Bolometric bond albedo and thermal inertia maps of Mimas

Icarus Elsevier 348 (2020) 113745

Authors:

Cja Howett, Jr Spencer, Ta Nordheim

Abstract:

In 2011 a thermally anomalous region was discovered on Mimas, Saturn's innermost major icy satellite (Howett et al., 2011). The anomalous region is a lens-like shape located at low latitudes on Mimas' leading hemisphere. It manifests as a region with warmer nighttime temperatures, and cooler daytime ones than its surroundings. The thermally anomalous region is spatially correlated with a darkening in Mimas' IR/UV surface color (Schenk et al., 2011) and the region preferentially bombarded by high-energy electrons (Paranicas et al., 2012, Paranicas et al., 2014; Nordheim et al., 2017). We use data from Cassini's Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) to map Mimas' surface temperatures and its thermophysical properties. This provides a dramatic improvement on the work in Howett et al. (2011), where the values were determined at only two regions on Mimas (one inside, and another outside of the anomalous region). We use all spatially-resolved scans made by CIRS' focal plane 3 (FP3, 600 to 1100 cm−1) of Mimas' surface, which are largely daytime observations but do include one nighttime one. The resulting temperature maps confirm the presence and location of Mimas' previously discovered thermally anomalous region. No other thermally anomalous regions were discovered, although we note that the surface coverage is incomplete on Mimas' leading and anti-Saturn hemisphere. The thermal inertia map confirms that the anomalous region has a notably higher thermal inertia than its surroundings: 98 ± 42 J m−2 K−1 s-1/2 inside of the anomaly, compared to 34 ± 32 J m−2 K−1 s-1/2 outside. The albedo inside and outside of the anomalous region agrees within their uncertainty: 0.45 ± 0.08 inside compared to 0.41 ± 0.07 outside the anomaly. Interestingly the albedo appears brighter inside the anomaly region, which may not be surprising given this region does appear brighter at some UV wavelengths (0.338 μm, see Schenk et al., 2011). However, this result should be treated with caution because, as previously stated, statistically the albedo of these two regions is the same when their uncertainties are considered. These thermal inertia and albedo values determined here are consistent with those found by Howett et al. (2011), who determined the thermal inertia inside the anomaly to be 66 ± 23 J m−2 K−1 s-1/2 and <16 J m−2 K−1 s-1/2 outside, with albedos that varied from 0.49 to 0.70.

The atmosphere of Mars as observed by InSight

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 13:3 (2020) 190-198

Authors:

Don Banfield, Aymeric Spiga, Claire Newman, François Forget, Mark Lemmon, Ralph Lorenz, Naomi Murdoch, Daniel Viudez-Moreiras, Jorge Pla-Garcia, Raphaël F Garcia, Philippe Lognonné, Özgür Karatekin, Clément Perrin, Léo Martire, Nicholas Teanby, Bart Van Hove, Justin N Maki, Balthasar Kenda, Nils T Mueller, Sébastien Rodriguez, Taichi Kawamura, John B McClean, Alexander E Stott, Constantinos Charalambous, Ehouarn Millour, Catherine L Johnson, Anna Mittelholz, Anni Määttänen, Stephen R Lewis, John Clinton, Simon C Stähler, Savas Ceylan, Domenico Giardini, Tristram Warren, William T Pike, Ingrid Daubar, Matthew Golombek, Lucie Rolland, Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig, David Mimoun, Éric Beucler, Alice Jacob, Antoine Lucas, Mariah Baker, Véronique Ansan, Kenneth Hurst, Luis Mora-Sotomayor, Sara Navarro, Josefina Torres, Alain Lepinette, Antonio Molina, Mercedes Marin-Jimenez, Javier Gomez-Elvira, Veronica Peinado, Jose-Antonio Rodriguez-Manfredi, Brian T Carcich, Stephen Sackett, Christopher T Russell, Tilman Spohn, Suzanne E Smrekar, W Bruce Banerdt

The seismicity of Mars

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 13:3 (2020) 205-212

Authors:

D Giardini, P Lognonné, WB Banerdt, WT Pike, U Christensen, S Ceylan, JF Clinton, M van Driel, SC Stähler, M Böse, RF Garcia, A Khan, M Panning, C Perrin, D Banfield, E Beucler, C Charalambous, F Euchner, A Horleston, A Jacob, T Kawamura, S Kedar, G Mainsant, J-R Scholz, SE Smrekar, A Spiga, C Agard, D Antonangeli, S Barkaoui, E Barrett, P Combes, V Conejero, I Daubar, M Drilleau, C Ferrier, T Gabsi, T Gudkova, K Hurst, F Karakostas, S King, M Knapmeyer, B Knapmeyer-Endrun, R Llorca-Cejudo, A Lucas, L Luno, L Margerin, JB McClean, D Mimoun, N Murdoch, F Nimmo, M Nonon, C Pardo, A Rivoldini, JA Rodriguez Manfredi, H Samuel, M Schimmel, AE Stott, E Stutzmann, N Teanby, T Warren, RC Weber, M Wieczorek, C Yana

Understanding and mitigating biases when studying inhomogeneous emission spectra with JWST

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Royal Astronomical Society (2020)

Authors:

Jake Taylor, Vivien Parmentier, Patrick Irwin, Suzanne Aigrain, Graham Lee, Joshua Krissansen-Totton

Abstract:

Exoplanet emission spectra are often modelled assuming that the hemisphere observed is well represented by a horizontally homogenised atmosphere. However this approximation will likely fail for planets with a large temperature contrast in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) era, potentially leading to erroneous interpretations of spectra. We first develop an analytic formulation to quantify the signal-to-noise ratio and wavelength coverage necessary to disentangle temperature inhomogeneities from a hemispherically averaged spectrum. We find that for a given signal-to-noise ratio, observations at shorter wavelengths are better at detecting the presence of inhomogeneities. We then determine why the presence of an inhomogeneous thermal structure can lead to spurious molecular detections when assuming a fully homogenised planet in the retrieval process. Finally, we quantify more precisely the potential biases by modelling a suite of hot Jupiter spectra, varying the spatial contributions of a hot and a cold region, as would be observed by the different instruments of JWST/NIRSpec. We then retrieve the abundances and temperature profiles from the synthetic observations. We find that in most cases, assuming a homogeneous thermal structure when retrieving the atmospheric chemistry leads to biased results, and spurious molecular detection. Explicitly modelling the data using two profiles avoids these biases, and is statistically supported provided the wavelength coverage is wide enough, and crucially also spanning shorter wavelengths. For the high contrast used here, a single profile with a dilution factor performs as well as the two-profile case, with only one additional parameter compared to the 1-D approach.

Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data

Nature Geoscience Springer Nature 13:3 (2020) 213-220

Authors:

P Lognonné, WB Banerdt, WT Pike, Tarje Nissen-Meyer, Simon Calcutt, Tristram Warren

Abstract:

Mars’s seismic activity and noise have been monitored since January 2019 by the seismometer of the InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander. At night, Mars is extremely quiet; seismic noise is about 500 times lower than Earth’s microseismic noise at periods between 4 s and 30 s. The recorded seismic noise increases during the day due to ground deformations induced by convective atmospheric vortices and ground-transferred wind-generated lander noise. Here we constrain properties of the crust beneath InSight, using signals from atmospheric vortices and from the hammering of InSight’s Heat Flow and Physical Properties (HP3) instrument, as well as the three largest Marsquakes detected as of September 2019. From receiver function analysis, we infer that the uppermost 8–11 km of the crust is highly altered and/or fractured. We measure the crustal diffusivity and intrinsic attenuation using multiscattering analysis and find that seismic attenuation is about three times larger than on the Moon, which suggests that the crust contains small amounts of volatiles.