Comments on Barker and Astoul (2021)
(2021)
Abstract:
The tidal evolution of interacting binaries when the orbital period is short compared to the primary star's convective time scale is a problem of long-standing. Terquem (2021) has argued that, when this temporal ordering scheme is obeyed, the rate of energy transfer from tides to convection (denoted $D_R$) is given by the product of the averaged Reynolds stress associated with the tidal velocity and the mean shear associated with the convective flow. In a recent response, Barker and Astoul (2021, hereafter BA21) claim to show that $D_R$ (in this form) cannot contribute to tidal dissipation. Their analysis is based on a study of Boussinesq and anelastic models. Here, we demonstrate that BA21 misidentify the correct term responsible for energy transfer between tides and convection. As a consequence, their anelastic calculations do not prove that the $D_R$ formulation is invalidated as an energy-loss coupling between tides and convection. BA21 also carry out a calculation in the Boussinesq approximation. Here, their claim that $D_R$ once again does not contribute is based on boundary conditions that do not apply to any star or planet that radiates energy from its surface, which is a key dissipational process in the problem we consider.Covariant Decomposition of The Non-Linear Galaxy Number Counts and Their Monopole
ArXiv 2106.15139 (2021)
Probing supermassive stars and massive black hole seeds through gravitational wave inspirals
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 505:3 (2021) 3944-3949
Evidence of 100 TeV $\gamma$-ray emission from HESS J1702-420: A new PeVatron candidate
(2021)