Does 'net zero' mean zero cows?
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Taylor & Francis 80:3 (2024) 153-157
Abstract:
A significant share of anthropogenic global warming comes from livestock production. There is debate about whether there can be any role for livestock in a climatically sustainable future; the debate is particularly heated for cows and sheep, largely due to the methane they burp out. However, short-lived gases like methane affect climate in a fundamentally different way than long-lived gases like carbon dioxide. Consequently, climate stabilization does not require zeroing-out cattle herds. But this doesn't mean we can eat our beef and have it (a tolerable climate) too-livestock still contribute to global warming. Preventing or limiting future growth in livestock-related emissions can represent a sensible part of the portfolio of responses to the climate crisis, particularly when carbon dioxide emissions are not on track to reach net zero sufficiently quickly.A reanalysis of ISO-SWS Jupiter observations: first results
Copernicus Publications (2024)
Constraints on aerosol structure and formation in the atmosphere of the ice giants from microphysics simulations
Copernicus Publications (2024)
Destination: Space! A Virtual Flash Talk Series
Copernicus Publications (2024)
Detection of Cyclopropenylidene on Titan
Copernicus Publications (2024)