Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 118:10 (2013) 3956-3971

Authors:

JA Anstey, P Davini, LJ Gray, TJ Woollings, N Butchart, C Cagnazzo, B Christiansen, SC Hardiman, SM Osprey, S Yang

Abstract:

Blocking of the tropospheric jet stream during Northern Hemisphere winter (December-January-February) is examined in a multi-model ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (GCMs) obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The CMIP5 models exhibit large biases in blocking frequency and related biases in tropospheric jet latitude, similar to earlier generations of GCMs. Underestimated blocking at high latitudes, especially over Europe, is common. In general, model biases decrease as model resolution increases. Increased blocking frequency at high latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific basins, as well as more realistic variability of Atlantic jet latitude, are associated with increased vertical resolution in the mid-troposphere to lowermost stratosphere. Finer horizontal resolution is associated with higher blocking frequency at all latitudes in the Atlantic basin but appears to have no systematic impact on blocking near Greenland or in the Pacific basin. Results from the CMIP5 analysis are corroborated by additional controlled experiments using selected GCMs. Key PointsCMIP5 models have large blocking biases and associated jet biasesIncreased spatial resolution is associated with reduced blocking and jet biasesVertical and horizontal resolution give blocking changes in different regions ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Stochastic Parameterisations and Model Uncertainty in the Lorenz '96 system

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences Royal Society 371 (2013) 20110479

Authors:

HM Arnold, IM Moroz, TN Palmer

Climate extremes and the role of dynamics.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:14 (2013) 5281-5282

Effect of mid‐latitude blocking anticyclones on the weather of the Arabian Peninsula

International Journal of Climatology Wiley 33:3 (2013) 585-598

Authors:

H Athar, Mansour Almazroui, M Nazrul Islam, M Adnan Abid, M Azhar Ehsan

Predicting multiyear North Atlantic Ocean variability

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118:3 (2013) 1087-1098

Authors:

W Hazeleger, B Wouters, GJ Van Oldenborgh, S Corti, T Palmer, D Smith, N Dunstone, J Kröger, H Pohlmann, JS Von Storch

Abstract:

We assess the skill of retrospective multiyear forecasts of North Atlantic ocean characteristics obtained with ocean-atmosphere-sea ice models that are initialized with estimates from the observed ocean state. We show that these multimodel forecasts can skilfully predict surface and subsurface ocean variability with lead times of 2 to 9 years. We focus on assessment of forecasts of major well-observed oceanic phenomena that are thought to be related to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). Variability in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre, in particular that associated with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, is skilfully predicted 2-9 years ahead. The fresh water content and heat content in major convection areas such as the Labrador Sea are predictable as well, although individual events are not captured. The skill of these predictions is higher than that of uninitialized coupled model simulations and damped persistence. However, except for heat content in the subpolar gyre, differences between damped persistence and the initialized predictions are not significant. Since atmospheric variability is not predictable on multiyear time scales, initialization of the ocean and oceanic processes likely provide skill. Assessment of relationships of patterns of variability and ocean heat content and fresh water content shows differences among models indicating that model improvement can lead to further improvements of the predictions. The results imply there is scope for skilful predictions of the AMOC. © 2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.