Crustal Controls on Seafloor Weathering and Climate Regulation
(2025)
Abstract:
MACDA2: A new reanalysis for the Martian atmosphere with vertically resolved dust
Copernicus Publications (2025)
Abstract:
Recent studies of the climate and weather on Mars have benefitted greatly from the development of publicly available “reanalysis” datasets. These are quantitative reconstructions of the three-dimensional, multivariate, time-varying state of the Martian atmosphere, obtained by combining observations of atmospheric variables, usually from remote sensing platforms in orbit around the planet, with a numerical model simulation of the entire atmospheric circulation and surface, using a statistical-dynamical algorithm known as an “assimilation”. The result represents an estimate of the evolving state of the entire global weather and climate that makes optimal use of both direct observations and physical knowledge of the physics and chemistry of the atmosphere and surface (as contained in the design of the numerical model), taking into account statistical uncertainties in both measurements and model simulations. This approach thereby takes account of measurement uncertainty, the incomplete coverage of observations in both space and time and enables the estimation of variables that cannot be measured directly through the internal dynamical consistency of the numerical model. At least four such datasets have been produced during the past decade or so [1-6], based on recent spacecraft observations from the Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) on NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor (MGS), the Mars Climate Sounder (MCS) instrument on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite thermal infrared channel (ACS-TIRVIM) on ESA's Trace Gas Orbiter and the Emirates Mars InfraRed Spectrometer (EMIRS) on the Emirates Mars Mission (EMM), using different assimilation algorithms. In most cases so far, the data assimilated has been limited to retrieved surface temperature and atmospheric temperature profiles, together with column integrated dust opacities (CIDO) and certain other trace gases. Although this leads to reasonable agreement between different assimilations and with independent, out of sample measurements, the neglect of measurements of the vertical structure of atmospheric dust loading leads to significant errors in modelled radiative heating and cooling rates that temperature assimilation is then required to correct. Such a correction is highly undesirable, quite apart from misrepresenting the structure and transport of dust aerosol by the circulation, and increases the likelihood of systematic errors in the reconstructed circulation. In recent work [4], the Analysis Correction system used for the Mars Analysis Correction Assimilation (MACDA) reanalysis [1] has been extended to enable the assimilation of both CIDO and profiles of dust opacity obtained from limb-sounding instruments such as MCS. The results have enabled phenomena such as the climatological elevated dust layers during northern hemisphere summer to be captured in a reanalysis (see Fig. 1), which has been elusive in previous work. In new work presented here, this approach has now been applied to more than 12 Mars years of observations, from early MY24 to the beginning of MY36 (to date), based mainly on retrievals of temperature and dust opacity from the MGS/TES and MRO/MCS instruments that have been assimilated into the UK version of the LMD Mars Planetary Climate Model. This dataset will shortly be available publicly via the UK Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (https://www.ceda.ac.uk/). Here we present an overview of the new reanalysis and illustrate some of its results with the aim of alerting researchers to this new resource for future studies. PLR and AV acknowledge support from the UK Space Agency. The authors are grateful to Armin Kleinböhl and the MCS science team for advice and early access to retrieved data.Figure 1: Snapshots of the zonally averaged structure of the Martian atmosphere during northern late summer in Mars Year 28, showing the zonal and vertical wind, temperature and dust distribution, showing the presence of a persistent elevated dust layer from the MACDA2 reanalysis.[1] Montabone, L., Marsh, K., Lewis, S. R., Read, P. L., Smith, M. D., Holmes, J., et al. (2014). The Mars Analysis Correction Data Assimilation (MACDA) dataset V1.0. Geoscience Data Journal, 1(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.13[2] Greybush, S. J., Kalnay, E., Wilson, R. J., Hoffman, R. N., Nehrkorn, T., Leidner, M., et al. (2019). The Ensemble Mars Atmosphere Reanalysis System (EMARS) version 1.0. Geoscience Data Journal, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.77[3] Holmes, J. A., Lewis, S. R., & Patel, M. R. (2020). OpenMARS: A global record of Martian weather from 1999 to 2015. Planetary and Space Science, 188, 104962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2020.104962[4] Ruan, T., Young, R. M. B., Lewis, S. R., Montabone, L., Valeanu, A., & Read, P. L. (2021). Assimilation of both column- and layer-integrated dust opacity observations in the Martian atmosphere. Earth and Space Science, 8(12), e2021EA001869. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001869[5] Young, R. M. B., Millour, E., Guerlet, S., Forget, F., Ignatiev, N., Grigoriev, A. V., et al. (2022). Assimilation of temperatures and column dust opacities measured by ExoMars TGO-ACS-TIRVIM during the MY34 Global Dust Storm. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127, e2022JE007312. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007312[6] Young, R. M. B., Millour, E., Forget, F., Smith, M. D., Aljaberi, M., Edwards, C. S., et al. (2022). First assimilation of atmospheric temperatures from the Emirates Mars InfraRed Spectrometer. Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2022GL099656.Photochemistry versus Escape in the Trappist-1 planets.
(2025)
Abstract:
Photochemistry versus Escape in the Trappist-1 planets.
Copernicus Publications (2025)
Abstract:
Survive or not survive, that is the question of the 500-hour JWST Rocky Worlds DDT Program. Whether a terrestrial planets’ atmosphere can suffer under the intense XUV of its host, or if it completely escapes, these are the questions we explore. Zahnle & Catling (2017) defined the Cosmic Shoreline, but recent observations from JWST reveal airless worlds around M-stars, calling for a refinement of this “receding” shoreline (Pass et al. 2025). M-stars spend a longer time in pre-main sequence, subjecting their orbiting worlds to some higher intensity XUV activity. This complicates our present understanding of this shoreline. Investigating chemical effects of planet-star interactions could be the key to a more complete picture of this shoreline. We investigate the interplay between photochemistry, mixing, and escape of carbon dioxide atmospheres under intense and mild XUV fluxes as follow on work to both Johnstone et al. (2018) and Nakayama et al. (2022). We expand on this work by adopting thermal structure models from Nakayama et al. (2022) and apply them to identify key chemical pathways for escape. We create a reduced C-O chemical network including neutral and ionic species to identify these pathways. As photochemistry simulations take into account many reactions, these 1D calculations are too computationally expensive to be done in 3D. Although rudimentary at best, the mixing parameter– eddy diffusion term, K_zz, comprises the dynamical element of 1D photochemical simulations. Here, we consider the mixing of photochemical products in competition with escape to explore the chemical pathways of retention and loss. We compare the photochemical model results for active and inactive cases for the Trappist-1 system planets. Then, using the resulting composition-dependent heating and cooling rates for Trappist-1 planets, we assess their propensity for efficient atomic line cooling versus escape. We follow the work of Chatterjee & Pierrehumbert (2024) in this assessment. Finally, using our pathway analysis, we find an analytical formula for calculating an energy-limited escape boundary for these planets based on composition. It is important here to note the limitations of 1D work. First, there exists an exchange of rigor between modelling chemistry and dynamics. Insights from this work are ripe for implementation into 3D GCMs, especially in response to incorporating UV-driven processes for thermospheric modelling mentioned in Ding and Wordsworth (2019). Second, interaction with the interior is important in the early phase of planetary formation, i.e., the magma ocean phase. Due to exchange between atmosphere and magma early in the planet’s formation, incorporation with an interior-atmosphere model would better constrain higher pressure chemical abundances. Although this work focuses on the upper atmosphere, extrapolation to the surface environment is a key goal for understanding a planet. Considering planet-star interaction is imperative for the selection of targets for observation. However, it is also important when considering anomalous detections of atmospheres around planets predicted to not have an atmosphere. This could be a first step in determining an atmosphere as non-primary and/or distinguishing between an airless planet and one with high altitude haze.Refining Exoplanet Escape Predictions with Molecular-Kinetic Simulations
Copernicus Publications (2025)