The impact of a stochastic parameterization scheme on climate sensitivity in EC‐Earth

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres American Geophysical Union 124:23 (2019) 12726-12740

Authors:

Kristian Strommen, PAG Watson, TN Palmer

Abstract:

Stochastic schemes, designed to represent unresolved sub-grid scale variability, are frequently used in short and medium-range weather forecasts, where they are found to improve several aspects of the model. In recent years, the impact of stochastic physics has also been found to be beneficial for the model's long term climate. In this paper, we demonstrate for the first time that the inclusion of a stochastic physics scheme can notably affect a model's projection of global warming, as well as its historical climatological global temperature. Specifically, we find that when including the 'stochastically perturbed parametrisation tendencies' scheme (SPPT) in the fully coupled climate model EC-Earth v3.1, the predicted level of global warming between 1850 and 2100 is reduced by 10% under an RCP8.5 forcing scenario. We link this reduction in climate sensitivity to a change in the cloud feedbacks with SPPT. In particular, the scheme appears to reduce the positive low cloud cover feedback, and increase the negative cloud optical feedback. A key role is played by a robust, rapid increase in cloud liquid water with SPPT, which we speculate is due to the scheme's non-linear interaction with condensation.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence to aid climate change research and preparedness

Environmental Research Letters IOP Publishing 14 (2019) 12

Authors:

C Huntingford, ES Jeffers, Michael Bonsall, H Christensen, T Lees, H Yang

Does ENSO regularity increase in a warming climate?

Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society (2019) JCLI-D-19-0545.1

Authors:

Judith Berner, Hannah M Christensen, Prashant D Sardeshmukh

Abstract:

The impact of a warming climate on El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is investigated in large ensemble simulations of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1). These simulations are forced by historical emissions for the past and the RCP8.5-scenario emissions for future projections. The simulated variance of the Nino-3.4 ENSO index increases from 1.4C2 in 1921-1980 to 1.9C2 in 1981-2040 and 2.2C2 in 2041-2100. The autocorrelation timescale of the index also increases, consistent with a narrowing of its spectral peak in the 3- to 7-yr ENSO band, raising the possibility of greater seasonal to interannual predictability in the future. Low-order linear inverse models (LIMs) fitted separately to the three 60-yr periods capture the CESM1 increase in ENSO variance and regularity. Remarkably, most of the increase can be attributed to the increase in the 23-month damping timescale of a single damped oscillatoryENSO eigenmode of these LIMs by 5 months in 1981-2040 and 6 months in 2041-2100. These apparently robust projected increases may however be compromised by CESM1 biases in ENSO amplitude and damping timescale. A LIM fitted to the 1921-1980 observations has an ENSO eigenmode with a much shorter 8-month damping timescale, similar to that of several other eigenmodes. When the mode’s damping timescale is increased by 5 and 6 months in this observational LIM, a much smaller increase of ENSO variance is obtained than in the CESM1 projections. This may be because ENSO is not as dominated by a single ENSO eigenmode in reality as it is in the CESM1.

Progress towards a probabilistic Earth system model: examining the impact of stochasticity in the atmosphere and land component of EC-Earth v3.2

Geoscientific Model Development European Geosciences Union 12 (2019) 3099-3118

Authors:

Kristian Strommen, Hannah Christensen, D Macleod, S Juricke, TN Palmer

Abstract:

We introduce and study the impact of three stochastic schemes in the EC-Earth climate model: two atmospheric schemes and one stochastic land scheme. These form the basis for a probabilistic Earth system model in atmosphere-only mode. Stochastic parametrization have become standard in several operational weather-forecasting models, in particular due to their beneficial impact on model spread. In recent years, stochastic schemes in the atmospheric component of a model have been shown to improve aspects important for the models long-term climate, such as El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic weather regimes, and the Indian monsoon. Stochasticity in the land component has been shown to improve the variability of soil processes and improve the representation of heatwaves over Europe. However, the raw impact of such schemes on the model mean is less well studied. It is shown that the inclusion of all three schemes notably changes the model mean state. While many of the impacts are beneficial, some are too large in amplitude, leading to significant changes in the model's energy budget and atmospheric circulation. This implies that in order to maintain the benefits of stochastic physics without shifting the mean state too far from observations, a full re-tuning of the model will typically be required.

The Sensitivity of Euro-Atlantic Regimes to Model Horizontal Resolution

Geophysical Research Letters American Geophysical Union (2019)

Authors:

K Strommen, I Mavilia, S Corti, M Matsueda, P Davini, J von Hardenberg, P-L Vidale, R Mizuta

Abstract:

There is growing evidence that the atmospheric dynamics of the Euro-Atlantic sector during winter is driven in part by the presence of quasi-persistent regimes. However, general circulation models typically struggle to simulate these, with e.g. an overly weakly persistent blocking regime. Previous studies have showed that increased horizontal resolution can improve the regime structure of a model, but have so far only considered a single model with only one ensemble member at each resolution, leaving open the possibility that this may be either coincidental or model-dependent. We show that the improvement in regime structure due to increased resolution is robust across multiple models with multiple ensemble members. However, while the high resolution models have notably more tightly clustered data, other aspects of the regimes may not necessarily improve, and are also subject to a large amount of sampling variability that typically requires at least three ensemble members to surmount.