Theory Summary: Very High Energy Cosmic Rays
EPJ Web of Conferences 52 (2013) 12001
Observation of the cosmic-ray shadow of the Moon with IceCube
ArXiv 1305.6811 (2013)
Abstract:
We report on the observation of a significant deficit of cosmic rays from the direction of the Moon with the IceCube detector. The study of this "Moon shadow" is used to characterize the angular resolution and absolute pointing capabilities of the detector. The detection is based on data taken in two periods before the completion of the detector: between April 2008 and May 2009, when IceCube operated in a partial configuration with 40 detector strings deployed in the South Pole ice, and between May 2009 and May 2010 when the detector operated with 59 strings. Using two independent analysis methods, the Moon shadow has been observed to high significance (> 6 sigma) in both detector configurations. The observed location of the shadow center is within 0.2 degrees of its expected position when geomagnetic deflection effects are taken into account. This measurement validates the directional reconstruction capabilities of IceCube.Does Dark Energy Really Exist?
Scientific American Springer Nature 22:2s (2013) 58-65
Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations with IceCube
ArXiv 1305.3909 (2013)
Abstract:
We present the first statistically significant detection of neutrino oscillations in the high-energy regime ($>$ 20 GeV) from an analysis of IceCube Neutrino Observatory data collected in 2010-2011. This measurement is made possible by the low energy threshold of the DeepCore detector ($\sim 20$ GeV) and benefits from the use of the IceCube detector as a veto against cosmic ray-induced muon background. The oscillation signal was detected within a low-energy muon neutrino sample (20 -- 100 GeV) extracted from data collected by DeepCore. A high-energy muon neutrino sample (100 GeV -- 10 TeV) was extracted from IceCube data to constrain systematic uncertainties. Disappearance of low-energy upward-going muon neutrinos was observed, and the non-oscillation hypothesis is rejected with more than $5\sigma$ significance. In a two-neutrino flavor formalism, our data are best described by the atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters $\Delta m^2_{23}= (2.3^{+0.6}_{-0.5})\cdot 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$ and $\sin^2(2 \theta_{23})>0.93$, and maximum mixing is favored.The unbearable lightness of being: CDMS versus XENON
ArXiv 1304.6066 (2013)