Limited impact of sulfate-driven chemistry on black carbon aerosol aging in power plant plumes

AIMS Environmental Science AIMS Press 5:3 (2018) 195-215

Authors:

MZ Markovic, AE Perring, RS Gao, J Liau, A Welti, NL Wagner, IB Pollack, AM Middlebrook, TB Ryerson, MK Trainer, C Warneke, JA de Gouw, DW Fahey, Philip Stier, JP Schwarz

Abstract:

The aging of refractory black carbon (rBC) aerosol by sulfate-driven chemistry has been constrained in coal-fired power-plant plumes using the NOAA WP-3D research aircraft during the Southern Nexus (SENEX) study, which took place in the Southeastern US in June and July of 2013. A Single Particle Soot Photometer (SP2) determined the microphysical properties of rBC-containing particles including single-particle rBC mass and the presence and amount of internally-mixed non-rBC material, hereafter referred to as “coatings”. Most power-plant influenced air was associated with very slightly increased amounts of non-refractory material, likely sulfate internally mixed with the rBC, however this increase was statistically insignificant even after semi-Lagrangian exposure for up to 5 h. On average, the increase in coating thickness was 2 ± 4 nm for particles containing 3–5 fg rBC. Similarly, the number fraction of rBC-containing particles that could be identified as internally mixed was increased by plume chemistry by only 1.3 ± 1.3%. These direct measurements of microphysical aging of rBC-containing aerosol by power plant emissions constrain the enhancement of sulfate chemistry on both rBC’s column-integrated absorption optical depth, and rBC-containing aerosol’s ability to act as cloud condensation nuclei. Appling Mie and k-Köhler theories to the SP2 observations, permits the resulting effect on rBC ambient light-absorption to be capped at the 2–6% level.

The chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0

Geoscientific Model Development Discussions Copernicus Publications 11:5 (2018) 1695-1723

Authors:

Schultz, S Stadtler, S Schroeder, D Taraborrelli, B Franco, J Krefting, A Henrot, S Ferrachat, U Lohmann, D Neubauer, C Siegenthaler-Le Siegenthaler-Le Drian, S Wahl, H Kokkola, T Kuehn, S Rast, H Schmidt, Philip Stier, D Kinnison, GS Tyndall, JJ Orlando, C Wespes

Abstract:

The chemistry–climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ contains a detailed representation of tropospheric and stratospheric reactive chemistry and state-of-the-art parameterizations of aerosols using either a modal scheme (M7) or a bin scheme (SALSA). This article describes and evaluates the model version ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 with a focus on the tropospheric gas-phase chemistry. A 10-year model simulation was performed to test the stability of the model and provide data for its evaluation. The comparison to observations concentrates on the year 2008 and includes total column observations of ozone and CO from IASI and OMI, Aura MLS observations of temperature, HNO3, ClO, and O3 for the evaluation of polar stratospheric processes, an ozonesonde climatology, surface ozone observations from the TOAR database, and surface CO data from the Global Atmosphere Watch network. Global budgets of ozone, OH, NOx, aerosols, clouds, and radiation are analyzed and compared to the literature. ECHAM-HAMMOZ performs well in many aspects. However, in the base simulation, lightning NOx emissions are very low, and the impact of the heterogeneous reaction of HNO3 on dust and sea salt aerosol is too strong. Sensitivity simulations with increased lightning NOx or modified heterogeneous chemistry deteriorate the comparison with observations and yield excessively large ozone budget terms and too much OH. We hypothesize that this is an impact of potential issues with tropical convection in the ECHAM model.

How Well Can We Represent the Spectrum of Convective Clouds in a Climate Model? Comparisons between Internal Parameterization Variables and Radar Observations

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences American Meteorological Society (2018)

Authors:

L Labbouz, Z Kipling, Philip Stier

SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol-chemistry-climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0

Geoscientific Model Development Discussions Copernicus Publications 11:9 (2018) 3833-3863

Authors:

H Kokkola, T Kuhn, A Laakso, T Bergman, KEJ Lehtinen, T Mielonen, A Arola, S Stadtler, H Korhonen, S Ferrachat, U Lohmann, D Neubauer, I Tegen, C Siegenthaler-Le Drian, I Bey, Philip Stier, N Daskalaski, CL Heald, S Ramakkaniemi

Abstract:

In this paper, we present the implementation and evaluation of the aerosol microphysics module SALSA2.0 in the framework of the aerosol-chemistry-climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ. It is an alternative microphysics module to the default modal microphysics scheme M7 in ECHAM-HAMMOZ. The SALSA2.0 implementation is evaluated against the observations of aerosol optical properties, aerosol mass, and size distributions. We also compare the skill of SALSA2.0 in reproducing the observed quantities to the skill of the M7 implementation. The largest differences between SALSA2.0 and M7 are evident over regions where the aerosol size distribution is heavily modified by the microphysical processing of aerosol particles. Such regions are, for example, highly polluted regions and regions strongly affected by biomass burning. In addition, in a simulation of the 1991 Mt Pinatubo eruption in which a stratospheric sulfate plume was formed, the global burden and the effective radii of the stratospheric aerosol are very different in SALSA2.0 and M7. While SALSA2.0 was able to reproduce the observed time evolution of the global burden of sulfate and the effective radii of stratospheric aerosol, M7 strongly overestimates the removal of coarse stratospheric particles and thus underestimates the effective radius of stratospheric aerosol. As the mode widths of M7 have been optimized for the troposphere and were not designed to represent stratospheric aerosol the ability of M7 to simulate the volcano plume was improved by modifying the mode widths decreasing the standard deviations of the accumulation and coarse modes from 1.59 and 2.0, respectively, to 1.2. Overall, SALSA2.0 shows promise in improving the aerosol description of ECHAM-HAMMOZ and can be further improved by implementing methods for aerosol processes that are more suitable for the sectional method, e.g size dependent emissions for aerosol species and size resolved wet deposition.

Quantifying the Effects of Horizontal Grid Length and Parameterized Convection on the Degree of Convective Organization Using a Metric of the Potential for Convective Interaction

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences American Meteorological Society 75:2 (2018) 425-450

Authors:

BA White, AM Buchanan, CE Birch, P Stier, KJ Pearson

Abstract:

Abstract The organization of deep convection and its misrepresentation in many global models is the focus of much current interest. A new method is presented for quantifying convective organization based on the identification of convective objects and subsequent derivation of object numbers, areas, and separation distances to describe the degree of convective organization. These parameters are combined into a “convection organization potential” based on the physical principle of an interaction potential between pairs of convective objects. This technique is applied to simulated and observed fields of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) over the West African monsoon region using data from Met Office Unified Model simulations and satellite observations made by the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument. The method is evaluated by using it to quantify differences between models with different horizontal grid lengths and representations of convection. Distributions of OLR, precipitation and organization parameters, the diurnal cycle of convection, and relationships between the meteorology in different states of organization are compared. Switching from a configuration with parameterized convection to one that allows the model to resolve convective processes at the model grid scale is the leading-order factor improving some aspects of model performance, while increased model resolution is the dominant factor for others. However, no single model configuration performs best compared to observations, indicating underlying deficiencies in both model scaling and process understanding.