Posits as an alternative to floats for weather and climate models
CoNGA'19 Proceedings of the Conference for Next Generation Arithmetic 2019 Association for Computing Machinery (2019)
Abstract:
Posit numbers, a recently proposed alternative to floating-point numbers, claim to have smaller arithmetic rounding errors in many applications. By studying weather and climate models of low and medium complexity (the Lorenz system and a shallow water model) we present benefits of posits compared to floats at 16 bit. As a standardised posit processor does not exist yet, we emulate posit arithmetic on a conventional CPU. Using a shallow water model, forecasts based on 16-bit posits with 1 or 2 exponent bits are clearly more accurate than half precision floats. We therefore propose 16 bit with 2 exponent bits as a standard posit format, as its wide dynamic range of 32 orders of magnitude provides a great potential for many weather and climate models. Although the focus is on geophysical fluid simulations, the results are also meaningful and promising for reduced precision posit arithmetic in the wider field of computational fluid dynamics.The perfect storm: human influence on the loss potential of Eunice-like cyclones
Environmental Research Letters IOP Publishing (2026)
Abstract:
Combining Observations, Forecasts and Projections into Seamless Climate Information: Recent Advances and Insights in User Applications
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (2026)
Abstract:
Increase in European summer heatwaves driven by greenhouse gases and amplified by aerosol emission reductions
Environmental Research Letters IOP Publishing 21:11 (2026) 114008
Abstract:
More frequent heatwaves in Europe are posing considerable risks to human health, infrastructure, and ecosystems. However, the contributions of external forcing factors such as well-mixed greenhouse gases (GHGs) and aerosols remain to be better quantified. Here, using model outputs from the Large Ensemble Single Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (LESFMIP), a recent atmospheric reanalysis and a machine learning method—self-organising maps (SOMs), we attribute European heatwave trends during 1940–2020 to various external forcings. The Europe-averaged heatwave trend during 1940–2020 (0.87 days per decade) is well captured by the multi-model mean (MMM) response with GHGs dominating the trend. The positive heatwave trend in GHGs and ozone is offset by the effects of aerosols during 1940–1979, leading to weak negative heatwave trends. In contrast, the increase in GHGs has driven about half (53 ± 17%; MMM and model-spread) of the strong heatwave trends in 1980–2020 (2.5 days per decade), amplified by the reduction in aerosols (23 ± 15%). This highlights the increasing risk of more frequent heatwaves in Europe if GHG emissions continue to rise without significant mitigation measures. Analysis of atmospheric circulation by SOMs reveals that four major atmospheric circulation patterns, dominated by a blocking high anomaly, are linked to the most spatially-intense European summer heatwaves. A relatively large increase in the occurrence of blocking-like atmospheric circulation has likely exacerbated heatwave trends in Southern and Eastern Europe in 1980–2020. However, this atmospheric circulation trend is much weaker in the model response, and also seems to be outside the internal variability in most of the models. This may partly explain the underestimated heatwave trends in Southern and Eastern Europe. Constraining and further understanding of the thermodynamic and dynamic response in the LESFMIP models is important for attributing and predicting the multi-annual and decadal variability of climate and weather extremes.Towards disentangling human-induced drivers of precipitation trends from naturally occurring ones.
Nature (2026)