Planetary Climate Dynamics

Abstract:

Abstract:

Rocky exoplanets accessible to characterization often lie on close-in orbits where tidal heating within their interiors is significant, with the L 98-59 planetary system being a prime example. As a long-term energy source for ongoing mantle melting and outgassing, tidal heating has been considered as a way to replenish lost atmospheres on rocky planets around active M-dwarfs. We simulate the early evolution of L 98-59 b, c, and d using a time-evolved interior-atmosphere modelling framework, with a self-consistent implementation of tidal heating and redox-controlled outgassing. Emerging from our calculations is a novel self-limiting mechanism between radiative cooling, tidal heating, and mantle rheology, which we term the ‘radiation-tide-rheology feedback’. Our coupled modelling yields self-limiting tidal heating estimates that are up to two orders of magnitude lower than previous calculations, and yet are still large enough to enable the extension of primordial magma oceans to Gyr time-scales. Comparisons with a semi-analytic model demonstrate that this negative feedback is a robust mechanism which can probe a given planet’s initial conditions, atmospheric composition, and interior structure. The orbit and instellation of the sub-Venus L 98-59 b likely place it in a regime where tidal heating has kept the planet molten up to the present day, even if it were to have lost its atmosphere. For c and d, a long-lived magma ocean can be induced by tides only with additional atmospheric regulation of energy transport.

Abstract:

To aid the search for atmospheres on rocky exoplanets, we should know what to look for. An unofficial paradigm is to anticipate CO2 present in these atmospheres, through analogy to the solar system and through theoretical modelling. This CO2 would be outgassed from molten silicate rock produced in the planet’s mostly-solid interior—an ongoing self-cooling mechanism that should proceed, in general, so long as the planet has sufficient internal heat to lose.Outgassing of CO2 requires relatively oxidising conditions. Previous work has noted the importance of how oxidising the planet interior is (the oxygen fugacity), which depends strongly on its rock composition. Current models presume that redox reactions between iron species control oxygen fugacity. However, iron alone need not be the sole dictator of how oxidising a planet is. Indeed, carbon itself is a powerful redox element, with great potential to feed back upon the mantle redox state as it melts. Whilst Earth is carbon-poor, even a slightly-higher volatile endowment could trigger carbon-powered geochemistry.We offer a new framework for how carbon is transported from solid planetary interior to atmosphere. The model incorporates realistic carbon geochemistry constrained by recent experiments on CO2 solubility in molten silicate, as well as redox couplings between carbon and iron that have never before been applied to exoplanets. We also incorporate a coupled 1D energy- and mass-balance model to provide first-order predictions of the rate of volcanism.We show that carbon-iron redox coupling maintains interior oxygen fugacity in a narrow range: more reducing than Earth magma, but not reducing enough to destabilise CO2 gas. We predict that most secondary atmospheres, if present, should contain CO2, although the total pressure could be low. An atmospheric non-detection may indicate a planet either born astonishingly dry, or having shut off its internal heat engine.

Abstract:

Recent analyses of wind measurements obtained from tracking cloud motions in spacecraft images of Jupiter and Saturn[1,2] indicate that nonlinear scale-to-scale transfers of kinetic energy act from small to large scales over a wide range of length scales, much as anticipated for 2D or geostrophic turbulence paradigms. At the smallest resolvable scales, however, there is evidence in observations of a forward (downscale) transfer, at least at low and middle latitudes on Jupiter, much like in the Earth’s atmosphere. Moreover, the upscale transfers at the largest spatial scales are evidently dominated by spectrally non-local, highly anisotropic eddy-zonal interactions associated with the generation of intense zonal jets and equatorial super-rotation by direct eddy-zonal flow exchanges. Most analyses to date have emphasised the global mean interactions for both planets, thereby focusing on the spatially homogeneous and isotropic components of the turbulence. Here we present some new analyses of spectral energy transfers on both Jupiter and Saturn that resolve variations in latitude[cf 3], thereby shedding new light on non-homogeneous aspects of jovian turbulent interactions. The results indicate significant variability and inhomogeneity between different locations, with a clear distinction between the tropics, the extratropical middle latitudes and the polar regions. We discuss these in light of other observations and models of gas giant circulation and related laboratory experimental analogues.[1] Antu˜nano, A., del Río-Gaztelurrutia, T., Sánchez-Lavega, A., & Hueso, R. (2015) Dynamics of Saturn’s polar regions. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 120 , 155–176. doi:10.1002/2014JE004709[2] Read, P. L., Antu˜nano, A., Cabanes, S., Colyer, G., del Río-Gaztelurrutia, T., Sánchez-Lavega, A. (2022). Energy exchanges in Saturn’s polar regions fromCassini observations: Eddy-zonal flow interactions. J. Geophys. Res., 127 , e2021JE006973. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JE006973[3] Chemke, R., & Kaspi, Y. (2015). The latitudinal dependence of atmospheric jet scales and macroturbulent energy cascades. J. Atmos. Sci., 72 , 3891–3907. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0007.

Abstract:

The upcoming generation of extremely large ground-based telescopes and space observatories promises to transform our understanding of rocky exoplanets within the habitable zones of their stars. Observations from the James Webb Space Telescope are already challenging current models of exoplanetary atmospheres and interiors (e.g., Foley 2024). Conventionally, a habitable zone exoplanet orbits within a circumstellar region where liquid water could potentially exist on its surface (e.g., Hart 1979; Kasting et al. 1993). It is generally assumed that silicate weathering regulates atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to levels supporting liquid water, providing a stabilizing feedback on climate (Walker et al. 1981); otherwise, planetary habitability would be a matter of luck. This negative feedback underpins the concept of the circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ) and may play a critical role in climate regulation on water-bearing, tectonically active rocky exoplanets. Identifying evidence for a carbon cycle on exoplanets and verifying the validity of the habitable zone concept are key objectives for future research (e.g., Bean et al. 2017)—efforts that would benefit from a deeper understanding of the carbonate–silicate cycle. In particular, the interplay between global climate, atmospheric CO2, and silicate weathering rates is not fully understood. While the role of continental weathering in this negative feedback has been extensively studied, seafloor weathering has received comparatively less attention despite its potential to be equally significant. For instance, during the Late Mesozoic—known for its hothouse climate state—seafloor weathering fluxes were comparable in magnitude to those of continental weathering (e.g., Coogan & Gillis 2013). Here, I explore the factors controlling basalt dissolution by applying the more mechanistic weathering model of Maher and Chamberlain (2014) to both the modern and Late Mesozoic upper oceanic crust.The oceanic crust, through its formation, alteration, and subduction, is a key component of this geochemical cycle. Carbon is transferred from Earth’s mantle to surface reservoirs (e.g., the atmosphere and oceans) via volcanic outgassing. Concurrently, basalt dissolution and carbonate precipitation recapture dissolved carbon from seawater, storing it within the oceanic crust. Over geological timescales, subducted tectonic plates carry these carbonates back into the mantle reservoir, ultimately supplying carbon to volcanoes. Nonetheless, the primary controls on seafloor weathering rates remain debated. Most models have historically focused on the dependence of mineral dissolution kinetics on temperature and CO2 concentrations, yet observational data suggest that both kinetic and thermodynamic factors govern global weathering fluxes, underscoring the need for models that can incorporate this dual control. Kinetic weathering models (e.g., Walker et al. 1981) fail to account for the changes in Earth’s weatherability through time (e.g., West et al. 2005). To address this, Maher & Chamberlain (2014) developed a solute transport model that integrates hydrological and tectonic influences and imposes a thermodynamic limit on weathering rates. However, this model has only occasionally been applied to continental weathering in exoplanet climate studies (e.g., Graham & Pierrehumbert 2020, 2024), and its relevance to seafloor weathering remains largely unexplored (Hakim et al. 2021).In this work, I assessed the model’s sensitivity to key parameters by comparing its predictions with observed age-dependent carbon content in the upper oceanic crust (Gillis & Coogan 2011). I then extended the model into two dimensions to represent the evolving age distribution of Earth’s seafloor and examine its impact on global weathering fluxes. Simulations using this supply-limited seafloor weathering model successfully reproduce observed age-related trends in carbon content within Earth’s upper oceanic crust and provide further evidence that over 80% of carbonate formed within 20 Myr of crust formation (Gillis & Coogan, 2011; Albers et al. 2023). This model can also capture the higher CO2 concentrations in Late Mesozoic crust compared to Cenozoic crust. Our results indicate that crustal age, permeability, porosity and fluid flow strongly influence weathering rates. These findings challenge the prevailing view that elevated temperatures primarily drove enhanced carbon uptake during the Late Mesozoic, emphasizing further the importance of incorporating geologic and hydrologic processes into climate models. Consequently, seafloor weathering emerges as a necessary process not only for understanding Earth’s past climate but also for interpreting future observations of potentially habitable rocky exoplanets.