Toward Consistent Observational Constraints in Climate Predictions and Projections

Frontiers in Climate Frontiers 3 (2021) 678109

Authors:

Gabriele C Hegerl, Andrew P Ballinger, Ben BB Booth, Leonard F Borchert, Lukas Brunner, Markus G Donat, Francisco J Doblas-Reyes, Glen R Harris, Jason Lowe, Rashed Mahmood, Juliette Mignot, James M Murphy, Didier Swingedouw, Antje Weisheimer

Assessment of CMIP6 Performance and Projected Temperature and Precipitation Changes Over South America

Earth Systems and Environment Springer Nature 5:2 (2021) 155-183

Authors:

Mansour Almazroui, Moetasim Ashfaq, M Nazrul Islam, Irfan Ur Rashid, Shahzad Kamil, Muhammad Adnan Abid, Enda O’Brien, Muhammad Ismail, Michelle Simões Reboita, Anna A Sörensson, Paola A Arias, Lincoln Muniz Alves, Michael K Tippett, Sajjad Saeed, Rein Haarsma, Francisco J Doblas-Reyes, Fahad Saeed, Fred Kucharski, Imran Nadeem, Yamina Silva-Vidal, Juan A Rivera, Muhammad Azhar Ehsan, Daniel Martínez-Castro, Ángel G Muñoz, Md Arfan Ali, Erika Coppola, Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla

Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections

Earth's Future American Geophysical Union (AGU) 9:6 (2021) e2020ef001900

Authors:

Z Nicholls, M Meinshausen, J Lewis, M Rojas Corradi, K Dorheim, T Gasser, R Gieseke, AP Hope, NJ Leach, LA McBride, Y Quilcaille, J Rogelj, RJ Salawitch, BH Samset, M Sandstad, A Shiklomanov, RB Skeie, CJ Smith, SJ Smith, X Su, J Tsutsui, B Vega‐Westhoff, DL Woodard

FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration

Geoscientific Model Development Copernicus GmbH 14:5 (2021) 3007-3036

Authors:

Nicholas J Leach, Stuart Jenkins, Zebedee Nicholls, Christopher J Smith, John Lynch, Michelle Cain, Tristram Walsh, Bill Wu, Junichi Tsutsui, Myles R Allen

Abstract:

Here we present an update to the FaIR model for use in probabilistic future climate and scenario exploration, integrated assessment, policy analysis, and education. In this update we have focussed on identifying a minimum level of structural complexity in the model. The result is a set of six equations, five of which correspond to the standard impulse response model used for greenhouse gas (GHG) metric calculations in the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report, plus one additional physically motivated equation to represent state-dependent feedbacks on the response timescales of each greenhouse gas cycle. This additional equation is necessary to reproduce non-linearities in the carbon cycle apparent in both Earth system models and observations. These six equations are transparent and sufficiently simple that the model is able to be ported into standard tabular data analysis packages, such as Excel, increasing the potential user base considerably. However, we demonstrate that the equations are flexible enough to be tuned to emulate the behaviour of several key processes within more complex models from CMIP6. The model is exceptionally quick to run, making it ideal for integrating large probabilistic ensembles. We apply a constraint based on the current estimates of the global warming trend to a million-member ensemble, using the constrained ensemble to make scenario-dependent projections and infer ranges for properties of the climate system. Through these analyses, we reaffirm that simple climate models (unlike more complex models) are not themselves intrinsically biased “hot” or “cold”: it is the choice of parameters and how those are selected that determines the model response, something that appears to have been misunderstood in the past. This updated FaIR model is able to reproduce the global climate system response to GHG and aerosol emissions with sufficient accuracy to be useful in a wide range of applications and therefore could be used as a lowest-common-denominator model to provide consistency in different contexts. The fact that FaIR can be written down in just six equations greatly aids transparency in such contexts.

Your minds on free will

Physics World IOP Publishing 34:2 (2021) 21i-21i

Authors:

Alan M Calverd, Sabine Hossenfelder, Tim Palmer, John Allison