeatable phenomena seen in the atmosphere, the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) between prevailing eastward and westward wind-jets in the equatorial stratosphere (~16-50 km altitude), was unexpectedly disrupted in February 2016. An unprecedented westward jet formed within the eastward phase in the lower stratosphere and cannot be accounted for by the standard QBO paradigm based on vertical momentum transport. Instead the primary cause was waves transporting momentum from the Northern Hemisphere. Seasonal forecasts did not predict the disruption but analogous QBO disruptions are seen very occasionally in some climate simulations. A return to more typical QBO behavior within the next year is forecast, though the possibility of more frequent occurrences of similar disruptions is projected for a warming climate.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
More details

The NuMI neutrino beam

NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 806 (2016) 279-306

Authors:

P Adamson, K Andersonc, M Andrewsc, R Andrewsc, I Anghel, D Augustinec, A Aurisanob, S Avvakumov, DS Ayres, B Baller, B Barish, G Barr, WL Barrett, RH Bernstein, J Biggs, M Bishai, A Blake, V Bocean, GJ Bock, DJ Boehnlein, D Bogert, K Bourkland, SV Cao, CM Castromonte, S Childress, BC Choudhary, JAB Coelho, JH Cobb, L Corwin, D Crane, JP Cravens, D Cronin-Hennessy, RJ Ducar, JK De Jong, AV Devan, NE Devenish, MV Diwan, AR Erwin, D Crane, JP Cravens, D Cronin-Hennessy, RJ Ducar, JK De Jong, AV Devan, NE Devenish, MV Diwan, AR Erwin, CO Escobar, JJ Evans, E Falk, GJ Feldman, TH Fields, R Ford, MV Frohne, HR Gallagher, V Garkushak, RA Gomes, MC Goodman, P Gouffon, N Graf, R Gran, N Grossman, K Grzelak, A Habig, SR Hahn, D Harding, D Harris, PG Harris, J Hartnell, R Hatcher, S Hays, K Heller, A Holin, J Huang, J Hylen, A Ibrahim, D Indurthy, GM Irwin, Z Isvan, DE Jaffe, C James, D Jensen, J Johnstone, T Kafka, SMS Kasahara, G Koizumi, S Kopp, M Kordosky, A Kreymer, K Lang, C Laughton, G Lefeuvre, J Ling, PJ Litchfield, L Loiacono, P Lucas, WA Mann, A Marchionni, ML Marshak, N Mayer, C McGivern, MM Medeiros, R Mehdiyey, JR Meier, MD Messier, DG Michael, RH Milburn, JL Miller, WH Miller, SR Mishra, SM Sherc, CD Moore, J Morfin, L Mualem, S Mufson, S Murgia, M Murtagh, J Musser, D Naples, JK Nelson, HB Newman, RJ Nichol, JA Nowak, J O'Connor, WP Oliver, M Olsen, M Orchanian, S Osprey, RB Pahlka, J Paley, A Para, RB Patterson, T Patzak, Z Pavlovic, G Pawloski, A Perch, EA Peterson, DA Petyt, MM Pfuetzner, S Phan-Budd, RK Plunkett, N Poonthottathil, P Prieto, D Pushka, X Qiu, A Radovic, RA Rameika, J Ratchford, B Rebel, R Reilly, C Rosenfeld, HA Rubin, K Ruddick, MC Sanchez, N Saoulidou, L Sauer, J Schneps, D Schoo, A Schreckenberger, P Schreiner, P Shanahan, R Sharma, W Smart, C Smith, A Sousa, A Stefanik, N Tagg, RL Talaga, G Tassotto, J Thomas, J Thompson, MA Thomson, X Tian, A Timmons, D Tinsley, SC Tognini, R Toner, D Torretta, I Trostin, G Tzanakos, J Urheim, P Vahle, K Vaziri, E Villegas, B Viren, G Vogel, RC Webber, A Weber, RC Webb, A Wehmann, C White, L Whitehead, LH Whitehead, SG Wojcicki, ML Wong-Squires, T Yang, FX Yumiceva, V Zarucheisky, R Zwaska
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details
Details from ArXiV

Synchronisation of the equatorial QBO by the annual cycle in tropical upwelling in a warming climate

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society John Wiley and Sons Ltd 142:695 (2016) 1111-1120

Authors:

Kylash Rajendran, Irene M Moroz, Peter L Read, Scott Osprey

Abstract:

The response of the period of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) to increases in tropical upwelling are considered using a one-dimensional model. We find that the imposition of the annual cycle in tropical upwelling creates substantial variability in the period of the QBO. The annual cycle creates synchronisation regions in the wave forcing space, within which the QBO period locks onto an integer multiple of the annual forcing period. Outside of these regions, the QBO period undergoes discrete jumps as it attempts to find a stable relationship with the oscillator forcing. The resulting set of QBO periods can be either discrete or broad-banded, depending on the intrinsic period of the QBO.

We use the same model to study the evolution of the QBO period as the strength of tropical upwelling increases as would be expected in a warmer climate. The QBO period lengthens and migrates closer towards 36 and 48 month locking regions as upwelling increases. The QBO period does not vary continuously with increased upwelling, however, but instead transitions through a series of 2- and 3-cycles before becoming locked to the annual cycle. Finally, some observational evidence for the cyclical behaviour of the QBO periods in the real atmosphere is presented.

More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Interpreting the nature of Northern and Southern Annular Mode variability in CMIP5 Models

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Wiley 120:21 (2015) 11203-11214

Authors:

Verena Schenzinger, Scott Osprey

Abstract:

Characteristic timescales for the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) and Southern Annular Mode (SAM) variability are diagnosed in historical simulations submitted to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and are compared to the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ERA-Interim data. These timescales are calculated from geopotential height anomaly spectra using a recently developed method, where spectra are divided into low-frequency (Lorentzian) and high-frequency (exponential) parts to account for stochastic and chaotic behaviors, respectively. As found for reanalysis data, model spectra at high frequencies are consistent with low-order chaotic behavior, in contrast to an AR1 process at low frequencies. This places the characterization of the annular mode timescales in a more dynamical rather than purely stochastic context. The characteristic high-frequency timescales for the NAM and SAM derived from the model spectra at high frequencies are ∼5 days, independent of season, which is consistent with the timescales of ERA-Interim. In the low-frequency domain, however, models are slightly biased toward too long timescales, but within the error bars, a finding which is consistent with previous studies of CMIP3 models. For the SAM, low-frequency timescales in November, December, January, and February are overestimated in the models compared to ERA-Interim. In some models, the overestimation in the SAM austral summer timescale is partly due to interannual variability, which can inflate these timescales by up to ∼40% in the models but only accounts for about 5% in the ERA-Interim reanalysis.
More details from the publisher
Details from ORA
More details

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev
  • …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Current page 17
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Footer Menu

  • Contact us
  • Giving to the Dept of Physics
  • Work with us
  • Media

User account menu

  • Log in

Follow us

FIND US

Clarendon Laboratory,

Parks Road,

Oxford,

OX1 3PU

CONTACT US

Tel: +44(0)1865272200

University of Oxfrod logo Department Of Physics text logo
IOP Juno Champion logo Athena Swan Silver Award logo

© University of Oxford - Department of Physics

Cookies | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement

Built by: Versantus

  • Home
  • Research
  • Study
  • Engage
  • Our people
  • News & Comment
  • Events
  • Our facilities & services
  • About us
  • Current students
  • Staff intranet