Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 429:1 (2013) 661-678

Authors:

R Massey, H Hoekstra, T Kitching, J Rhodes, M Cropper, J Amiaux, D Harvey, Y Mellier, M Meneghetti, L Miller, S Paulin-Henriksson, S Pires, R Scaramella, T Schrabback

Abstract:

The first half of this paper explores the origin of systematic biases in the measurement of weak gravitational lensing. Compared to previous work, we expand the investigation of point spread function instability and fold in for the first time the effects of non-idealities in electronic imaging detectors and imperfect galaxy shape measurement algorithms. Together, these now explain the additive A(l) and multiplicative M(l) systematics typically reported in current lensing measurements. We find that overall performance is driven by a product of a telescope/camera's absolute performance, and our knowledge about its performance. The second half of this paper propagates any residual shear measurement biases through to their effect on cosmological parameter constraints. Fully exploiting the statistical power of Stage IV weak lensing surveys will require additive biasesA 1.8 × 10-12 and multiplicative biases M 4.0 × -3. These can be allocated between individual budgets in hardware, calibration data and software, using results from the first half of the paper. If instrumentation is stable and well calibrated, we find extant shear measurement software from Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) already meet requirements on galaxies detected at signal-to-noise ratio = 40. Averaging over a population of galaxies with a realistic distribution of sizes, it also meets requirements for a 2D cosmic shear analysis from space. If used on fainter galaxies or for 3D cosmic shear tomography, existing algorithms would need calibration on simulations to avoid introducing bias at a level similar to the statistical error. Requirements on hardware and calibration data are discussed in more detail in a companion paper. Our analysis is intentionally general, but is specifically being used to drive the hardware and ground segment performance budget for the design of the European Space Agency's recently selected Euclid mission. ©2012 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.

The rise of a tensor instability in Eddington-inspired gravity

(2013)

Authors:

Celia Escamilla-Rivera, Maximo Banados, Pedro G Ferreira

The rise of a tensor instability in Eddington-inspired gravity

ArXiv 1301.5264 (2013)

Authors:

Celia Escamilla-Rivera, Maximo Banados, Pedro G Ferreira

Abstract:

In this work an extension to Eddington's gravitational action is analyzed. We consider the tensor perturbations of a FLRW space-time in the Eddington regime in where the tensor mode is linearly unstable deep and the resulting modifications to Einstein regime are quite strong.

THE ABUNDANCE OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES IN THE REDSHIFT RANGE 8.5–12: NEW RESULTS FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN

The Astrophysical Journal Letters American Astronomical Society 763:1 (2013) l7

Authors:

Richard S Ellis, Ross J McLure, James S Dunlop, Brant E Robertson, Yoshiaki Ono, Matthew A Schenker, Anton Koekemoer, Rebecca AA Bowler, Masami Ouchi, Alexander B Rogers, Emma Curtis-Lake, Evan Schneider, Stephane Charlot, Daniel P Stark, Steven R Furlanetto, Michele Cirasuolo

Unproceedings of the Fourth .Astronomy Conference (.Astronomy 4), Heidelberg, Germany, July 9-11 2012

ArXiv 1301.5193 (2013)

Authors:

Robert J Simpson, Chris Lintott, Amanda Bauer, Bruce Berriman, Edward Gomez, Sarah Kendrew, Thomas Kitching, August Muench, Demitri Muna, Thomas Robitaille, Megan E Schwamb, Brooke Simmons

Abstract:

The goal of the .Astronomy conference series is to bring together astronomers, educators, developers and others interested in using the Internet as a medium for astronomy. Attendance at the event is limited to approximately 50 participants, and days are split into mornings of scheduled talks, followed by 'unconference' afternoons, where sessions are defined by participants during the course of the event. Participants in unconference sessions are discouraged from formal presentations, with discussion, workshop-style formats or informal practical tutorials encouraged. The conference also designates one day as a 'hack day', in which attendees collaborate in groups on day-long projects for presentation the following morning. These hacks are often a way of concentrating effort, learning new skills, and exploring ideas in a practical fashion. The emphasis on informal, focused interaction makes recording proceedings more difficult than for a normal meeting. While the first .Astronomy conference is preserved formally in a book, more recent iterations are not documented. We therefore, in the spirit of .Astronomy, report 'unproceedings' from .Astronomy 4, which was held in Heidelberg in July 2012.