Quantifying the Effects of Horizontal Grid Length and Parameterized Convection on the Degree of Convective Organization Using a Metric of the Potential for Convective Interaction

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences American Meteorological Society 75:2 (2018) 425-450

Authors:

BA White, AM Buchanan, CE Birch, P Stier, KJ Pearson

Abstract:

Abstract The organization of deep convection and its misrepresentation in many global models is the focus of much current interest. A new method is presented for quantifying convective organization based on the identification of convective objects and subsequent derivation of object numbers, areas, and separation distances to describe the degree of convective organization. These parameters are combined into a “convection organization potential” based on the physical principle of an interaction potential between pairs of convective objects. This technique is applied to simulated and observed fields of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) over the West African monsoon region using data from Met Office Unified Model simulations and satellite observations made by the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument. The method is evaluated by using it to quantify differences between models with different horizontal grid lengths and representations of convection. Distributions of OLR, precipitation and organization parameters, the diurnal cycle of convection, and relationships between the meteorology in different states of organization are compared. Switching from a configuration with parameterized convection to one that allows the model to resolve convective processes at the model grid scale is the leading-order factor improving some aspects of model performance, while increased model resolution is the dominant factor for others. However, no single model configuration performs best compared to observations, indicating underlying deficiencies in both model scaling and process understanding.

Erratum: Strong constraints on aerosol-cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions.

Nature 551:7679 (2017) 256-256

Authors:

Florent F Malavelle, Jim M Haywood, Dongmin Lee, Nicolas Bellouin, Olivier Boucher, Daniel P Grosvenor, Ken S Carslaw, Sandip Dhomse, Graham W Mann, Anja Schmidt, Hugh Coe, Margaret E Hartley, Mohit Dalvi, Adrian A Hill, Ben T Johnson, Colin E Johnson, Jeff R Knight, Fiona M O'Connor, Daniel G Partridge, Philip Stier, Gunnar Myhre, Steven Platnick, Graeme L Stephens, Hanii Takahashi, Thorvaldur Thordarson

Abstract:

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature22974.

Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Copernicus Publications 17:19 (2017) 12197-12218

Authors:

M Sand, BH Samset, Y Balkanski, S Bauer, N Bellouin, TK Berntsen, H Bian, M Chin, T Diehl, R Easter, SJ Ghan, T Iversen, A Kirkevag, JF Lamarque, G Lin, X Liu, G Luo, G Myhre, T Noije, JE Penner, M Schulz, O Seland, R Skeie, Philip Stier, T Takemura, K Tsigaridis, F Yu, K Zhang, H Zhang

Abstract:

Atmospheric aerosols from anthropogenic and natural sources reach the polar regions through long-range transport and affect the local radiation balance. Such transport is, however, poorly constrained in present-day global climate models, and few multi-model evaluations of polar anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing exist. Here we compare the aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm from simulations with 16 global aerosol models from the AeroCom Phase II model intercomparison project with available observations at both poles. We show that the annual mean multi-model median is representative of the observations in Arctic, but that the intermodel spread is large. We also document the geographical distribution and seasonal cycle of the AOD for the individual aerosol species: black carbon (BC) from fossil fuel and biomass burning, sulfate, organic aerosols (OAs), dust, and sea-salt. For a subset of models that represent nitrate and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs), we document the role of these aerosols at high latitudes.

The seasonal dependence of natural and anthropogenic aerosols differs with natural aerosols peaking in winter (sea-salt) and spring (dust), whereas AOD from anthropogenic aerosols peaks in late spring and summer. The models produce a median annual mean AOD of 0.07 in the Arctic (defined here as north of 60° N). The models also predict a noteworthy aerosol transport to the Antarctic (south of 70° S) with a resulting AOD varying between 0.01 and 0.02. The models have estimated the shortwave anthropogenic radiative forcing contributions to the direct aerosol effect (DAE) associated with BC and OA from fossil fuel and biofuel (FF), sulfate, SOAs, nitrate, and biomass burning from BC and OA emissions combined. The Arctic modelled annual mean DAE is slightly negative (−0.12 W m−2), dominated by a positive BC FF DAE in spring and a negative sulfate DAE in summer. The Antarctic DAE is governed by BC FF. We perform sensitivity experiments with one of the AeroCom models (GISS modelE) to investigate how regional emissions of BC and sulfate and the lifetime of BC influence the Arctic and Antarctic AOD. A doubling of emissions in eastern Asia results in a 33 % increase in Arctic AOD of BC. A doubling of the BC lifetime results in a 39 % increase in Arctic AOD of BC. However, these radical changes still fall within the AeroCom model range.

Uncertainty from choice of microphysics scheme in convection-permitting models significantly exceeds aerosol effects

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics European Geosciences Union (EGU) (2017)

Authors:

B White, E Gryspeerdt, P Stier, H Morrison, G Thompson, Z Kipling

Uncertainty from the choice of microphysics scheme in convection-permitting models significantly exceeds aerosol effects

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Copernicus GmbH 17:19 (2017) 12145-12175

Authors:

Bethan White, Edward Gryspeerdt, Philip Stier, Hugh Morrison, Gregory Thompson, Zak Kipling

Abstract:

<jats:p>Abstract. This study investigates the hydrometeor development and response to cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) perturbations in convection-permitting model configurations. We present results from a real-data simulation of deep convection in the Congo basin, an idealised supercell case, and a warm-rain large-eddy simulation (LES). In each case we compare two frequently used double-moment bulk microphysics schemes and investigate the response to CDNC perturbations. We find that the variability among the two schemes, including the response to aerosol, differs widely between these cases. In all cases, differences in the simulated cloud morphology and precipitation are found to be significantly greater between the microphysics schemes than due to CDNC perturbations within each scheme. Further, we show that the response of the hydrometeors to CDNC perturbations differs strongly not only between microphysics schemes, but the inter-scheme variability also differs between cases of convection. Sensitivity tests show that the representation of autoconversion is the dominant factor that drives differences in rain production between the microphysics schemes in the idealised precipitating shallow cumulus case and in a subregion of the Congo basin simulations dominated by liquid-phase processes. In this region, rain mass is also shown to be relatively insensitive to the radiative effects of an overlying layer of ice-phase cloud. The conversion of cloud ice to snow is the process responsible for differences in cold cloud bias between the schemes in the Congo. In the idealised supercell case, thermodynamic impacts on the storm system using different microphysics parameterisations can equal those due to aerosol effects. These results highlight the large uncertainty in cloud and precipitation responses to aerosol in convection-permitting simulations and have important implications not only for process studies of aerosol–convection interaction, but also for global modelling studies of aerosol indirect effects. These results indicate the continuing need for tighter observational constraints of cloud processes and response to aerosol in a range of meteorological regimes. </jats:p>