Ice-Giants Net Flux Radiometer for Heat Flux Measurements

Copernicus Publications (2021)

Authors:

Shahid Aslam, Simon Calcutt, Nicolas Gorius, Patrick Irwin, George Nehmetallah, Gerard Quilligan, Dat Tran

Neptune's Atmospheric Structure from the Spitzer Infrared Spectrometer

(2021)

Authors:

Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Leigh Fletcher, Glenn Orton, Michael Roman, James Sinclair, Julianne Moses, Patrick Irwin

Abstract:

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> NASA’s Spitzer Infrared Spectrometer (IRS) acquired mid-infrared (5 - 37 micron) disc-averaged spectra of Neptune in May 2004, November 2004, November 2005, and May 2006. Meadows et al., (2008, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.023) discovered Neptune's complex hydrocarbons methylacetylene and diacetylene and derived their abundances using the May 2004 data. The rest of the Neptune data has yet to be published. The data have all been reduced using the same methodology as Rowe-Gurney et al., (2021, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114506) used for Uranus, so that each year can be reliably compared.</p> <p>We detect the same hydrocarbons seen in Meadows et al., (2008). This includes the strongest bands of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), acetylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>) and ethane (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>) as-well-as weaker but still clearly recognisable features of ethylene (C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>), carbon dioxide, methyl (CH<sub>3</sub>), methylacetylene (C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>4</sub>) and diacetylene (C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>).</p> <p>At Uranus, there was a considerable longitudinal variation in stratospheric emission detected in the Spitzer data for multiple epochs (Rowe-Gurney et al., 2021). A variation is not present at Neptune in 2005 or late 2004, when all the separate longitudes displayed the same brightness temperature. In May 2004 a stratospheric variation is present, although it is tentative due to the deviation only appearing at a single longitude and because there are larger uncertainties on this early dataset. If the variation is real then it could be caused by stratospheric methane injection associated with convective clouds or perturbations to the location of the south polar warm vortex (Orton et al., 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.06.013).</p> <p><strong>Optimal Estimation Retrievals: </strong>The data from 2005 have optimised exposure times, multiple observed longitudes, and therefore the lowest noise. It is this data we are using to derive the vertical structure of the temperature and composition in the stratosphere and upper troposphere (between around 1 nanobar and 2 bars of pressure). We present full optimal estimation inversions (using the NEMESIS retrieval algorithm, Irwin et al., 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.11.006) of the globally averaged November 2005 data with the aim of constraining the temperature profile and the abundances of the stratospheric hydrocarbons. We fit both the low-resolution (R~120) and high-resolution (R~600) module data, testing multiple temperature priors derived from chemical models (Moses et al., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.02.004) and observations from AKARI (Fletcher et al., 2010, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913358). Initial findings show that we are sensitive to stratospheric D/H ratio (derived from the relative abundances of CH<sub>4</sub> and CH<sub>3</sub>D) and therefore we will attempt to constrain this value by finding the best fit for our model.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Full spectrum mid-infrared data from Neptune in 2005 taken by the Spitzer Infrared Spectrometer is to be analysed using optimal estimation retrievals for the first time. The globally-averaged stratospheric temperature structure and the abundances of stratospheric hydrocarbons will be determined along with the ratio of D/H. The disc-averaged thermal and chemical structure from Spitzer will likely be our best characterisation of Neptune’s thermal structure until JWST/MIRI acquired spatially-resolved mid-infrared spectroscopy in 2022.</p>

Temporal variations in vertical haze distribution of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot and its surroundings from HST/WFC3 imaging & dynamical interactions with incoming vortices in 2021

(2021)

Authors:

Asier Anguiano-Arteaga, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega, José Francisco Sanz-Requena, Patrick Irwin

Zonal Profiles of Jupiter's Tropospheric Abundances from Near-Infrared Juno JIRAM Spectroscopy

(2021)

Authors:

Henrik Melin, Leigh Fletcher, Patrick Irwin, Davide Grassi

Abstract:

<p>The polar orbit of the Juno spacecraft provides an unprecedented view of Jupiter's atmosphere as it passes above the cloud tops every 53 days. The spectrum in the near infrared is dominated by reflected sunlight from aerosols (both condensate clouds and hazes) in the troposphere, as well as absorptions by the molecular species present. In addition, thermal emission longward of 4.5 µm provides access to the gaseous composition and aerosols below the top-most clouds.  Of particular importance in shaping the spectra are ammonia, phosphine and water, in addition to minor contributions from species such as arsine, germane and carbon monoxide. These regions also include emissions by ionospheric H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup>. Here, we produce meridionally averaged zonal profiles from the Juno-JIRAM observations obtained during PJ3, which provide almost complete latitude coverage. To analyse the observations, we use the radiative transfer and retrieval code NEMESIS (Irwin et al., 2008), which has been updated to cover this wavelength with the latest line-data from HITRAN. Our aim is to analyse both the reflected-sunlight region (2-4 µm) and the thermal emission region (4-5 µm) simultaneously for the first time, building on the work of Grassi et al. (2019) and Grassi et al. (2020).  We investigate the appropriate set of aerosol and haze layers, starting with NH4SH at 1.3 bars, NH3 and 0.7 bars and two grey hazes: one in the troposphere and one in the stratosphere.  The optical properties of these aerosols are tested to find the optimal cloud structure to reproduce the full JIRAM spectrum. From the retrievals of the zonally-averaged spectra we investigate whether spatial variations of tropospheric composition are truly required to fit the data, comparing gaseous contrasts to the expected circulation patterns associated with Jupiter’s belts and zones.</p>

A stringent upper limit of 20 pptv for methane on Mars and constraints on its dispersion outside Gale crater

Astronomy and Astrophysics EDP Sciences 650 (2021) A140

Authors:

F Montmessin, Oi Korablev, A Trokhimovskiy, F Lefevre, Aa Fedorova, L Baggio, A Irbah, G Lacombe, Kevin S Olsen, As Braude, Da Belyaev, J Alday, F Forget, F Daerden, J Pla-Garcia, S Rafkin, CF Wilson, A Patrakeev, A Shakun, Jl Bertaux

Abstract:

Context. Reports on the detection of methane in the Martian atmosphere have motivated numerous studies aiming to confirm or explain its presence on a planet where it might imply a biogenic or more likely a geophysical origin.
Aims. Our intent is to complement and improve on the previously reported detection attempts by the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) on board the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO). This latter study reported the results of a campaign that was a few months in length, and was significantly hindered by a dusty period that impaired detection performances.
Methods. We unveil 640 solar occultation measurements gathering 1.44 Martian years worth of data produced by the ACS.
Results. No methane was detected. Probing the clear northern summer season allowed us to reach 1σ upper limits of around 10 pptv (20 pptv at 2σ), with an annual mean of the smallest upper limits of 20 pptv. Upper limits are controlled by the amount of dust in the atmosphere, which impairs detection performance around the equator and during the southern spring and summer seasons. Observations performed near Gale crater yielded 1σ upper limits of up to four times less than the background values measured by the Curiosity rover during the corresponding seasons.
Conclusions. Reconciliation of the absence of methane in the TGO spectra with the positive detections by Curiosity is even more difficult in light of this annual survey performed by ACS. Stronger constraints are placed on the physical and chemical mechanism capable of explaining why the mean of the best overall upper limits of ACS is ten times below the smallest methane abundances measured by Curiosity.