Evolution of a dark vortex on Neptune with transient secondary features
Icarus Elsevier 387 (2022) 115123
Abstract:
Dark spots on Neptune observed by Voyager and the Hubble Space Telescope are thought to be anticyclones with lifetimes of a few years, in contrast with very long-lived anticyclones in Jupiter and Saturn. The full life cycle of any Neptune dark spot has not been captured due to limited temporal coverage, but our Hubble observations of a recent feature, NDS-2018, provide the most complete long-term observational history of any dark vortex on Neptune. Past observations suggest some dark spots meet their demise by fading and dissipating without migrating meridionally. On the other hand, simulations predict a second pathway with equatorward migration and disruption. Our HST observations suggest NDS-2018 is following the second pathway. Some of the HST observations reveal transient dark features with widths of about 4000 to 9000 km, at latitudes between NDS-2018 and the equator. The secondary dark features appeared before changes in the meridional migration of NDS-2018 were seen. These features have somewhat smaller size and much smaller contrast compared to the main dark spot. Discrete secondary dark features of this scale have never been seen near previous dark spots, but global-scale dark bands are associated with several previous dark spots in addition to NDS-2018. The absolute photometric contrast of NDS-2018 (as large as 19%) is greater than previous dark spots, including the Great Dark Spot seen by Voyager. New simulations suggest that vortex internal circulation is weak relative to the background vorticity, presenting a clearly different case from stronger anticyclones observed on Jupiter and Saturn.Uranus and Neptune’s stratospheric water abundance and vertical profile from Herschel-HIFI
Planetary Science Journal IOP Publishing 3:4 (2022) 96
Abstract:
Here we present new constraints on Uranus’s and Neptune’s externally sourced stratospheric water abundance using disk-averaged observations of the 557 GHz emission line from Herschel’s Heterodyne Instrument for the Far-Infrared. Derived stratospheric column water abundances are × 1014 cm−2 for Uranus and ×1014 cm−2 for Neptune, consistent with previous determinations using ISO-SWS and Herschel-PACS. For Uranus, excellent observational fits are obtained by scaling photochemical model profiles or with step-type profiles with water vapor limited to ≤0.6 mbar. However, Uranus’s cold stratospheric temperatures imply a ∼0.03 mbar condensation level, which further limits water vapor to pressures ≤0.03 mbar. Neptune’s warmer stratosphere has a deeper ∼1 mbar condensation level, so emission-line pressure broadening can be used to further constrain the water profile. For Neptune, excellent fits are obtained using step-type profiles with cutoffs of ∼0.3–0.6 mbar or by scaling a photochemical model profile. Step-type profiles with cutoffs ≥1.0 mbar or ≤0.1 mbar can be rejected with 4σ significance. Rescaling photochemical model profiles from Moses & Poppe to match our observed column abundances implies similar external water fluxes for both planets: × 104 cm−2 s−1 for Uranus and ×104 cm−2 s−1 for Neptune. This suggests that Neptune’s ∼4 times greater observed water column abundance is primarily caused by its warmer stratosphere preventing loss by condensation, rather than by a significantly more intense external source. To reconcile these water fluxes with other stratospheric oxygen species (CO and CO2) requires either a significant CO component in interplanetary dust particles (Uranus) or contributions from cometary impacts (Uranus, Neptune)Subseasonal Variation in Neptune’s Mid-infrared Emission
The Planetary Science Journal American Astronomical Society 3:4 (2022) 78-78
Abstract:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>We present an analysis of all currently available ground-based imaging of Neptune in the mid-infrared. Dating between 2003 and 2020, the images reveal changes in Neptune’s mid-infrared (∼8–25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) emission over time in the years surrounding Neptune’s 2005 southern summer solstice. Images sensitive to stratospheric ethane (∼12 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), methane (∼8 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m), and CH<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>D (∼9 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) display significant subseasonal temporal variation on regional and global scales. Comparison with H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> S(1) hydrogen quadrupole (∼17.035 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) spectra suggests that these changes are primarily related to stratospheric temperature changes. The stratosphere appears to have cooled between 2003 and 2009 across multiple filtered wavelengths, followed by a dramatic warming of the south pole between 2018 and 2020. Conversely, upper-tropospheric temperatures—inferred from ∼17 to 25 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m imaging—appear invariant during this period, except for the south pole, which appeared warmest between 2003 and 2006. We discuss the observed variability in the context of seasonal forcing, tropospheric meteorology, and the solar cycle. Collectively, these data provide the strongest evidence to date that processes produce subseasonal variation on both global and regional scales in Neptune’s stratosphere.</jats:p>Mid-Infrared Observations of Neptune and Uranus: Recent Discoveries and Future Opportunities
Copernicus Publications (2022)
Temporal variations in spectral reflectivity and vertical cloud structure of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot and its surroundings
Copernicus Publications (2022)