Predictability of weather and climate

Abstract:

Given their increasing relevance for society, I suggest that the climate science community itself does not treat the development of error-free ab initio models of the climate system with sufficient urgency. With increasing levels of difficulty, I discuss a number of proposals for speeding up such development. Firstly, I believe that climate science should make better use of the pool of post-PhD talent in mathematics and physics, for developing next-generation climate models. Secondly, I believe there is more scope for the development of modelling systems which link weather and climate prediction more seamlessly. Finally, here in Europe, I call for a new European Programme on Extreme Computing and Climate to advance our ability to simulate climate extremes, and understand the drivers of such extremes. A key goal for such a programme is the development of a 1km global climate system model to run on the first exascale supercomputers in the early 2020s.

Abstract:

A new approach for improving the accuracy of data assimilation, by trading numerical precision for ensemble size, is introduced. Data assimilation is inherently uncertain due to the use of noisy observations and imperfect models. Thus, the larger rounding errors incurred from reducing precision may be within the tolerance of the system. Lower precision arithmetic is cheaper, and so by reducing precision in ensemble data assimilation, computational resources can be redistributed towards, for example, a larger ensemble size. Because larger ensembles provide a better estimate of the underlying distribution and are less reliant on covariance inflation and localization, lowering precision could actually permit an improvement in the accuracy of weather forecasts. Here, this idea is tested on an ensemble data assimilation system comprising the Lorenz ’96 toy atmospheric model and the ensemble square root filter. The system is run at double, single and half precision (the latter using an emulation tool), and the performance of each precision is measured through mean error statistics and rank histograms. The sensitivity of these results to the observation error and the length of the observation window are addressed. Then, by reinvesting the saved computational resources from reducing precision into the ensemble size, assimilation error can be reduced for (hypothetically) no extra cost. This results in increased forecasting skill, with respect to double precision assimilation.

Abstract:

Increasing the resolution of numerical models has played a large part in improving the accuracy of weather and climate forecasts in recent years. Until now, this has required the use of ever more powerful computers, the energy costs of which are becoming increasingly problematic. It has therefore been proposed that forecasters switch to using more efficient ‘reduced precision’ hardware capable of sacrificing unnecessary numerical precision to save costs. Here, an extended form of the Lorenz ‘96 idealized model atmosphere is used to test whether more accurate forecasts could be produced by lowering numerical precision more at smaller spatial scales in order to increase the model resolution. Both a scale-dependent mixture of single- and half-precision – where numbers are represented with fewer bits of information on smaller spatial scales – and ‘stochastic processors’ – where random ‘bit-flips’ are allowed for small-scale variables – are emulated on conventional hardware. It is found that high-resolution parametrized models with scale-selective reduced precision yield better short-term and climatological forecasts than lower resolution parametrized models with conventional precision for a relatively small increase in computational cost. This suggests that a similar approach in real-world models could lead to more accurate and efficient weather and climate forecasts.