Climate dynamics

Abstract:

A significant share of anthropogenic global warming comes from livestock production. There is debate about whether there can be any role for livestock in a climatically sustainable future; the debate is particularly heated for cows and sheep, largely due to the methane they burp out. However, short-lived gases like methane affect climate in a fundamentally different way than long-lived gases like carbon dioxide. Consequently, climate stabilization does not require zeroing-out cattle herds. But this doesn't mean we can eat our beef and have it (a tolerable climate) too-livestock still contribute to global warming. Preventing or limiting future growth in livestock-related emissions can represent a sensible part of the portfolio of responses to the climate crisis, particularly when carbon dioxide emissions are not on track to reach net zero sufficiently quickly.

Abstract:

In a warming climate, storm tracks are projected to intensify on their poleward side. Here we use large ensemble CO₂ ramp-up and -down simulations to show that these changes are not reversed when CO₂ concentrations are reduced. If CO₂ is removed from the atmosphere following CO₂ increase, the North Atlantic storm track keeps strengthening until the middle of the CO₂ removal, while the recovery of the North Pacific storm track during ramp-down is stronger than its shift during ramp-up. In contrast, the Southern Hemisphere storm track weakens during ramp-down at a rate much faster than its strengthening in the warming period. Compared to the present climate, the Northern Hemisphere storm track becomes stronger and the Southern Hemisphere storm track becomes weaker at the end of CO₂ removal. These hemispherically-asymmetric storm track responses are attributable to the weakened Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and the delayed cooling of the Southern Ocean.