Evidence for the chaotic origin of Northern Annular Mode variability

Geophysical Research Letters 38:15 (2011)

Authors:

SM Osprey, MHP Ambaum

Abstract:

Exponential spectra are found to characterize variability of the Northern Annular Mode (NAM) for periods less than 36 days. This corresponds to the observed rounding of the autocorrelation function at lags of a few days. The characteristic persistence timescales during winter and summer is found to be ∼5 days for these high frequencies. Beyond periods of 36 days the characteristic decorrelation timescale is ∼20 days during winter and ∼6 days in summer. We conclude that the NAM cannot be described by autoregressive models for high frequencies; the spectra are more consistent with low-order chaos. We also propose that the NAM exhibits regime behaviour, however the nature of this has yet to be identified. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.

High frequency variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation

Ocean Science Copernicus Publications 7:4 (2011) 471-486

Authors:

B Balan Sarojini, JM Gregory, R Tailleux, GR Bigg, AT Blaker, DR Cameron, NR Edwards, AP Megann, LC Shaffrey, B Sinha

Climate Sensitivity via a Nonparametric Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences American Meteorological Society 68:5 (2011) 937-953

Authors:

Fenwick C Cooper, Peter H Haynes

Stratosphere-resolving Models in CMIP5

Clivar Exchanges International CLIVAR Project Office 16 (2011) 2

Authors:

E Manzini, SC Hardiman, SM Osprey, AA Scaife

Accuracy of climate change predictions using high resolution simulations as surrogates of truth

Geophysical Research Letters 38:5 (2011)

Authors:

M Matsueda, TN Palmer

Abstract:

How accurate are predictions of climate change from a model which is biased against contemporary observations? If a model bias can be thought of as a state-independent linear offset, then the signal of climate change derived from a biased climate model should not be affected substantially by that model's bias. By contrast, if the processes which cause model bias are highly nonlinear, we could expect the accuracy of the climate change signal to degrade with increasing bias. Since we do not yet know the late 21st Century climate change signal, we cannot say at this stage which of these two paradigms describes best the role of model bias in studies of climate change. We therefore study this question using time-slice projections from a global climate model run at two resolutions - a resolution typical of contemporary climate models and a resolution typical of contemporary numerical weather prediction - and treat the high-resolution model as a surrogate of truth, for both 20th and 21st Century climate. We find that magnitude of the regionally varying model bias is a partial predictor of the accuracy of the regional climate change signal for both wind and precipitation. This relationship is particularly apparent for the 850 mb wind climate change signal. Our analysis lends some support to efforts to weight multi-model ensembles of climate change according to 20th Century bias, though note that the optimal weighting appears to be a nonlinear function of bias. Copyright © 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.