Exoplanets and Stellar Physics

Abstract:

Improved greenhouse gas (GHG) emission efficiency of production has been proposed as one of the biggest potential advantages of cultured meat over conventional livestock production systems. Comparisons with beef are typically highlighted, as it is a highly emissions intensive food product. In this study, we present a more rigorous comparison of the potential climate impacts of cultured meat and cattle production than has previously been made. Warming impacts are evaluated using a simple climate model that simulates the different behaviors of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), rather than relying on carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) metrics. We compare the temperature impact of beef cattle and cultured meat production at all times to 1,000 years in the future, using four synthetic meat GHG footprints currently available in the literature and three different beef production systems studied in an earlier climate modeling paper. Cattle systems are associated with the production of all three GHGs above, including significant emissions of CH4, while cultured meat emissions are almost entirely CO2 from energy generation. Under continuous high global consumption, cultured meat results in less warming than cattle initially, but this gap narrows in the long term and in some cases cattle production causes far less warming, as CH4 emissions do not accumulate, unlike CO2. We then model a decline in meat consumption to more sustainable levels following high consumption, and show that although cattle systems generally result in greater peak warming than cultured meat, the warming effect declines and stabilizes under the new emission rates of cattle systems, while the CO2 based warming from cultured meat persists and accumulates even under reduced consumption, again overtaking cattle production in some scenarios. We conclude that cultured meat is not prima facie climatically superior to cattle; its relative impact instead depends on the availability of decarbonized energy generation and the specific production systems that are realized.

Abstract:

Laser Guide Star [LGS] wave-front sensing is a key element of the Laser Tomographic AO system and mainly drives the final performance of any ground based high resolution instrument. In that framework, HARMONI the first light spectro-imager of the ELT [1,2], will use 6 Laser focused around 90km(@Zenith) with a circular geometry in order to sense, reconstruct and correct for the turbulence volume located above the telescope. LGS wave-front sensing suffers from several well-known limitations [3] which are exacerbated by the giant size of the Extremely Large Telescopes. In that context, the presentation is threefold: (1) we will describe, quantify and analyse the various effects (bias and noise) induced by the LGS WFS in the context of ELT. Among other points, we will focus on the spurious low order signal generated by the spatially and temporally variable sodium layer. (2) we will propose a global design trade-off for the LGS WFS and Tomographic reconstruction process in the HARMONI context. We will show that, under strong technical constraints (especially concerning the detectors characteristics), a mix of opto-mechanic and numerical optimisations will allow to get rid of WFS bias induce by spot elongation without degrading the ultimate system performance (3) beyond HARMONI baseline, we will briefly present alternative strategies (from components, concepts and algorithms point of view) that could solve the LGS spot elongation issues at lower costs and better robustness.