Forecasting extreme stratospheric polar vortex events

Nature Communications Springer Nature 11:1 (2020) 4630

Authors:

LJ Gray, Mj Brown, J Knight, M Andrews, H Lu, C O'Reilly, J Anstey

Abstract:

Extreme polar vortex events known as sudden stratospheric warmings can influence surface winter weather conditions, but their timing is difficult to predict. Here, we examine factors that influence their occurrence, with a focus on their timing and vertical extent. We consider the roles of the troposphere and equatorial stratosphere separately, using a split vortex event in January 2009 as the primary case study. This event cannot be reproduced by constraining wind and temperatures in the troposphere alone, even when the equatorial lower stratosphere is in the correct phase of the quasi biennial oscillation. When the flow in the equatorial upper stratosphere is also constrained, the timing and spatial evolution of the vortex event is captured remarkably well. This highlights an influence from this region previously unrecognised by the seasonal forecast community. We suggest that better representation of the flow in this region is likely to improve predictability of extreme polar vortex events and hence their associated impacts at the surface.

The Equatorial Jet Speed on Tidally Locked Planets. I. Terrestrial Planets

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL 901:1 (2020) ARTN 78

Authors:

Mark Hammond, Shang-Min Tsai, Raymond T Pierrehumbert

The Evaluation of the North Atlantic Climate System in UKESM1 Historical Simulations for CMIP6

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems American Geophysical Union (AGU) 12:9 (2020)

Authors:

Jon Robson, Yevgeny Aksenov, Thomas J Bracegirdle, Oscar Dimdore‐Miles, Paul T Griffiths, Daniel P Grosvenor, Daniel LR Hodson, James Keeble, Claire MacIntosh, Alex Megann, Scott Osprey, Adam C Povey, David Schröder, Mingxi Yang, Alexander T Archibald, Ken S Carslaw, Lesley Gray, Colin Jones, Brian Kerridge, Diane Knappett, Till Kuhlbrodt, Maria Russo, Alistair Sellar, Richard Siddans, Bablu Sinha, Rowan Sutton, Jeremy Walton, Laura J Wilcox

The American Monsoon System in HadGEM3.0 and UKESM1 CMIP6

Weather and Climate Dynamics Copernicus GmbH (2020)

Authors:

Jorge L García-Franco, Lesley J Gray, Scott Osprey

Abstract:

<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The simulated climate in the American Monsoon System (AMS) in the CMIP6 submissions of HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 and the UKESM1 is assessed and compared to observations and reanalysis. Pre-industrial control and historical experiments are analysed to evaluate the model representation of this monsoon under different configurations, resolutions and with and without Earth System processes. The simulations exhibit a good representation of the temperature and precipitation seasonal cycles, although the historical experiments overestimate summer temperature in the Amazon, Mexico and Central America by more than 1.5 K. The seasonal cycle of rainfall and general characteristics of the North American Monsoon are well represented by all the simulations. The models simulate the bimodal regime of precipitation in southern Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean known as the midsummer drought, although with a stronger intraseasonal variation than observed. Austral summer biases in the modelled Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), Walker Circulation, cloud cover and regional temperature distributions are significant and influenced the simulated spatial distribution of rainfall in the South American Monsoon. These biases lead to an overestimation of precipitation in southeastern Brazil and an underestimation of precipitation in the Amazon. El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) characteristics and teleconnections to the AMS are well represented by the simulations. The precipitation responses to the positive and negative phase of ENSO in subtropical America are linear in both pre-industrial and historical experiments. Overall, the UKESM has the same performance as the lower resolution simulation of HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 and no significant difference for the AMS was found between the two model configurations. In contrast, the medium resolution HadGEM3.0 GC3.1 N216 simulation outperforms the low-resolution simulations in temperature, rainfall, ITCZ and Walker circulation biases.</p>

The American monsoon system in HadGEM3.0 and UKESM1

Weather and Climate Dynamics Copernicus Publications 1:2 (2020) 349-371

Authors:

Jorge L García-Franco, Lesley J Gray, Scott Osprey

Abstract:

The simulated climate of the American monsoon system (AMS) in the UK models HadGEM3 GC3.1 (GC3) and the Earth system model UKESM1 is assessed and compared to observations and reanalysis. We evaluate the pre-industrial control, AMIP and historical experiments of UKESM1 and two configurations of GC3: a low (1.875∘×1.25∘) and a medium (0.83∘×0.56∘) resolution. The simulations show a good representation of the seasonal cycle of temperature in monsoon regions, although the historical experiments overestimate the observed summer temperature in the Amazon, Mexico and Central America by more than 1.5 K. The seasonal cycle of rainfall and general characteristics of the North American monsoon of all the simulations agree well with observations and reanalysis, showing a notable improvement from previous versions of the HadGEM model. The models reasonably simulate the bimodal regime of precipitation in southern Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean known as the midsummer drought, although with a stronger-than-observed difference between the two peaks of precipitation and the dry period. Austral summer biases in the modelled Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), cloud cover and regional temperature patterns are significant and influence the simulated regional rainfall in the South American monsoon. These biases lead to an overestimation of precipitation in southeastern Brazil and an underestimation of precipitation in the Amazon. The precipitation biases over the Amazon and southeastern Brazil are greatly reduced in the AMIP simulations, highlighting that the Atlantic sea surface temperatures are key for representing precipitation in the South American monsoon. El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) teleconnections, of precipitation and temperature, to the AMS are reasonably simulated by all the experiments. The precipitation responses to the positive and negative phase of ENSO in subtropical America are linear in both pre-industrial and historical experiments. Overall, the biases in UKESM1 and the low-resolution configuration of GC3 are very similar for precipitation, ITCZ and Walker circulation; i.e. the inclusion of Earth system processes appears to make no significant difference for the representation of the AMS rainfall. In contrast, the medium-resolution HadGEM3 N216 simulation outperforms the low-resolution simulations due to improved SSTs and circulation.